Search

01 June 2026

CONFERENCE: L’antiesclavagisme : un idéal cosmopolite ? (1730-1830) (Paris: Collège de France, 18-19 JUN 2026)

 

(image source: Georges Morland, Slave Trade (Execrable Human Traffick, or The Affectionate Slaves) c. 1788. Collection of the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture. Domaine public/Initiative Europe/Sorbonne)


Abstract:

liée à la mondialisation des échanges commerciaux et à l’expansion des empires coloniaux, la diffusion de l’esclavage colonial a contribué à remettre en question la pertinence du cadre national dans les débats politiques. Qu’il s’agisse de la révolution haïtienne ou de l’appel au boycott des produits coloniaux, la plupart des événements et des décisions politiques étaient pensés en fonction de leurs répercussions à l’échelle mondiale. Longtemps centrée sur le cas britannique, l’historiographie s’est progressivement ouverte à la dimension transnationale de la lutte contre l’esclavage colonial. Aujourd’hui, l’antiesclavagisme apparaît comme un mouvement d’ampleur mondiale, qui s’est diffusé non seulement en Europe et aux États-Unis, mais aussi dans les Caraïbes, en Amérique latine et en Afrique. La conscience et la dimension mondiale du combat contre l’esclavage sont-elles liées à la défense d’un idéal cosmopolite ? La question se pose d’autant plus que l’esclavage colonial et la traite, qui atteignent un point culminant à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, incarnent plus que tout autre phénomène les contradictions de l’expansion de l’horizon du monde. En effet, la domination et l’exploitation d’une partie de l’humanité par une autre semblent rendre impossible l’émergence d’une communauté mondiale, morale et politique, enracinée dans l’idée d’une commune humanité, qui est au coeur de l’idéal cosmopolite. Le colloque international, qui se tiendra les jeudi 18 et vendredi 19 juin 2026 (respectivement à la Bibliothèque nationale de France, site Richelieu, et au Collège de France), poursuit trois objectifs principaux. Il s’agira, premièrement, d’évaluer la place et les enjeux de la mobilisation de l’idéal cosmopolite dans les débats sur l’esclavage colonial. Deuxièmement, il conviendra d’analyser les contradictions internes de l’antiesclavagisme, entre la revendication de l’égale dignité de tous les êtres humains et une approche différenciée des processus d’émancipation, fondée sur une vision hiérarchisée du monde. Enfin, nous montrerons comment l’étude de la diversité des mouvements antiesclavagistes à travers le monde permet de défendre une approche plurielle du cosmopolitisme, qui rompt avec son identification exclusive à la tradition philosophique occidentale.


Speakers:

ACKERMANN-KOENIGS Mathilde, Bielefeld University | EHESS | IHA Paris BESSONE Magali, Université Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne CABOT Andy, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France – Valenciennes DARRIULAT Gabriel, Collège de France | Bibliothèque nationale de France FERRADOU Matthieu, Université Paris Nanterre HOQUET Thierry, Université Paris Nanterre PITTS Jennifer, Université de Chicago RENARD Nils, Université Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne ROSSI Benedetta, University College de Londres SPIELER Miranda, The American University of Paris TUCCILLO Alessandro, Université de Turin VIDAL Cécile, EHESS 

See here for further details

SEMINAR: “Le rite réalise le droit“? – Rituals and the Law in the Ancient World (Marburg: Universität Marburg, 12–13 JUN 2026)

(image source: Universität Marburg)

“Le rite réalise le droit“? – Rituals and the Law in the Ancient World

Marburg University&Marburg Center for the Ancient World (MCAW)

In person participation: Marburg University, Room 00A26, Deutschhausstraße 12, 35032 Marburg

12–13 June 2026 (Friday–Saturday)

Program:

Friday, 12 June 2026
14:00. Introduction: Nils Heeßel (Marburg) and Constantin Willems (Marburg)

14:30. The Legal Value of Contractual Rites in Mesopotamia: Sophie Démare Lafont (Paris)

16:00. The Performative Nature of Sealing Clay Tablets: Steffen Jauß (Frankfurt)

17:00. In Search of the Lost Ritual. Ritual(s) and the implementation of Assyrian adê: Lionel Marti (Paris)

Saturday, 13 June 2026
09:00. The Role of Ritual in the Roman Legal Process: Grzegorz Blicharz (Cracow)

10:30. Formal Contracts in Roman Law and in the New Belgian Civil Code: Jean-François Gerkens (Liège)

11:30. Final Discussion, Conclusions: Nils Heeßel (Marburg) and Constantin Willems (Marburg)

The full Program is available in PDF format here: ProgramMCAW.

ADVANCE ARTICLE: Roxana BANU, "Constructing Imperial Authority: The Intersection of British Imperial Constitutional Law and Private International Law" (Oxford Journal of Legal Studies) [OPEN ACCESS]

 

(image source: OUP)

Abstract:

Historians and constitutional law scholars are starting to uncover the imperial dimensions of the British constitution. But our accounts of the nature of authority in the British imperial context remain incomplete without an engagement with private international law, which played a significant role in conceptualising imperial authority. This article focuses on the forgotten interplay between imperial constitutional law and private international law. It shows how key doctrinal principles of private international law were referenced either as alternatives to or counterparts of key imperial constitutional law principles. Imperial actors would appeal to one or another image of imperial authority constructed by either imperial constitutional law or private international law to gain more autonomy or to tighten control. Far from being a relic of the past, the significance of this history can be traced in contemporary cases and debates about the nature of authority in the UK and its overseas territories.

Read the article here: DOI 10.1093/ojls/gqag012.

29 May 2026

BOOK: Luigi NUZZO, Simulacri di sovranità. Una storia del diritto internazionale a Tianjin (Milano: Lefebvre Giuffrè, 2026). ISBN: 8828884312, pp. 394, € 57,00


ABOUT THE BOOK

Collana: Per la storia pensiero giuridico moderno.

Attraverso l'analisi delle costruzioni giuridiche, delle strategie diplomatiche e delle pratiche di governo mediante le quali, tra Otto e Novecento, Gran Bretagna, Francia, Stati Uniti, Germania e Italia ottennero e amministrarono le rispettive concessioni nei pressi della città di Tianjin, il volume ricostruisce una delle possibili storie del diritto internazionale. È una storia 'fangosa', come i territori occupati dalle potenze occidentali. Una storia che prende forma nella trama dei rapporti tra consolati, legazioni e ministeri, nelle negoziazioni con il governo e i funzionari cinesi, negli atti di espropriazione, nelle speculazioni degli imprenditori commerciali, nei progetti militari di governance internazionale e nei tentativi di riforma del sistema giurisdizionale. Oggetto di una molteplicità di discorsi giuridici e di pratiche sociali, le concessioni di Tianjin costituirono un vero e proprio laboratorio per sperimentazione di nuove forme giuridiche. Esse spinsero i giuristi a interrogarsi sui limiti del diritto internazionale e a immaginare nuove categorie interpretative per comprendere spazialità inedite, non riconducibili alle forme tradizionali di Stato, nazione o città. Lo studio dei lease agreements che ne costituirono il fondamento consente, pertanto, di cogliere come pratiche di governo e ardite costruzioni giuridiche abbiano spezzato il nesso tra potere governamentale, territorio e sudditi, modificando profondamente il concetto di sovranità e dando origine a nuovi spazi sociali. Al tempo stesso, gli atti appropriativi all'origine di quegli accordi consentono di guardare in modo più consapevole alla storia del diritto internazionale e al rapporto tra diritto e violenza, e permettono, ancora una volta, di identificare nell'occupazione l'atto fondativo di un nuovo ordine giuridico.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR 

Luigi Nuzzo è professore ordinario di Storia del diritto medievale e moderno e Storia del diritto internazionale presso l'Università del Salento.


More information with the publisher.

BOOK: Marietta AUER, Ralf SEINECKE & Stefan VOGENAUER (Hrsg.), Jan Schröder: Recht als Wissenschaft. Ein Kommentar (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2026), 353 p. ISBN 978-3-16-163653-0, €49

 

(image source: Mohr Siebeck)

Abstract:

Jan Schröders Recht als Wissenschaft ist schon wenige Jahre nach seinem Erscheinen ein neuer Klassiker zur Geschichte der juristischen Methodenlehre in der Neuzeit. In seiner dritten Auflage von 2020 handelt es von der Topik des 16. Jahrhunderts über die Historische Rechtsschule und das Kaiserreich bis zu den Methodenlehren der Deutschen Diktaturen und Demokratien des 20. Jahrhunderts. Der vorliegende Kommentar widmet sich in zehn Aufsätzen der kritischen Untersuchung von Jan Schröders gebildeten Epochen sowie der von ihm verwendeten Narrative und großen Linien. Zudem versammelt der Band alle zu den verschiedenen Auflagen erschienenen Rezensionen. Dadurch soll künftigen Forschungen zur Geschichte der juristischen Methodenlehre eine Grundlage geboten und zu alternativen Erzählungen angeregt werden.

Table of contents:

Vorwort
Verzeichnis der abgekürzt zitierten Zeitschriften
Querschnitte
Miloš Vec: Keine unpolitische Erzählung. Die vielen Kontexte von Recht als Wissenschaft - Daniel Damler: Redlicher Wandel ohne Fortschritt. Eine formale Analyse von Jan Schröders Recht als Wissenschaft - Arndt Kiehnle: Dogmatik - Geschichte - Methode. Recht als Wissenschaft und die gegenwärtige Dogmatik
Kommentare
Andreas Thier: Perspektivische Askese als Programm. Fortsetzung der mittelalterlichen Tradition und erste Neuerungen (1500-1650) - Wolfgang Forster: Vernunft und Geschichte, Wille und Erfahrung. Die Entdeckung der konstruktiven Vernunft und der Geschichte (1650-1800) - Bernd Mertens: Die Rechtsquellenlehre in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Die Begründung der positiven Rechtswissenschaft (1800-1850) - Hans-Peter Haferkamp: Methodenlehre an den Marionettenfäden des Rechtsbegriffs. Der Aufstieg der Rechtsprechung (1850-1933) - Thorsten Keiser: Ganzheitliche Umformung des liberalen Rechtskörpers. Die deutschen Diktaturen des 20. Jahrhunderts: Die nationalsozialistische Herrschaft (1933-1945) - Adrian Schmidt-Recla: Gesetzlichkeitswissenschaft in „Ostdeutschland". Die deutschen Diktaturen des 20. Jahrhunderts: Die Deutsche Demokratische Republik (1945-1990) - Susanne Paas: Perspektiven auf eine Zeitgeschichte der juristischen Methodenlehre. An den Grenzen des Rechtspositivismus. Westdeutschland (1945-1990)
Replik
Jan Schröder: Methodenprobleme der Methodengeschichte. Eine Replik
Rezensionen
1. Rezensionen zur ersten Auflage von Recht als Wissenschaft (2001)
2. Rezensionen zur zweiten Auflage von Recht als Wissenschaft (2012)
3. Rezensionen zu Rechtswissenschaft in Diktaturen (2016)

4. Rezensionen zur dritten Auflage von Recht als Wissenschaft (2 Bände, 2020)

Read more here

 

CLH ARTICLE: Jan WITTLIN, Coverage of the Jewish people by legal solutions granting compensation related to population transfers in twentieth century Europe (Comparative Legal History, XIII (2025), nr. 2 (December), pp. 252-276)

(Image source: Taylor&Francis)


Abstract:

While population transfers were an inseparable part of European policy in the twentieth century, providing compensation for immovable property left behind faced formidable legal, political and economic challenges. Compensation schemes frequently failed to be implemented or left claims of significant groups of migrants or their descendants unsettled, often for several decades. The Jewish minorities, present in most European countries for many centuries and featuring a unique combination of ethnic, religious and nationality related factors were often amongst the most severely impacted. A comparative analysis of the legal frameworks of prominent cases in twentieth century Europe – the population exchanges between Greece and Türkiye in 1923, the post-war border shifts of Poland and the resulting Bug River claims, expulsions from former German territories after World War II and the loss of Carpathian Ruthenia by Czechoslovakia to the Soviet Union – focuses on finding factors impacting Jewish communities, common solutions and evolutionary trends.


To read the article, please click here. Online access is free for members of the European Society for Comparative Legal History.

DOI: 10.1080/2049677X.2025.2579473

28 May 2026

CHAPTER: Lieven D'HULST, "Oeuvrer à la gloire nationale de la Belgique au 19e siècle. Traductions interlinguales et intralinguales des anciennes lois flamandes", in: Hilla KARAS & Hava BAT-ZEEV SHYLDKROT (eds.), Intralingual Translation. Beyond language and text (Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins, 2026), pp. 31-48 [OPEN ACCESS]

 

(image source: Benjamins)

Abstract:

Les politiques culturelles des nations européennes ont, au long du 19e siècle, encouragé et facilité l’accès aux sources écrites de leur histoire, moyennant des éditions savantes et populaires, ainsi que des transpositions en langue moderne. La Belgique, nation plurilingue née en 1830, possède un immense patrimoine en plusieurs langues et en plusieurs genres: des chansons populaires, des romans en vers, des légendes, ainsi que des lois et ordonnances rédigées en latin, en français et en flamand. Ces dernières forment un legs historique parallèlement nanti d’une valeur d’actualité: de nombreuses lois de l’Ancien régime comblent des lacunes juridiques du droit belge entièrement redevable au droit français. Or, ces lois sont souvent composées en flamand, une langue alors privée du statut de langue officielle réservé au français. Comment gérer ce legs à la fois historique et contemporain? Cette question fait débat au milieu du siècle; elle suscite un ensemble de réflexions d’une richesse insoupçonnée sur les enjeux de la traduction intralinguale et interlinguale: faut-il procurer des éditions des textes originaux composés en flamand historique et assortis de résumés ou commentaires en français contemporain, ou plutôt des traductions interlinguales en français historique, ou encore des traductions intralinguales en flamand contemporain? Bref, comment œuvrer à la gloire nationale sans perturber les subtils équilibres linguistiques en Belgique?

On the author, Lieven D'hulst (KULeuven): ORCID.

Read the chapter in open access here: DOI 10.1075/btl.168.02dhu.

27 May 2026

BOOK: Nicolas HUTEN, Basile MÉRAND & Nicolas SILD (eds.), Droit administratif et droit naturel. Premier regard (Paris: LexisNexis, 2026), ISBN 9782711943729, € 29

 

(image source: LexisNexis)

Abstract:

Le droit naturel classique n’a longtemps suscité d’intérêt que de la part des historiens du droit et des idées, convaincus à juste titre de son utilité pour la compréhension du droit contemporain. Après avoir récemment fait l’objet d’une certaine attention de la doctrine privatiste, le moment est venu pour la doctrine publiciste d’apporter sa contribution à ce renouveau. Telle est la finalité de cet ouvrage, qui envisage le droit administratif à l’aune des catégories du droit naturel classique. L’objet de ces pages pourra légitimement surprendre. À première vue, en effet, le droit administratif est un droit de la puissance publique, certes modéré par le contrôle du juge, mais qui semble exclure par principe toute approche sous l’angle de la justice ou de l’équité. Ce premier regard, qui en appelle d’autres à l’avenir, propose de revenir sur cette idée fort répandue. Sans nier la dimension politique du droit administratif, les contributions réunies dans le présent ouvrage montrent que ce droit est souvent marqué par la présence discrète d’une conception classique, c’est-à-dire gréco-romaine, du droit naturel, tant dans sa construction historique que dans l’application qu’en fait aujourd’hui le juge administratif dans les domaines les plus variés.

Contributiors:

 Miguel Ayuso, Henri Bouillon, Nicolas Huten, Alice Lassale, Basile Mérand, David Mongoin, Marjolaine Monot Fouletier, Jean Claude Ricci, Nicolas Sild.

Read more here

CONFERENCE: Droit de l'art, du patrimoine et des biens culturels: histoires, normes circulations [Journées internationales de la Société d'Histoire du Droit 2026] (Torino: Università di Torino, 4-7 JUN 2026)

 

(image source: SHD Torino)


The program for this year's Journées internationales of the Société d'Histoire du Droit, dedicated to the theme "Droit de l'art, du patrimoine et des biens culturels: histoires, normes circulations", has been published (cf. call earlier on this blog). 

More information here.


26 May 2026

SEMINAR: Diritto Romano e mestiere del giurista. Esperienze, confronti, prospettive [Associazione Italiana di Diritto Romano] (Università degli Studi di Milano, 4–5 JUN 2026)

Diritto Romano e mestiere del giurista. Esperienze, confronti, prospettive

Associazione Italiana di Diritto Romano
Convegno: in presenza

Luogo: Aula 431, Università degli Studi di Milano — Via Festa del Perdono 3, Milano
4–5 giugno 2026

Contatti: Segreteria organizzativa (aidrmilano2026@unimi.it)

Per il programma completo del convegno (PDF): UniMil


Programma:


Giovedì 4 giugno 2026


Ore 14.30
Saluti istituzionali

Stefano Simonetta — Prorettore
Giuseppe Ondei — Presidente Corte d’Appello di Milano
Angela Santangelo — Direttore Dipartimento di diritto privato e storia del diritto
Carla Masi Doria — Presidente AIDR


Prima sessione. Il diritto come scienza per l’uomo. Omne ius hominum causa constitutum
Presiede Chiara Tenella Sillani

Francesco Fasolino — Ordinario di Diritto romano, Università degli Studi di Salerno
Alberto Venturelli — Ordinario di Diritto civile, Università degli Studi di Brescia


Discussione


Ore 17.00
Seconda sessione. Diritto romano e teoria generale del diritto
Presiede Claudio Luzzati

Luigi Garofalo — Ordinario di Diritto romano, Università degli Studi di Padova
Carlo Nitsch — Ordinario di Filosofia del diritto, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II


Discussione


Cena sociale


Venerdì 5 giugno 2026


Ore 9.30
Terza sessione. Il metodo esegetico al vaglio della contemporaneità
Presiede Sandro Schipani

Pietro Sirena — Ordinario di Diritto civile, Università Commerciale “Luigi Bocconi”


Discussione


Ore 11.00
Tavola rotonda
Presiede Patrizia Giunti

Giovanni Canzio — Già primo Presidente di Cassazione
Francesco Della Rocca — Notaio, Consigliere e Coordinatore delle Commissioni scientifiche del CNN
Antonio Genovese — Già Presidente di Sezione di Cassazione
C. Orisel Hernández Aguilar — “Titular” di Diritto romano, Università di Pinar del Río (Cuba)
Thomas Rüfner — Ordinario di Diritto romano e Diritto civile, Università di Treviri (Germania); Giudice presso la Corte d’Appello di Coblenza
Aldo Schiavone — Emerito di Diritto romano, Scuola Normale Superiore


Discussione


Ore 14.30
Assemblea dei soci
Elezione dei rappresentanti nel Direttivo

BOOK: Dominika UCKIEWICZ, Accountability for War Crimes in the Policy of the Polish Government-in-Exile. A Legal and Historical Analysis (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff/Brill, 2026), ISBN 9789004759015, OPEN ACCESS

 

(image source: Brill)

Abstract:

This book excavates the often neglected role of the Polish government-in-exile within the Allied war crimes trial programme and post-1945 international law. Drawing on newly examined archival sources and biographies of key émigré lawyers, it reveals how Polish and other Eastern European jurists helped define the concept of accountability for wartime atrocities long before the Allies convened at Nuremberg. Combining legal and historical approaches, this book traces the Central and Eastern European influence on the UN War Crimes Commission and Allied policy, showing how their ideas about justice, responsibility, victim’s perspective, and law continue to resonate in modern interpretations of the legacy of Nuremberg.

Read more here: DOI 10.1163/9789004759015.

25 May 2026

FORMATION DOCTORALE : Ma thèse à l’ère de l’intelligence artificielle générative: enjeux, outils et pratiques situées [2e journée de formation commune de l’ED4 HiSTAR] (Louvain-la-Neuve, 5 JUN 2026)

(image source: UCLouvain)

ED4 HiSTAR
Journée de formation doctorale : en présentiel

Lieu : Louvain-la-Neuve
Date : vendredi 5 juin 2026

Inscription obligatoire avant le 22 mai 2026 à midi via le formulaire disponible sur le site HiSTAR:

Programme complet (PDF) :

Programme:

1e partie. Introduction théorique à l’IA, aperçu exploratoire de la diversité des applications possibles
9h45 – 12h15
Collège Erasme, salle polyvalente

Pascal Vangrunderbeeck — Conseiller pédagogique numérique et IA au Louvain Learning Lab
Comprendre l’effet Woaw des interfaces d’IAg et perspectives pour développer l’esprit critique

Nicolás Marín Bayona — UCLouvain
Voir sans regarder : analyse critique des dispositifs computationnels d’analyse d’image en Digital Art History

Camille Berny — UCLouvain
Analyser le risque ferroviaire dans les annales parlementaires avec l’IA : contraintes matérielles, protocoles de dépouillement et enjeux épistémologiques

12h15 – 13h30
Lunch

2e partie. Formation pratique
13h30 – 17h
Pool informatique Socrate 31-32

Jonathan Dedonder — Logisticien de recherches en sciences humaines, UCLouvain – IACCHOS
De l’outil au corpus : IA générative, art du prompting et posture épistémologique

Cet atelier propose une entrée à la fois pratique et critique dans l’usage de l’IA générative pour le traitement de corpus textuels. Il s’organise en trois temps : réflexion sur les enjeux liés à l’usage de l’IA dans la recherche (protection des données, acceptabilité disciplinaire, traçabilité méthodologique), panorama des outils disponibles et initiation au prompt engineering, suivis d’exercices pratiques et d’un retour réflexif collectif sur les enjeux épistémologiques liés à l’intégration de ces outils dans la recherche scientifique.

BOOK: Clifford ANDO, Mirko CANEVARO & Benjamin STRAUMANN (eds.), The Cambridge History of Rights, vol.I: The Ancient World [The Cambridge History of Rights, eds. Nehal BHUTA, Anthony PAGDEN & Mira L. SIEGELBERG] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026), ISBN 9781108837354, 120 GBP

 

(image source: CUP)

Abstract:
The ancient world existed before the modern conceptual and linguistic apparatus of rights, and any attempts to understand its place in history must be undertaken with care. This volume covers not only Greco-Roman antiquity, but ranges from the ancient Near East to early Confucian China; Deuteronomic Judaism to Ptolemaic Egypt; and rabbinic Judaism to Sasanian law. It describes ancient normative conceptions of personhood and practices of law in a way that respects their historical and linguistic particularity, appreciating the distinctiveness of the cultures under study whilst clarifying their salience for comparative study. Through thirteen expertly researched essays, volume one of The Cambridge History of Rights is a comprehensive and authoritative reference for the history of rights in the global ancient world and highlights societies that the field has long neglected.

Table of contents:

  • Introduction Clifford Ando, Mirko Canevaro and Benjamin Straumann
    • 1. To claim to protect claims: the generative discourse of Mesopotamian legal rights Seth Richardson
    • 2. The individual and the communal: early Confucian resources for human rights May Sim
    • 3. human rights in the Hebrew Bible? Sandra Jacobs
    • 4. Greek subjective rights? Justice, legal discourse, and legal institutions Mirko Canevaro and Linda Rocchi
    • 5. Aristotle on subjective rights Pia Campeggiani
    • 6. Do rights exist in Hellenistic philosophy? Jon Miller
    • 7. Rights in Ptolemaic Egypt Nadine Grotkamp
    • 8. Rights in Roman Republican thought Valentina Arena
    • 9. Ius in the subjective sense in classical Roman law Charles Donahue, Jr
    • 10. Rights and dignity in late ancient thought Kyle Harper
    • 11. Rights in late ancient law? Noel Lenski
    • 12. Rabbinic Judaism Alyssa M. Gray
    • 13. Sasanian law Maria Macuch.

    Read more here: DOI 10.1017/9781108938938

     


    22 May 2026

    BOOK: Ville KARI, The Classical Doctrine of Civil War in International Law [Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, eds. Larissa VAN DEN HERIK, &Jean D'ASPREMONT] (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026), ISBN 9781009218665

     

    (image source: CUP)

    Abstract:

    In the classical law of nations there was a doctrine of civil war. This book sets out to recover the forgotten legal tradition that shaped the modern world from 1575-1975. The result is an autonomous reassessment of four hundred years of the law of insurgencies and revolutions, both in state practice and in legal scholarship. Its journey through centuries of rebellion and the rule of law touches some of the most basic questions of international law across ages. What does it mean to stand among the nations of the world? Who should be welcomed among the subjects of international law, who should not, and who should decide? Its findings not only help make the classical doctrine understandable again, but also offer potential new insights for present-day lawyers about the origins, aspirations and vulnerabilities of the legal tradition with which they work today.
    Rad more here.

    CHAIR: Chaire Villey 2026, James Q. WHITMAN, « La transformation du rang social » (Paris: Université Paris II, Salle des Conseils, 21-22 MAY 2026)

     

    (image source: Institut Villey)

    Description of the chair:

    La Chaire Villey – Paris Jurisprudence Chair – est une conférence annuelle organisée à l’Université Panthéon-Assas par l’Institut Michel Villey. Elle est prononcée par un universitaire dont les travaux dans le domaine de la philosophie du droit et de l’histoire de la pensée juridique sont particulièrement remarquables.

    On the chair holder:

    James Q. Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School. He earned his B.A. and J.D. from Yale University and Law School and also holds an M.A. in European History from Columbia University and a Ph.D. in Intellectual History from the University of Chicago. From 1988-1989, Professor Whitman clerked for the Hon. Ralph K. Winter of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, then began his teaching career at Stanford University Law School. He has taught as a visiting professor at universities in France and Italy and has been a professor at Yale Law School since 1994. In 1996 he became the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law. Professor Whitman’s many articles have been published internationally and across disciplines. He has also been awarded numerous prizes and fellowships throughout his career. In 2008 he published The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial, which received an honorable mention, Silver Gavel Award, American Bar Association, 2009. His book The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War appeared in 2012. He was a John Simon Guggenheim Fellow in 2010-2011. His other scholarship includes an article, « The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty » published in the 2004 volume of The Yale Law Journal. His 2003 book, Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide Between America and Europe, published by the Oxford University Press, won the 2004 Distinguished Book Award of the Division of International Criminology of the American Society of Criminology.

    Read more here

    CLH ARTICLE: Mehmed BECIC, The Commercial Law for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1883: A legal transplant debate perspective (Comparative Legal History, XIII (2025), nr. 2 (December), pp. 222-251)

    (Image source: Taylor&Francis)

    Abstract: 
    The subject of this article is the Commercial Law for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1883. This law represented a legal transplant of German commercial law. At the time of its adoption in 1883, the Commercial Law did not represent a mirror of society. However, archival sources point to the fact that the government did not actually aim to impose a law that reflected the socio-economic conditions or business and commercial practices in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The imposition of this legal transplant was aimed at unifying commercial law in a unified customs territory. A contextual analysis, based on archival sources, economic policies and economic history, confirmed that the government was interested in imposing precisely this kind of legal solution (legal transplant) to achieve specific legal, social and economic effects and transform the existing socio-legal and economic system of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

    To read the article, please click here. Online access is free for members of the European Society for Comparative Legal History.

    DOI: 10.1080/2049677X.2025.2579472

    21 May 2026

    BOOK: Vid ŽEPIĆ, Favor debitoris. Varstvo dolžnika v rimskem pravu (Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta & Litteralis d.o.o., 2026), 496 p., ISBN 978-961-7162-25-7, € 79.90

    (image source: Knjigarna Pravna)

    Abstract: 

    Monografija obravnava razvoj načela favor debitoris oziroma krepitev varstva dolžnika v poznoantičnem rimskem pravu. Na podlagi analize cesarskih konstitucij od 4. do 6. stoletja prikazuje, kako so družbene, gospodarske in politične spremembe vplivale na zakonodajne ukrepe za zaščito dolžnika kot šibkejše stranke obligacijskega razmerja.

    Posebna pozornost je namenjena razlagi pogodb, omejevanju pogodbene avtonomije, prenehanju obveznosti ter izvršbi in zavarovanju terjatev. Raziskava obenem osvetljuje vpliv gospodarske krize, provincialne pravne prakse, stoiške filozofije in vzhodnorimskih pravnih šol na razvoj poznega rimskega prava ter pokaže, kako so ti procesi vplivali tudi na kasnejši razvoj socialnih korektivov v civilnem pravu.

    On the author:

    Dr. Vid Žepič je docent na Katedri za pravno zgodovino Pravne fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani.

    Table of contents:

    Uvod
         1.1 Razvojne težnje in dejavniki rimskega obligacijskega prava
         1.2 Metodologija
         1.3 Stanje raziskav

    (2) Razvojni dejavniki postklasičnega prava
         2.1 Cesarske konstitucije – ius novum
         2.2 Razvojni dejavniki

    (3) Favor debitoris in njegove pojavne oblike
         3.1 Favor debitoris – pojmovna analiza
         3.2 Razlaga pravnih poslov
         3.3 Omejevanje pogodbene avtonomije
         3.4 Prenehanje obveznosti
         3.5 Zavarovanje in izvršba

    (4) Sklep
         4.1 Favor debitoris v rimskem pravnem izročilu
         4.2 Razvojni dejavniki načela favor debitoris
         4.3 Pot do materializacije civilnega prava

    (5) Zusammenfassung

    Find more on Pravna fakulteta Univeza v Ljubljani & Knjigarna pravna.

    BOOK: Paolo AMOROSA, Ville ERKILLÄ & Karolina STENLUND (eds.), Times of Global Injustice. Temporalities of Power and Community Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries [Routledge Studies in Law, Rights and Justice] (London: Routledge, 2026), 388 p. ISBN 9781032873770, € 190

     

    (image source: Routledge)

    Abstract:

    Time is an essential dimension of our shared understandings of the historical significance or fairness of a particular event or situation. The ways time is constructed, however, are characterised by a plurality of diverse and sometimes inconsistent representations. This book examines the uses of different conceptualizations of time in explaining injustice and justice in society from an interdisciplinary perspective.  It is the temporal representations that are the focus of this book here: how and by whom are they constructed, how do they weave together or fray in the process of working through temporary or permanent injustices, and what spaces are made or quashed for different understandings of time? The volume gathers scholars from different backgrounds with expertise from law, history, politics and international relations, philosophy, and sociology to examine the temporality of (in)justice in society. The chapters of the book are integrated around a coherent central theme: the unavoidable intertwining of time and justice. As well as addressing the lived processes of collectively coming to terms with temporal experiences and justice, the book work also discusses the different disciplinary ways of making sense of such processes and the strengths and pitfalls of each approach. The collection will be of interest to researchers and students of legal theory, international relations, global history, memory studies, and political philosophy.

    Table of contents:

    1.Introduction. Times of Global (In)justice.
    Paolo Amorosa, Ville Erkkilä, Karolina Stenlund

    Part I: Offcial Time

    2. Why Do People Move? Governing the Time and Space of Climate Migration.
    Usha Natarajan

    3. Yesterday’s tomorrows and today’s: Future-making in Swedish permit-granting procedure
    Agnes Hellner 

    4. As If a Foreign Country: Evidence Law and Settler Colonial Sovereignty.
    Genevieve Renard Painter

    5. State redress for involuntary sterilisation in Sweden.
    Malin Arvidsson

    6. Urgency and Exceptional Time: The State of Emergency as an institution of official time.
    Tuukka Brunila

    Part II: Emancipatory Time 

    7. How to Overcome an Unjust Past? Conflicts of Historicities in the Contemporary World.
    Marek Tamm & Zoltán Boldizsár Simon

    8. Urgency! At the European Court of Human Rights: Hope, Haste and Climate Justice.
    Zoë Jay

    9. Existential time and climate in/justice at the end of the world.
    Andrew R. Hom

    10.Law, Time, and Tradition.
    Sebastián Machado

    11.Stitching as reparation: expanding narrations of the past and imagining the future.
    Helena Alviar García & Laura Betancur Restrepo

    Part III: Everyday Time

    12.Authoritarian Regimes and the ’Everyday Time.’ The trial of Greta Wolff.
    Ville Erkkilä

    13. Times of Hermeneutical Injustice: Memory Struggle in the Public Discussion around the Attack on the Elias Lönnrot Monument.
    Ulla Savolainen

    14. Rehearsing the Future Through Design.
    Sara Duell

    15. The Shape of Time to Come: The History of the Future in Teleological legal reasoning.
    Karolina Stenlund

    16. Conclusions: Just(ice) in Time

    Bo Stråth

     On the editors:

    Paolo Amorosa is University Lecturer of International Law at the Law Faculty, University of Helsinki, Finland. Ville Erkkilä is an Academy Research Fellow at the Centre for European Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland. Karolina Stenlund is a university researcher and team leader at the Research Council of Finland’s Centre of Excellence in Law, Identity, and the European Narratives (EuroStorie), based at the University of Helsinki, Finland.

     Read more here.

    CALL FOR PROPOSALS: International Conference on Risk and Insurance in History (ICRIH) [HOSTING PROPOSALS FOR 2028–2029]

    (image source: RKD Research)

    The Scientific Committee of the International Conference on Risk and Insurance in History (ICRIH) has issued a call for proposals to organize and host the next edition of the conference in the summer of 2028 or, at the latest, 2029.

    Since its inaugural meeting in Seville in 2019, followed by conferences in Basel (2022) and Warsaw (2025), the ICRIH has established itself as a major interdisciplinary forum for scholars working on the historical and long-term dimensions of risk and insurance. Previous editions brought together researchers from across the world and covered topics ranging from marine insurance and maritime law, insurance and the Atlantic slave trade, and micro-insurance, to modern financial instruments and alternative risk transfer mechanisms.

    The Scientific Committee invites proposals from institutions interested in hosting the next conference. The selected organizing committee will work closely with the Scientific Committee, which will provide support regarding conference structure, call for papers, keynote speakers, paper evaluation, awards, and fundraising. A dedicated conference website is also being developed by the University of Basel.

    The ICRIH welcomes interdisciplinary engagement from fields including economic, business, financial, legal, social, and cultural history, as well as economics, sociology, anthropology, management studies, and legal studies. The conference has also traditionally included participation from professionals in the insurance industry alongside established and early-career researchers.

    The Scientific Committee of the ICRIH consists of: Lars Fredrick Andresson (Sweden), Gustavo de Angel (Mexico), Sabine Go (Netherlands), Phillip Hellwege (Germany), Sebastian Kohl (Germany), Jean Kwon (USA), Martin Lengwiler (Switzerland), Jeronia Pons (Spain), and Grietjie Verhoef (South Africa).

    Hosting proposals and enquiries should be addressed to: Prof. Robin Pearson, Professor Emeritus of Economic History, University of Hull (UK)

    Email: ehsrp70@gmail.com 

    The full Call for Proposals is available in PDF format here: Full Call PDF.

    20 May 2026

    BOOK: Luka BRENESELOVIC and Arnd KOCH (eds.), Die europäische Bedeutung der Internationalen Kriminalistischen Vereinigung (IKV) 1889–1919 [Grundlagen des Strafrechts; 16] (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2026), 336 p. ISBN 978-3-7560-0794-3

     

    (image source: InLibra)

    Abstract:
    Die Internationale kriminalistische Vereinigung war eine international erfolgreiche Vereinsgründung der Belle Époque. Initiiert von Franz v. Liszt, Adolphe Prins und G. A. van Hamel legte sie ihrer Tätigkeit die Prämisse zugrunde, dass Verbrechen und Strafe „ebenso sehr vom soziologischen wie vom juristischen Standpunkte aus ins Auge gefasst werden müssen“ (Art. 1, Satzung von 1889). Auf dieser Basis erhob die IKV kriminalpolitische Forderungen, die bis heute das moderne Bild des Strafrechts maßgeblich prägen. Der Band widmet sich aus einer vergleichenden Perspektive der Tätigkeit und legislatorischen Wirksamkeit der nationalen Landesgruppen der IKV und leistet so einen wichtigen Beitrag zur europäischen Geschichte des Strafrechts.

    Contributors:

    Mit Beiträgen von Prof. Dr. Attila Barna | Dr. Luka Breneselović, LL.M. | Prof. Dr. Yves Cartuyvels | Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Cyrille Fijnaut | Prof. Dr. José Franco-Chasán | Prof. Dr. Sabine Freitag | Dr. Urs Germann | Prof. Dr. Jørn Jacobsen | Mag. Dr. Nina Kaiser | Prof. Dr. Sylvia Kesper-Biermann | Prof. Dr. Arnd Koch | Prof. Dr. Dr. Michael Kubiciel | Prof. Dr. Dunja Milotić | Prof. Dr. Martin Sunnqvist | Dr. Richard Wetzell

    Read more here: 10.5771/9783748915515