Search

Showing posts with label Marriage and Divorce Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marriage and Divorce Law. Show all posts

02 July 2026

BOOK: Julia HÜTTEN, German Identity, Intermarriage, and Divorce in Samoa (1900–1914) [Global Perspectives on Legal History, vol. 27, eds. Marietta AUER, Thomas DUVE & Stefan VOGENAUER] (Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, 2025),192 p., ISBN 978-3-944773-52-0, € 18,21

(image source: MPILHLT)

Abstract:

Germany’s colonial past is again at the center of public debate. This book offers a focused contribution: a study of how the German administration in Samoa (1900–1914) used family law as a tool of colonial governance. Examining marriage, divorce, citizenship, legitimacy, and maintenance, Julia Hütten shows how rules on the most intimate matters became instruments of colonial power and a mirror for ideas of ‘Germanness’.

Interethnic families were already part of Samoan society when the imperial flag was raised in Apia in 1900. The new government tried to sort residents into two personal jurisdictions, ‘foreigner’ and ‘native’, yet people of mixed descent rarely fit neatly into either. The German Civil Code (BGB), which had only recently been enacted, granted citizenship to foreign wives of German husbands, but many long-standing unions in Samoa had never been registered as civil marriages. Officials responded by planning to prohibit future interethnic marriages and by compiling a register of so-called ‘half-castes’ born to unregistered unions, thereby expanding the reach of foreign jurisdiction. The formal ban on mixed marriages arrived in 1912, tightening these boundaries still further.

Fault-based divorce procedures, unfamiliar in Samoan practice, also unsettled households by compelling spouses to assign blame and expose private life to official judgment. These interventions did not simply transplant metropolitan law; they interacted with Samoan custom, missionary influence, and local knowledge, producing outcomes negotiated by officials, petitioners, and communities.

By tracing cases and policies across these 14 years, the book illuminates how colonial law marked racial boundaries, structured belonging, and reordered daily life in Samoan-German households. It also opens a window onto the German Empire itself: its anxieties about race and respectability, its administrative improvisation at the edge of empire, and the contested meanings of citizenship within a plural legal order.

On the author:

Julia Hütten is a legal historian whose research traces family law and identity in the German colonial Pacific. She holds a doctorate in law, having academic backgrounds in anthropology and information science. She held research positions at the Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory.

Table of contents:

Foreword

List of Charts, Tables and Images

Introduction

Chapter 1: Samoa, Pearl of the South Sea

1.1 Morality and the Samoan climate

1.2 European contact and the matai political system

Chapter 2: German Identity and Colonialism

2.1 Samoan courtship ans marriage

2.2 Taupou, abstinence, and women’s sexuality

2.3 Marriage of Samoans in the Western manner

2.4 Marriage under German law

2.5 Marriages between Samoans and Chinese

Chapter 3: Breaking Up Families: The Ban on Interethnic Marriage

3.1 Changing views on race and ethnicity

3.2 Citizenship law and Deutschtum

3.3 The example set by German Southwest Africa

3.4 Defining the legal classification »native« in the German colonies

3.5 The Mischehenverbot in Samoa

3.6 Planning the Mischehenverbot

Chapter 4: Divorce and Matters of Family Law in the German Courts of Samoa

4.1 New policies in the regulation of divorce in the German empire

4.2 Application of family law from the BGB in Samoa

4.3 Grounds for divorce under the BGB

4.4 Divorces among the faʻa papālagi

4.5 Divorces among Samoans in the German courts

4.6 Women’s testimony in divorce

4.7 A change of stance of Governor Solf in 1907?

4.8 Maintenance

4.9 Maintenance of illegitimate children

4.10 Maintenance after the 1912 Mischehenverbot

4.11 Samoan divorce cases (a selection)

4.12 The case of Blanche Reid and the "Lifestyle Test"

4.13 Why the "Lifestyle Test ?"

4.14 The German interracial marriage debate (Mischehendebatte) in May 1912

Conclusion

Appendix I: Samoan terms

Appendix II: Translation of Dr. Wilhelm Solf’s opening statement to the German parliament (May 2, 1912)

Bibliography

Find more on: MPILHLT & epubli.

15 May 2026

CLH ARTICLE: Mohammad FADEL, Doctrinal change in Mālikī law: the case of judicial divorce on account of harm (Ḍarar) (Comparative Legal History, XIII (2025), nr. 2 (December), pp. 190-221)


(Image source: Taylor&Francis)

Abstract:

This article explores doctrinal change in Mālikī law. Using the example of the distinctly Mālikī doctrine of a wife’s right to judicial divorce based on harm (ḍarar), it explores how this rule became the basic position of the school by no later than the eighth/fourteenth century, when Khalīl b Isḥāq included it in his authoritative Restatement of Mālikī law. The earliest sources of Mālikī law from the second/eighth century used the law of battery and principles of property law to protect a wife who suffered harm at the hands of her husband but did not provide her a right of divorce. Mālik, idiosyncratically, deemed the decision of the Quranic-mandated marital arbitrators to be binding. The combination of Mālikī commitments to a wife’s property rights, her right to bodily integrity and the broad powers they assigned to judges, beginning with marital arbitrators, along with the widespread inclusion in marriage contracts of covenants of good treatment that granted wives the right to divorce themselves if their husbands abused them, eventually led to the recognition of judicial divorce based on harm.

To read the article, please click here. Online access is free for members of the European Society for Comparative Legal History.

DOI: 10.1080/2049677X.2025.2579343

12 February 2025

BOOK: Mathieu TILLIER, Naïm VANTHIEGHEM, Mariages et séparations en Égypte au Moyen Âge. Actes inédits sur papyrus, papier, parchemin et tissu [Archiv für Papyrusforschung; Beihefte] (Berlin: De Gruyter 2024). ISBN: 9783111450339

(Image source: De Gruyter)


One day of December 875, the weaver ʿUmar b. Mūsā, married Ḥalīma bint Nafīs before illustrious witnesses from Fusṭāṭ. Some six centuries later, in the spring of 1411, Lady Fāṭima bint Fatḥ al-Dīn celebrated a second wedding with Ṭūġān, a promising Mamluk officer, and hosted him with her retinue in her Cairene palace. Present-day historians would know nothing of them had their marriage contract not withstood the ravages of time, as have the hundred or so documents that Mathieu Tillier and Naïm Vanthieghem are publishing, translating and studying for the first time in this volume. Rich or poor, free or enslaved, the men and women of Medieval Egypt adopted the habit, from at least the eighth century CE onwards, of having their unions recorded in order to lay down the terms and conditions of their marriage. Dissolution by repudiation (ṭalāq) or amicable divorce (ḫulʿ) were also entrusted to the care of notaries. The hitherto unpublished documents collected here, which span across the Abbasid, Fatimid, Ayyubid and Mamluk periods, provide a unique insight into matrimonial strategies among commoners as well as elite members, and into marital relationships and legal practices, both in the capital and in the Egyptian countryside. After a first part devoted to the editing of marriage contracts and divorces deed as well as a few related documents, the authors offer a detailed study of matrimonial practices in medieval Egypt based on Arabic documents.


On the authors

Mathieu Tillier, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Naïm Vanthieghem, IRHT-CNRS, Paris, France.


More information can be found here.

03 December 2024

CONFERENCE: Désunions : La séparation du couple à l’initiative de l’Église dans le monde catholique (Poitiers: CESCM, 6 DEC 2024) [ONLINE]

(Image source: Carnets du CESCM)


GENERAL DATA

Journée soutenue par le CESCM (UMR 7302), le CRIHAM (UR 15507) et l’axe 2 de la MSHS de Poitiers (UAR 3565)

  • 6 décembre 2024
  • Lieu : salle Gaston Berger du CESCM / Hôtel Berthelot, 24 rue de la Chaîne, POITIERS.
  • Pour assister à la journée en distanciel merci de vous inscrire sur ce formulaire : https://forms.gle/bpmx8LZAW3kAobXeA. Le lien vous sera envoyé la veille.


SCHEDULE

  • 9h – Accueil
  • 9h15 – Introduction par Emilie Kurdziel et Marie Walin

Session du matin modérée par Justine Audebrand (U. Poitiers, CESCM)

  • 9h45 – Emilie Kurdziel (U. Poitiers, CESCM) : Les séparations forcées de couples cléricaux au XIe siècle
  • 10h25 – Nahema Hanafi (U. Angers, TEMOS) : Les prétentions dangereuses. La nullité du mariage des castrats selon le juriste Charles Ancillon
  • 11h20 – Mariela Fargas Peñarrocha (U. Barcelone, GEHMO) [distanciel] : Enlèvement et confinement : trajectoires féminines de séparation conjugale. Analyse de cas dans la Barcelone moderne

Session de l’après-midi modérée par Vincent Gourdon (CNRS, Centre Roland Mousnier)

  • 14h – Marie Walin (U. Poitiers, CRIHAM) : L’Église et ses représentants, des soutiens pour les femmes dans des procédures d’annulation de mariage en Espagne (1777-1840)
  • 14h40 – Léon Snyers (professeur agrégé d’histoire, lycée Lamartine (Paris)) : Défendre la séparation de corps : un pis-aller catholique face au projet de loi du divorce (1876-1884)
  • 15h20 – Aïcha Limbada (École Française de Rome, Centre d’Histoire du XIXe siècle) : L’accompagnement religieux des fidèles catholiques en cas de séparation matrimoniale (France, 1884-années 1920)
  • 16h – Conclusions par Emilie Kurdziel et Marie Walin

More information can be found here.


30 January 2024

JOURNAL: Droits: Revue française de theorie juridique, de philosophie et de culture juridiques (LXXVI, 2022/2: Parenté, moeurs et droits/5)

(Image source: Cairn)


SOMMAIRE

Articles

  • La représentation successorale dans le droit coutumier de la période moderne (Marta Peguera Poch)
  • Peut-on parler d’une biologisation du droit de la parenté au moyen âge ? La durée de la grossesse chez cynus de pistoie, Albéric de Rosate et Pierre Jacobi (Maaike van der Lugt, Charles de Miramon)
  • User du bon mot pour défendre son bon droit. Succession royale et enjeux de parenté de 1661 à 1715 (Aurore Causin)
  • Bref aperçu de l’endogamie chez les ducs et pairs de l’époque moderne (Christophe Levantal)
  • Les frontières mouvantes de l’inceste (Laurent Barry)
  • Misyār, misfār, miṣyāf… les avatars récents du mariage « islamique » non conventionnel (Édouard Conte)

Variétés

  • De l’utilité de la reconnaissance d’état (Chloé de Perry-Sibailly)
  • Le formalisme juridique d’apparence dans L’enracinement de Simone Weil (Londres – 1943) (Amaury Giraud)
  • Droit et sociologie dialectique. Les mutations du droit selon Michel Freitag (Baptiste Rappin)
  • Gramsci, Luhmann et le droit (Rodolphe Royal)
  • Introduction à la traduction des « prolégomènes aux principes de la peine » de Herbert Hart (Benoît Basse, Nicolas Nayfeld)
  • Prolégomènes aux principes de la peine [traduit par Benoît Basse et Nicolas Nayfeld] (Herbert Hart)


More information can be find here.

22 January 2024

JOURNAL: Droits: Revue française de theorie juridique, de philosophie et de culture juridiques (LXXV, 2022/1: Parenté, moeurs et droits/4)

(Image source: Cairn)


SOMMAIRE

Articles

  • Le caractère unique de la parenté agnatique romaine (Emmanuelle Chevreau)
  • Parricide (Jean-Marie Carbasse)
  • La puissance paternelle romaine entre dogmatique juridique et évolution des mœurs (Elena Giannozzi)
  • La dévolution des noms durant le Haut Moyen Âge (Ve-Xe siècle) (Christian Settipani)
  • Les familles et l’impôt des personnes physiques (Thierry Lambert)
  • L’adoption, une longue évolution (Laurent Leveneur)
  • L’homme enceint (Cyrille Duvert)

Variétés

  • Se souvenir du Pays de sapience… Résilience coutumière et mémoire du droit normand au XIXe siècle (Gilduin Davy)
  • De Kant à Schopenhauer. La métaphysique aux sources du positivisme juridique (Alexandre Viala)
  • Le[s] droit[s] naturel[s] de H. L. A. Hart (Bertrand Guillarme)
  • La conception du parlement comme un système juridique ou les difficultés de la théorie hartienne (Dylan Swolarski)
  • De la science politique (D’hier à aujourd’hui : occidentalisme, descriptivisme, refus du temps long et de l’interdisciplinarité) (Robert Charvin)

Billet

  • Les mutants de Panurge. « Iel est un autre » (Éric Desmons)


More information can be found here.

08 February 2023

JOURNAL: Droits: Revue française de theorie juridique, de philosophie et de culture juridiques (LXXIV, 2021: Parenté, moeurs et droits/3)


SOMMAIRE

Articles

  • Le mariage more danico: entre pratiques matrimoniales, identités et discours historiographiques [Pierre Baudin]
  • De quoi la bâtardise est-elle le stigmate au Moyen Âge ? Réflexions partagées sur une recherche historique en cours [Carole Avignon]
  • Formules répudiatrices dans le droit musulman au Moyen Âge [Nejmeddine Khalafallah]
  • La parenté du fonctionnaire [Anne Foubert]
  • L’évolution de la parenté au prisme de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme [Joël Andriantsimbazovina]
  • Le nom: évolutions et résurgences. Réflexions à propos de la loi no 2022-301 du 2 mars 2022 relative au choix du nom issu de la filiation [Cecile Pérès]


Variétés

  • Les racines africaines de la guerre [William Edward Burghardt Du Bois]
  • Un bilan impitoyable de la guerre d’Indochine [Annie Lacroix-Riz]
  • Les gardiens des noires illusions. Les professeurs à la faculté de droit de Paris et les tentations autoritaires [Mathieu Soula]
  • Deux thèmes libéraux chez Jean-Jacques Rousseau [Bernard Quiriny]
  • Eugène Protot (1829-1921): « ministre de la Justice », communard et patriotard [Martin Gallié]
  • Un titre de loi peut-il convaincre ? Étude sur l’argument a rubrica [Julien Risser]
  • Des subjectivités reconfigurées. Réflexions sur la « barémisation » des indemnités prud’homales [Antonin Schultz]


More information can be found here

17 November 2020

BOOK: Alain LOTTIN (Ed.), La désunion du couple sous l'Ancien Régime. L'exemple du Nord (Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2019 - 2e édition). ISBN: 2757424548, pp. 204, € 18,00

 

ABOUT THE BOOK

2e édition, collection: Histoire et civilisations

Les remises en cause de la famille et du mariage caractérisent notre époque, les débats sur la contraception, l'avortement, le divorce se succèdent. L’Histoire est « fille de son temps ». Sur le thème de la désunion du couple, les auteurs ont donc fouillé le passé. Ils étudient les ruptures de fiançailles, les concubinages, les mariages clandestins, les adultères, les « divorces », les annulations de mariage et ils retracent sur ces sujets les comportements de nos aïeux à partir des précieux documents provenant de l’archevêché de Cambrai et concernant un vaste territoire du Nord de la France et de la Belgique. À travers les complaintes des filles séduites, les justifications de séducteurs ou de maris abusifs et les témoignages de voisins curieux et bavards, des tranches de vie pittoresque et parfois truculentes sont ainsi ressuscitées.

ABOUT THE EDITOR

Alain Lottin (1935-2017) était professeur d'histoire moderne, spécialiste notamment des questions religieuses, sociales et politiques des provinces françaises du Nord, aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Préface

Philippe Guignet

Introduction

Alain Lottin

Chapitre 1.

L'obstacle surmonté : les dispenses

Philippe Malolepsy (essentiellement d'après les TER de P. Malolepsy et R. Rychalski)

Chapitre 2.

Les fiançailles rompues ou empêchées

Alain Lottin et Kathleen Pasquier (essentiellement à partir des TER de S. Delloye et K. Pasquier)

Chapitre 3.

Les mal-unis

Jean-Renaud Machuelle (essentiellement d’après les TER de J.-R. Machuelle et D. Morin)

Chapitre 4.

Séducteurs, volages et infidèles

Jean-Renaud Machuelle (essentiellement d’après les TER de J.-R. Machuelle et D. Morin)

Chapitre 5.

Les « divorces »

Alain Lottin et Guy Savelon (essentiellement d’après les travaux et TER de J.-L. Geoffroy, L. Kaczmarek, A. Lottin, G. Savelon, J.-L. Vandecavaye)

Chapitre 6.

Les demandes d’annulation de mariage

Jean-Renaud Machuelle (essentiellement d’après les TER de J.-R. Machuelle et D. Morin)

Chapitre 7.

Le couple et sa désagrégation

Alain Lottin

Conclusion

Alain Lottin

Annexes

Les auteurs


More information with the publisher.

20 January 2020

CONFERENCE: Separated Beds – Interwoven Property: Divorce in Context 1600-1900 (Vienna, 15-16 May 2020) (DEADLINE: 28 February 2020)



We learned of a call for papers for a conference on separation consequences (in family law) during the period 1600-1900. Here the call: 

Location: Austria, Vienna
Venue: University of Vienna
Hosted by: OeNB research project “Separated beds - Interwoven Property: Regulation of Separation Consequences since the 16th Century”, in cooperation with the Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies and the Department of History of the University of Vienna.
Date: 15.05.2020 – 16.05.2020
Deadline: 28.02.2020

Call for Papers

Until the introduction of civil marriage, marriages in all European territories could be entered into and separated only in accordance with the conditions of religions and denominations respectively. Today the divorce of civil marriage is common practice in European societies. The fact that religious marriages regulated by faith communities could be divorced is still not widely conveyed. The historical studies that appeared in recent years make it clear that religions and denominations respectively differed as to the type of divorce they allowed, what divorce grounds they recognized, and whether they gave the divorced spouses the right to remarry. Divorced Catholics were forbidden to enter into a new marriage until the death of their husband or wife. On the other hand, the matrimonial property regime was partly independent of religion or denomination, and thus also the regulation of the divorce consequences, which depended particularly on local traditions until civil codes were passed.

Depending on the historically different divorce possibilities and the density of the remaining sources, the documents produce in the context of marital conflicts and divorces open up a wide field of research: With the exception of uncontested divorces, it is possible to analyze how plaintiffs and defendants argued in court and what arguments judges recognized or rejected as divorce grounds. The certificates submitted and witnesses mentioned allow one to reconstruct the relationship networks of the wives and the husbands. Divorce settlements and civil proceedings regulating the divorce consequences indicate who received custody of children, how the property of the couple was divided and how maintenance was regulated. They provide insight into the ways the couple had made a living and how the divorced spouses intended to make a living in the future. Recent studies show that the economic position of women varied greatly depending on the prevailing matrimonial property regime and the marriage contract which was agreed upon. Especially in regions with community of goods, it was often the women who, as daughters or widows, brought a house and farm or a trade and business license into the marriage. The sources thus allow conclusions to be drawn on the property and wealth of women and show the variety of trades and occupations pursued by women before and also after marriage, which are usually beyond the reach of historians. Recent studies have also indicated that divorce -  independent of denomination or religion – was not, as was long suspected, limited to married couples of the higher social strata, but was practice in all levels of society.

The conference will examine the norms divorce-(un)willing spouses of the various denominations and religions were faced with from the end of the Middle Ages to the end of the 19th century. At the same time, we are interested in how these norms were negotiated in practice – before Protestant and Catholic consistories, before rabbinic or Sharia courts, and also before secular courts.

The broad range of possible links to the topic of the conference includes issues of (social) regulation in the access to marriage, transfer of goods during and after marriage, and issues of how married couples and divorced spouses made a living. Studies investigating the options for and the living conditions of divorced men and women are also welcome.

Keynote: Maria Ågren, Married Women’s Property and Work, Uppsala University

Please send your proposals for papers (approx. 1 page/300 words) together with a short academic CV by 28 February 2020 to:

Univ. Prof. Dr. Andrea Griesebner
andrea.griesebner[at]univie.ac.at
and
BA MA Isabella Planer
isabella.planer[at]univie.ac.at

We are pleased to be able to take care of the hotel and the food during the conference. We ask for your understanding that the travel expenses can be refunded only in exceptional cases.

More info here

15 July 2015

BOOK: "National Socialist Family Law The Influence of National Socialism on Marriage and Divorce Law in Germany and the Netherlands" by Mariken Lenaerts


Mariken Lenaerts, National Socialist Family Law The Influence of National Socialism on Marriage and Divorce Law in Germany and the Netherlands

In National Socialist Family Law, Mariken Lenaerts analyses the possible influence of National Socialism on marriage and divorce law in Germany and the Netherlands. As the family was regarded the germ-cell of the nation, the Nazis made many changes in German and Dutch marriage and divorce law to suit their purpose of a thousand-year Aryan Reich. By making extensive use of archival resources, Mariken Lenaerts gives an overview of the most important changes adopted in marriage and divorce law by the Nazis and proves that although daily marital life in both countries was highly influenced by National Socialism, marriage and divorce law did not become National Socialist.

  • Mariken Lenaerts, PhD (2012, Maastricht University), is a legal historian. She has taught a variety of courses at Maastricht University and has published previously about attempts to nazify Dutch family law during the German occupation ("De voorstellen tot herziening van het Nederlandse echtscheidingsrecht tijdens de Duitse bezetting" in Familie en Recht, December 2013)