Diritto Romano e mestiere del giurista. Esperienze, confronti, prospettive
Associazione Italiana di Diritto RomanoConvegno: in presenzaLuogo: Aula 431, Università degli Studi di Milano — Via Festa del Perdono 3, Milano4–5 giugno 2026Contatti: Segreteria organizzativa (aidrmilano2026@unimi.it)
Per il programma completo del convegno (PDF): UniMil
Programma:
Giovedì 4 giugno 2026
Ore 14.30Saluti istituzionaliStefano Simonetta — ProrettoreGiuseppe Ondei — Presidente Corte d’Appello di MilanoAngela Santangelo — Direttore Dipartimento di diritto privato e storia del dirittoCarla Masi Doria — Presidente AIDR
Prima sessione. Il diritto come scienza per l’uomo. Omne ius hominum causa constitutumPresiede Chiara Tenella SillaniFrancesco Fasolino — Ordinario di Diritto romano, Università degli Studi di SalernoAlberto Venturelli — Ordinario di Diritto civile, Università degli Studi di Brescia
Discussione
Ore 17.00Seconda sessione. Diritto romano e teoria generale del dirittoPresiede Claudio LuzzatiLuigi Garofalo — Ordinario di Diritto romano, Università degli Studi di PadovaCarlo Nitsch — Ordinario di Filosofia del diritto, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Discussione
Cena sociale
Venerdì 5 giugno 2026
Ore 9.30Terza sessione. Il metodo esegetico al vaglio della contemporaneitàPresiede Sandro SchipaniPietro Sirena — Ordinario di Diritto civile, Università Commerciale “Luigi Bocconi”
Discussione
Ore 11.00Tavola rotondaPresiede Patrizia GiuntiGiovanni Canzio — Già primo Presidente di CassazioneFrancesco Della Rocca — Notaio, Consigliere e Coordinatore delle Commissioni scientifiche del CNNAntonio Genovese — Già Presidente di Sezione di CassazioneC. Orisel Hernández Aguilar — “Titular” di Diritto romano, Università di Pinar del Río (Cuba)Thomas Rüfner — Ordinario di Diritto romano e Diritto civile, Università di Treviri (Germania); Giudice presso la Corte d’Appello di CoblenzaAldo Schiavone — Emerito di Diritto romano, Scuola Normale Superiore
Discussione
Ore 14.30
Assemblea dei soci
Elezione dei rappresentanti nel Direttivo
Search
26 May 2026
SEMINAR: Diritto Romano e mestiere del giurista. Esperienze, confronti, prospettive [Associazione Italiana di Diritto Romano] (Università degli Studi di Milano, 4–5 JUN 2026)
BOOK: Dominika UCKIEWICZ, Accountability for War Crimes in the Policy of the Polish Government-in-Exile. A Legal and Historical Analysis (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff/Brill, 2026), ISBN 9789004759015, OPEN ACCESS
Abstract:
This book excavates the often neglected role of the Polish government-in-exile within the Allied war crimes trial programme and post-1945 international law. Drawing on newly examined archival sources and biographies of key émigré lawyers, it reveals how Polish and other Eastern European jurists helped define the concept of accountability for wartime atrocities long before the Allies convened at Nuremberg. Combining legal and historical approaches, this book traces the Central and Eastern European influence on the UN War Crimes Commission and Allied policy, showing how their ideas about justice, responsibility, victim’s perspective, and law continue to resonate in modern interpretations of the legacy of Nuremberg.
Read more here: DOI 10.1163/9789004759015.
25 May 2026
FORMATION DOCTORALE : Ma thèse à l’ère de l’intelligence artificielle générative: enjeux, outils et pratiques situées [2e journée de formation commune de l’ED4 HiSTAR] (Louvain-la-Neuve, 5 JUN 2026)
ED4 HiSTARJournée de formation doctorale : en présentielLieu : Louvain-la-NeuveDate : vendredi 5 juin 2026Inscription obligatoire avant le 22 mai 2026 à midi via le formulaire disponible sur le site HiSTAR:Programme complet (PDF) :Programme:
1e partie. Introduction théorique à l’IA, aperçu exploratoire de la diversité des applications possibles
9h45 – 12h15
Collège Erasme, salle polyvalentePascal Vangrunderbeeck — Conseiller pédagogique numérique et IA au Louvain Learning Lab
Comprendre l’effet Woaw des interfaces d’IAg et perspectives pour développer l’esprit critiqueNicolás Marín Bayona — UCLouvain
Voir sans regarder : analyse critique des dispositifs computationnels d’analyse d’image en Digital Art HistoryCamille Berny — UCLouvain
Analyser le risque ferroviaire dans les annales parlementaires avec l’IA : contraintes matérielles, protocoles de dépouillement et enjeux épistémologiques12h15 – 13h30
Lunch2e partie. Formation pratique
13h30 – 17h
Pool informatique Socrate 31-32Jonathan Dedonder — Logisticien de recherches en sciences humaines, UCLouvain – IACCHOS
De l’outil au corpus : IA générative, art du prompting et posture épistémologiqueCet atelier propose une entrée à la fois pratique et critique dans l’usage de l’IA générative pour le traitement de corpus textuels. Il s’organise en trois temps : réflexion sur les enjeux liés à l’usage de l’IA dans la recherche (protection des données, acceptabilité disciplinaire, traçabilité méthodologique), panorama des outils disponibles et initiation au prompt engineering, suivis d’exercices pratiques et d’un retour réflexif collectif sur les enjeux épistémologiques liés à l’intégration de ces outils dans la recherche scientifique.
BOOK: Clifford ANDO, Mirko CANEVARO & Benjamin STRAUMANN (eds.), The Cambridge History of Rights, vol.I: The Ancient World [The Cambridge History of Rights, eds. Nehal BHUTA, Anthony PAGDEN & Mira L. SIEGELBERG] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026), ISBN 9781108837354, 120 GBP
The ancient world existed before the modern conceptual and linguistic apparatus of rights, and any attempts to understand its place in history must be undertaken with care. This volume covers not only Greco-Roman antiquity, but ranges from the ancient Near East to early Confucian China; Deuteronomic Judaism to Ptolemaic Egypt; and rabbinic Judaism to Sasanian law. It describes ancient normative conceptions of personhood and practices of law in a way that respects their historical and linguistic particularity, appreciating the distinctiveness of the cultures under study whilst clarifying their salience for comparative study. Through thirteen expertly researched essays, volume one of The Cambridge History of Rights is a comprehensive and authoritative reference for the history of rights in the global ancient world and highlights societies that the field has long neglected.
Table of contents:
Introduction Clifford Ando, Mirko Canevaro and Benjamin Straumann
- 1. To claim to protect claims: the generative discourse of Mesopotamian legal rights Seth Richardson
- 2. The individual and the communal: early Confucian resources for human rights May Sim
- 3. human rights in the Hebrew Bible? Sandra Jacobs
- 4. Greek subjective rights? Justice, legal discourse, and legal institutions Mirko Canevaro and Linda Rocchi
- 5. Aristotle on subjective rights Pia Campeggiani
- 6. Do rights exist in Hellenistic philosophy? Jon Miller
- 7. Rights in Ptolemaic Egypt Nadine Grotkamp
- 8. Rights in Roman Republican thought Valentina Arena
- 9. Ius in the subjective sense in classical Roman law Charles Donahue, Jr
- 10. Rights and dignity in late ancient thought Kyle Harper
- 11. Rights in late ancient law? Noel Lenski
- 12. Rabbinic Judaism Alyssa M. Gray
- 13. Sasanian law Maria Macuch.
22 May 2026
BOOK: Ville KARI, The Classical Doctrine of Civil War in International Law [Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, eds. Larissa VAN DEN HERIK, &Jean D'ASPREMONT] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026), ISBN 9781009218665
In the classical law of nations there was a doctrine of civil war. This book sets out to recover the forgotten legal tradition that shaped the modern world from 1575-1975. The result is an autonomous reassessment of four hundred years of the law of insurgencies and revolutions, both in state practice and in legal scholarship. Its journey through centuries of rebellion and the rule of law touches some of the most basic questions of international law across ages. What does it mean to stand among the nations of the world? Who should be welcomed among the subjects of international law, who should not, and who should decide? Its findings not only help make the classical doctrine understandable again, but also offer potential new insights for present-day lawyers about the origins, aspirations and vulnerabilities of the legal tradition with which they work today.
CLH ARTICLE: Mehmed BECIC, The Commercial Law for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1883: A legal transplant debate perspective (Comparative Legal History, XIII (2025), nr. 2 (December), pp. 222-251)
The subject of this article is the Commercial Law for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1883. This law represented a legal transplant of German commercial law. At the time of its adoption in 1883, the Commercial Law did not represent a mirror of society. However, archival sources point to the fact that the government did not actually aim to impose a law that reflected the socio-economic conditions or business and commercial practices in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The imposition of this legal transplant was aimed at unifying commercial law in a unified customs territory. A contextual analysis, based on archival sources, economic policies and economic history, confirmed that the government was interested in imposing precisely this kind of legal solution (legal transplant) to achieve specific legal, social and economic effects and transform the existing socio-legal and economic system of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
21 May 2026
BOOK: Vid ŽEPIĆ, Favor debitoris. Varstvo dolžnika v rimskem pravu (Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta & Litteralis d.o.o., 2026), 496 p., ISBN 978-961-7162-25-7, € 79.90
Monografija obravnava razvoj načela favor debitoris oziroma krepitev varstva dolžnika v poznoantičnem rimskem pravu. Na podlagi analize cesarskih konstitucij od 4. do 6. stoletja prikazuje, kako so družbene, gospodarske in politične spremembe vplivale na zakonodajne ukrepe za zaščito dolžnika kot šibkejše stranke obligacijskega razmerja.
Posebna pozornost je namenjena razlagi pogodb, omejevanju pogodbene avtonomije, prenehanju obveznosti ter izvršbi in zavarovanju terjatev. Raziskava obenem osvetljuje vpliv gospodarske krize, provincialne pravne prakse, stoiške filozofije in vzhodnorimskih pravnih šol na razvoj poznega rimskega prava ter pokaže, kako so ti procesi vplivali tudi na kasnejši razvoj socialnih korektivov v civilnem pravu.
On the author:
Dr. Vid Žepič je docent na Katedri za pravno zgodovino Pravne fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani.
Table of contents:
Uvod
1.1 Razvojne težnje in dejavniki rimskega obligacijskega prava
1.2 Metodologija
1.3 Stanje raziskav(2) Razvojni dejavniki postklasičnega prava
2.1 Cesarske konstitucije – ius novum
2.2 Razvojni dejavniki(3) Favor debitoris in njegove pojavne oblike
3.1 Favor debitoris – pojmovna analiza
3.2 Razlaga pravnih poslov
3.3 Omejevanje pogodbene avtonomije
3.4 Prenehanje obveznosti
3.5 Zavarovanje in izvršba(4) Sklep
4.1 Favor debitoris v rimskem pravnem izročilu
4.2 Razvojni dejavniki načela favor debitoris
4.3 Pot do materializacije civilnega prava(5) Zusammenfassung
Find more on Pravna fakulteta Univeza v Ljubljani & Knjigarna pravna.
BOOK: Paolo AMOROSA, Ville ERKILLÄ & Karolina STENLUND (eds.), Times of Global Injustice. Temporalities of Power and Community Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries [Routledge Studies in Law, Rights and Justice] (London: Routledge, 2026), 388 p. ISBN 9781032873770, € 190
Time is an essential dimension of our shared understandings of the historical significance or fairness of a particular event or situation. The ways time is constructed, however, are characterised by a plurality of diverse and sometimes inconsistent representations. This book examines the uses of different conceptualizations of time in explaining injustice and justice in society from an interdisciplinary perspective. It is the temporal representations that are the focus of this book here: how and by whom are they constructed, how do they weave together or fray in the process of working through temporary or permanent injustices, and what spaces are made or quashed for different understandings of time? The volume gathers scholars from different backgrounds with expertise from law, history, politics and international relations, philosophy, and sociology to examine the temporality of (in)justice in society. The chapters of the book are integrated around a coherent central theme: the unavoidable intertwining of time and justice. As well as addressing the lived processes of collectively coming to terms with temporal experiences and justice, the book work also discusses the different disciplinary ways of making sense of such processes and the strengths and pitfalls of each approach. The collection will be of interest to researchers and students of legal theory, international relations, global history, memory studies, and political philosophy.
Table of contents:
1.Introduction. Times of Global (In)justice.
Paolo Amorosa, Ville Erkkilä, Karolina StenlundPart I: Offcial Time
2. Why Do People Move? Governing the Time and Space of Climate Migration.
Usha Natarajan3. Yesterday’s tomorrows and today’s: Future-making in Swedish permit-granting procedure
Agnes Hellner4. As If a Foreign Country: Evidence Law and Settler Colonial Sovereignty.
Genevieve Renard Painter5. State redress for involuntary sterilisation in Sweden.
Malin Arvidsson6. Urgency and Exceptional Time: The State of Emergency as an institution of official time.
Tuukka BrunilaPart II: Emancipatory Time
7. How to Overcome an Unjust Past? Conflicts of Historicities in the Contemporary World.
Marek Tamm & Zoltán Boldizsár Simon8. Urgency! At the European Court of Human Rights: Hope, Haste and Climate Justice.
Zoë Jay9. Existential time and climate in/justice at the end of the world.
Andrew R. Hom10.Law, Time, and Tradition.
Sebastián Machado11.Stitching as reparation: expanding narrations of the past and imagining the future.
Helena Alviar García & Laura Betancur RestrepoPart III: Everyday Time
12.Authoritarian Regimes and the ’Everyday Time.’ The trial of Greta Wolff.
Ville Erkkilä13. Times of Hermeneutical Injustice: Memory Struggle in the Public Discussion around the Attack on the Elias Lönnrot Monument.
Ulla Savolainen14. Rehearsing the Future Through Design.
Sara Duell15. The Shape of Time to Come: The History of the Future in Teleological legal reasoning.
Karolina Stenlund16. Conclusions: Just(ice) in Time
Bo Stråth
On the editors:
Paolo Amorosa is University Lecturer of International Law at the Law Faculty, University of Helsinki, Finland. Ville Erkkilä is an Academy Research Fellow at the Centre for European Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland. Karolina Stenlund is a university researcher and team leader at the Research Council of Finland’s Centre of Excellence in Law, Identity, and the European Narratives (EuroStorie), based at the University of Helsinki, Finland.
Read more here.
CALL FOR PROPOSALS: International Conference on Risk and Insurance in History (ICRIH) [HOSTING PROPOSALS FOR 2028–2029]
The Scientific Committee of the International Conference on Risk and Insurance in History (ICRIH) has issued a call for proposals to organize and host the next edition of the conference in the summer of 2028 or, at the latest, 2029.
Since its inaugural meeting in Seville in 2019, followed by conferences in Basel (2022) and Warsaw (2025), the ICRIH has established itself as a major interdisciplinary forum for scholars working on the historical and long-term dimensions of risk and insurance. Previous editions brought together researchers from across the world and covered topics ranging from marine insurance and maritime law, insurance and the Atlantic slave trade, and micro-insurance, to modern financial instruments and alternative risk transfer mechanisms.
The Scientific Committee invites proposals from institutions interested in hosting the next conference. The selected organizing committee will work closely with the Scientific Committee, which will provide support regarding conference structure, call for papers, keynote speakers, paper evaluation, awards, and fundraising. A dedicated conference website is also being developed by the University of Basel.
The ICRIH welcomes interdisciplinary engagement from fields including economic, business, financial, legal, social, and cultural history, as well as economics, sociology, anthropology, management studies, and legal studies. The conference has also traditionally included participation from professionals in the insurance industry alongside established and early-career researchers.
The Scientific Committee of the ICRIH consists of: Lars Fredrick Andresson (Sweden), Gustavo de Angel (Mexico), Sabine Go (Netherlands), Phillip Hellwege (Germany), Sebastian Kohl (Germany), Jean Kwon (USA), Martin Lengwiler (Switzerland), Jeronia Pons (Spain), and Grietjie Verhoef (South Africa).
Hosting proposals and enquiries should be addressed to: Prof. Robin Pearson, Professor Emeritus of Economic History, University of Hull (UK)
Email: ehsrp70@gmail.com
The full Call for Proposals is available in PDF format here: Full Call PDF.
20 May 2026
BOOK: Luka BRENESELOVIC and Arnd KOCH (eds.), Die europäische Bedeutung der Internationalen Kriminalistischen Vereinigung (IKV) 1889–1919 [Grundlagen des Strafrechts; 16] (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2026), 336 p. ISBN 978-3-7560-0794-3
Die Internationale kriminalistische Vereinigung war eine international erfolgreiche Vereinsgründung der Belle Époque. Initiiert von Franz v. Liszt, Adolphe Prins und G. A. van Hamel legte sie ihrer Tätigkeit die Prämisse zugrunde, dass Verbrechen und Strafe „ebenso sehr vom soziologischen wie vom juristischen Standpunkte aus ins Auge gefasst werden müssen“ (Art. 1, Satzung von 1889). Auf dieser Basis erhob die IKV kriminalpolitische Forderungen, die bis heute das moderne Bild des Strafrechts maßgeblich prägen. Der Band widmet sich aus einer vergleichenden Perspektive der Tätigkeit und legislatorischen Wirksamkeit der nationalen Landesgruppen der IKV und leistet so einen wichtigen Beitrag zur europäischen Geschichte des Strafrechts.
Contributors:
Mit Beiträgen von Prof. Dr. Attila Barna | Dr. Luka Breneselović, LL.M. | Prof. Dr. Yves Cartuyvels | Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Cyrille Fijnaut | Prof. Dr. José Franco-Chasán | Prof. Dr. Sabine Freitag | Dr. Urs Germann | Prof. Dr. Jørn Jacobsen | Mag. Dr. Nina Kaiser | Prof. Dr. Sylvia Kesper-Biermann | Prof. Dr. Arnd Koch | Prof. Dr. Dr. Michael Kubiciel | Prof. Dr. Dunja Milotić | Prof. Dr. Martin Sunnqvist | Dr. Richard Wetzell
Read more here: 10.5771/9783748915515.
19 May 2026
BOOK: Simon GILBERT, Droit administratif: le cours alpha. Naissance d'une discipline académique et doctrine originelles (1804-1814) [Méthodes du droit] (Paris: Dalloz, 2026), 162 p. ISBN 9782247249268, € 35
Peu de recherches ont jusqu'à présent permis d'identifier et d'analyser les premiers usages de l'expression « droit administratif » ni les conditions dans lesquelles l'enseignement de cette matière est apparu sous le Premier Empire. Le présent ouvrage revêt un triple objet : porter à la connaissance des contemporains du xxie siècle un corps de doctrines du Premier Empire aussi remarquables que méconnues inhérentes au caractère politique du droit administratif, qui forgent les conditions pour que la scriptogenèse de ce droit détermine son caractère autoritaire et qui jettent sur le droit contemporain une lumière aussi riche que nouvelle ; faire découvrir le contexte dans lequel est apparu cet enseignement académique en l'an XII (les motifs de son instauration, sa dévolution à une vingtaine de privatistes qui formèrent historiquement la première génération des professeurs de droit administratif, la manière dont ce droit a été représenté comme une matière académique d'un genre à part) ; mettre en relief le caractère mixte de ce droit dans les représentations prégnantes de l'époque, ce droit étant originellement considéré comme un composé de règles de droit public et de droit privé. La doctrine du Premier Empire assignait déjà à ce droit la fonction de déterminer des formes d'harmonie sociale, de fixer un point d'équilibre entre les lois civiles et politiques et de s'appliquer à certains rapports administratifs. Elle était convaincue que ce droit devait être en harmonie avec l'administration et fondé en la raison d'État. Elle a conceptualisé les conditions institutionnelles permettant de garantir que l'écriture matérielle du droit administratif soit compatible avec sa fonction politique.
On the author:
Simon Gilbert est professeur de droit public et doyen de la faculté de droit de l'université Paris-Est Créteil.
Read more here.
18 May 2026
PRIZE: Bader-Preis to legal historian Svit KOMEL (Ljubljana) (Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences)
Abstract:
Der Bader-Preis für die Geschichte der Wissenschaft und Technik geht in diesem Jahr an Svit Komel von der Universität Ljubljana. Ausgezeichnet wird seine Dissertationsschrift „Rule and measure. A history of juridical practices in the age of surveys“, in der er die Abschaffung von Grundlasten und kollektiven Landnutzungsrechten in der Habsburgermonarchie zwischen 1853 und 1895 untersucht. Komel zeigt, wie die Grundentlastung, also die Auflösung gemeinschaftlicher Rechte von Bauern an Wäldern und Weiden, nicht nur ein agrarpolitischer Einschnitt war, sondern Ausdruck einer tiefgreifenden Veränderung im Verhältnis zwischen Staat, Wissenschaft und lokaler Gesellschaft. Im Zentrum seiner Analyse steht das Konzept der Vermessung: Kommissare wurden in alle Winkel der Monarchie entsandt, um Gewohnheitsrechte zu erfassen und neu zu kategorisieren – ein Prozess, der auf das Wissen der bäuerlichen Bevölkerung zwingend angewiesen war.
More information at the ÖAW.
BOOK: Peter STACEY, The State in Machiavelli (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025), ISBN 9781009630351, €145,89
Abstract:
While historical scholarship has often downplayed the importance of Machiavelli's theory of the state, this study reconstructs the question of lo stato as the conceptual crux of his political philosophy. Peter Stacey offers a detailed reconstruction of the historical context from which Machiavelli's theory emerges, demonstrating how the intellectual and ideological contours of Machiavelli's thinking, as well as much of its content, were decisively shaped by conceptual apparatuses drawn from Roman philosophical, rhetorical and aesthetic discourse. Stacey further provides a sustained analysis of the development of Machiavelli's picture of the state from his earliest writings onwards, underlining the extent to which the Florentine draws deeply upon several key aspects of this intellectual inheritance in hitherto unacknowledged ways, while calling into question some of its cherished assumptions about the character of collective political entities. As Machiavelli's thinking unfolds across The Prince and the Discourses, Stacey illustrates how a strikingly novel conception of the body politic marks him out as the author of a distinctively new philosophy of the state.
Read more here: DOI 10.1017/9781009630351.
15 May 2026
SEMINAR: Cécile VIDAL, "L’argument du suicide dans le débat sur l’abolition de la traite et de l’esclavage en Grande-Bretagne et en France au XVIIIe siècle" (Paris: Sorbonne Université, 15 MAY 2026)
Cécile Vidal will intervene in the seminar hosted by the "Pôle Europe des Lumières" at Sorbonne Université on Wednesday 27 May at 17:30.
Title:
L’argument du suicide dans le débat sur l’abolition de la traite et de l’esclavage en Grande-Bretagne et en France au XVIIIe siècle.
More information here.
ADVANCE ARTICLE: Benjamin STRAUMANN, "From Individual virtue to the just state: Cicero and the legal nature of Roman political thought" (The Journal of Roman Studies) [OPEN ACCESS]
Abstract:
Scholarship on Roman political thought and its legacy, especially anglophone, has rapidly expanded over the last decade. The main drivers of this renewed attention to Roman political ideas and institutions are an historical interest in the collapse of the Roman republic; a philosophical interest in republicanism; and a growing sensitivity to the originality of Roman thinkers, especially Cicero, in contrast to the older view that they were simply derivative of the Greeks. In this essay I will discuss recent publications on Cicero and Roman political ideas. After offering an overview of key themes in this new scholarship, I seek to suggest promising directions for future research and encourage the growing interest in Roman political thought and Cicero in particular. Cicero provides a fascinating link between ideas, institutions and action on the ground and he is therefore with good reason at the centre of much of the rapidly expanding literature on Roman political thought. In addition, given his interest in developing a theory of justice as the foundation of the state (res publica), a focus on Cicero will help explore the legacy of republicanism from the angle of his ideas about justice while paying attention to scholarship placing these ideas into their historical and institutional context.
Read more here: DOI 10.1017/S0075435825100634.
CLH ARTICLE: Mohammad FADEL, Doctrinal change in Mālikī law: the case of judicial divorce on account of harm (Ḍarar) (Comparative Legal History, XIII (2025), nr. 2 (December), pp. 190-221)
This article explores doctrinal change in Mālikī law. Using the example of the distinctly Mālikī doctrine of a wife’s right to judicial divorce based on harm (ḍarar), it explores how this rule became the basic position of the school by no later than the eighth/fourteenth century, when Khalīl b Isḥāq included it in his authoritative Restatement of Mālikī law. The earliest sources of Mālikī law from the second/eighth century used the law of battery and principles of property law to protect a wife who suffered harm at the hands of her husband but did not provide her a right of divorce. Mālik, idiosyncratically, deemed the decision of the Quranic-mandated marital arbitrators to be binding. The combination of Mālikī commitments to a wife’s property rights, her right to bodily integrity and the broad powers they assigned to judges, beginning with marital arbitrators, along with the widespread inclusion in marriage contracts of covenants of good treatment that granted wives the right to divorce themselves if their husbands abused them, eventually led to the recognition of judicial divorce based on harm.
14 May 2026
PODCAST: Scott Andrew KEEFER, "Building the Palace of Peace: The Hague Conference of 1907 and Arms Control before the World War" [Voices of JHIL]
Abstract:
In Episode 9 of the Voices of JHIL podcast, we once again turn to history to discuss timely and pressing questions. This time, Scott Andrew Keefer joins us to discuss his article “Building the Palace of Peace: The Hague Conference of 1907 and Arms Control before the World War,” published in JHIL 9(1) (2007), 35–81, which explores the international legal dynamics of the naval arms race of the early 20th century. From a comparative historical analysis of the multilateral failure of the 1907 Hague Conference and the bilateral success of the 1902 Argentine-Chilean Naval Armament Treaty, we move on to broader questions regarding international law’s capacity to respond to global security issues.
On the speaker:
Dr. Scott Andrew Keefer, Senior Lecturer in History at Bournemouth University.
More information here.
13 May 2026
BOOK: Sandrine BAUME & David RAGAZZONI (eds.), Hans Kelsen on Constitutional Democracy Genesis, Theory, Legacies (Cambridge: CUP, 2026), ISBN 9781009230360 [OPEN ACCESS]
Abstract:
This volume challenges conventional interpretations by demonstrating that Hans Kelsen was far from being a purely formalist thinker. Instead, it highlights his profound and enduring engagement with the threats facing constitutional democracies. The political and institutional upheavals of interwar Europe significantly influenced Kelsen's evolving vision of democracy, as this volume shows. His contributions to twentieth-century democratic theory include groundbreaking insights into multiparty systems, mechanisms of moderation, minority protections, and judicial review. Furthermore, Kelsen's reflections on the crises and collapses of democracies during the 1930s remain strikingly relevant, offering valuable perspectives on contemporary challenges such as polarisation and populism. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Read the full book here: DOI 10.1017/9781009230360.
12 May 2026
BOOK: Laury SARTI, Mediterranean Connections: The Frankish Kingdoms and the Roman Empire (476–756) [The Medieval Mediterranean, 145, eds. Frances ANDREWS, Paul MAGDALINO, Jo Van STEENBERGEN, Larry SIMON, Daniel Lord SMAIL, Corisande FENWICK & Maria G. PARANI] (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2026), 240 p., ISBN: 978-90-04-74607-7, € 153.7
This monograph challenges the idea that Roman imperial authority in the West ended in 476. It shows how the Frankish realm maintained ties to the empire, with real separation only emerging in the late sixth century. Tracing enduring Frankish-Byzantine diplomacy, shared identities, religious controversy, and trade into the seventh century, it reveals a landscape of continued exchange rather than abrupt decline. Including previously overlooked sources, the study offers a new perspective on Frankish identity, imperial affiliation, and the evolving relationship between Rome, the empire, and the Merovingians from the fifth to the eighth century.
Laury Sarti, Ph.D. (2012), University of Hamburg, is Heisenberg Fellow at Heidelberg University.
1. Introduction1.1 Outline and Questions1.2 Prior Research1.3 Approach and Methods2. The Empire's Western Territories2.1 Odoacer and Theodoric2.2 One Empire2.3 476 in Retrospective2.4 The Empire and the West2.5 Results3. Kings of the Empire3.1 Clovis and Theudebert I3.2 Romans and Franks in Gaul3.3 The Empire's Kingdom3.4 Franko-Byzantine Exchanges3.5 Factors of Alienation3.6 Results4. Christian Community4.1 The Pope between East and West4.2 The Tree Chapters Controversy4.3 The Monothelite Controversy4.4 Results5. Mediterranean Connectivity5.1 Diplomatic Exchange in a 'Dark Age'5.2 Pilgrimages to the East5.3 Travel Routes and Trade5.4 Language and Knowledge Exchange5.5 Results6. Conclusions
BOOK: Bianca PREMO, La Ilustración a juicio. Litigantes y colonialismo en el imperio español [Historia del Derecho en América Latina, 1ª Edición] (México: Tirant lo Blanch, 2026), 514 p., ISBN 9788491198727
Este libro examina cómo las ideas ilustradas se pusieron a prueba en el mundo cotidiano de la justicia iberoamericana entre las personas esclavizadas e indígenas, y entre las mujeres del siglo XVIII. Se centra en los tribunales civiles, tanto en América como en España, como espacios clave de debate sobre los derechos naturales, la expansión de la esfera secular, el historicismo y la libertad. El libro enseña cómo leer el archivo judicial para sacar a la luz las ideas de personas no letradas, y redibuja la geografía de la modernidad para replantear el origen de nociones habitualmente atribuidas a Europa del Norte. Al entablar un diálogo con la historia del derecho, la historia intelectual y la historia social, subraya cómo la práctica legal transformó filosofías abstractas en herramientas prácticas. En conjunto, ofrece una reinterpretación poderosa de la Ilustración como un fenómeno forjado en el derecho colonial.
Bianca Premo es Profesora Distinguida Universitaria de Historia en la Florida International University, en Miami, Estados Unidos.
Introducción ¿Por qué es Ilustración?
Ilustración sin el siglo XVIII
Escritura, historia y escritura de la historia del Imperio español
La república de los iletrados
Una definición
Verificable y refutable: Un panorama del libro
Método comparativo
Regiones
Periodo de tiempo
Casos y litigantes
PARTE I: LIMONES Y LIMONADA: DEMANDAR EN EL IMPERIO ESPAÑOL
1. Agentes y poderes. Litigantes y escritores en los tribunales
Poderes: Papel y protocolo
Agentes: autoría y opciones de los litigantes
“Dios no paga”
Conclusión
2. Derecho y Ley: Ilustración jurídica en la filosofía y las políticas
El árbol de limones: Ilustración jurídica ecléctica
Limones: Derecho moderno temprano en el Imperio español
El árbol: Pensamiento jurídico de la ilustración
Jurisprudencia colonial
Bravo de Lagunas y la jurisdicción secular
Bravo de Lagunas y la esclavitud
Leyes sobre leyes
“Desembarazados y libres”: Leyes sobre eficiencia judicial
Jueces de bronce
El crecimiento de la jurisdicción secular
Agentes y poderes revisados
Conclusión
3. Números y valores: Conteo de casos en el imperio español
Números
Conteo de casos
Conteo de causas
Valores
La cultura orientada a la justicia de los Montes de Toledo
Umbrales y puertas: Las demandas de los subordinados coloniales
Conclusión
PARTE II: LUCES A PARTIR DE LITIGANTES
4. Pleitos y demandas. Conflictos conyugales en tribunales civiles
Justicia
Derechos
Una breve historia sobre los alimentos
Secularización e individualidad: Jurisdicción y disputas maritales
Derechos naturales y otras fuentes de derecho
Los casos civiles de las mujeres como Ilustración
Conclusión
5. Ayer y hoy. Estatus y costumbres indígenas
Ayer
Armonía y justicia
La lengua de la ley: Disputas legales en lengua zapoteca
Hoy
El mérito o la nueva ciencia del estatus
Costumbre hoy
Casos civiles indígenas como Ilustración
Conclusión
6. Ser y devenir: Libertad y demandas de esclavos
El comienzo de la libertad: Periodización e historiografía
Fines de las demandas por esclavitud
Jurisprudencia
Los esclavos en los tribunales eclesiásticos y civiles
Del amparo a los papeles
Autoconservación y sevicia
La personalidad jurídica de los esclavos
“La libertad que requieran los juicios”
La etapa de libertad
Conclusión: Los litigios de esclavos como Ilustración
Conclusión. ¿Por qué no Ilustración?
Find more on: Tirant.



















