Palgrave is publishing a new book
on the concept of political deference in British politics from the 18th
century to the present day.
ABOUT THE BOOK
This book explores the concept of
deference as used by historians and political scientists. Often confused and
judged to be outdated, it shows how deference remains central to understanding
British politics to the present day. This study aims to make sense of how political
deference has functioned in different periods and how it has played a crucial
role in legitimising British politics. It shows how deference sustained what
are essentially English institutions, those which dominated the Union well into
the second half of the twentieth century until the post-1997 constitutional
transformations under New Labour. While many dismiss political and
institutional deference as having died out, this book argues that a number of
recent political decisions – including the vote in favour of Brexit in June
2016 – are the result of a deferential way of thinking that has persisted
through the democratic changes of the twentieth century. Combining close
readings of theoretical texts with analyses of specific legal changes and
historical events, the book charts the development of deference from the
eighteenth century through to the present day. Rather than offering a
comprehensive history of deference, it picks out key moments that show the
changing nature of deference, both as a concept and as a political force.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Catherine Marshall is
Professor of British Studies at CY Cergy Paris Université, France. Her research
focuses mainly on the history of ideas in mid-Victorian England and the legacy
of some of those ideas on twentieth and twenty-first century Britain. She
teaches British history and the history of political ideas.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction: Why ‘Deference’?
The Constitution of Political
Deference
Deference and the Politics of
Notables
Walter Bagehot, the ‘Darwin of
Deference’
The Dilemma(s) of Voluntary
Deference in the Fin De Siècle
The Challenges to Voluntary
Deference (1911–1945)
Voluntary Deference in Crisis
(1945–1972)
The Rejection of Rational
Deference (1973–1997)
The ‘Afterlife’ of Deference
(1997–2016)
Conclusion: Deference for the
Democratic Age
More info here
No comments:
Post a Comment