(Source: OUP)
Oxford University Press has published a book on the
history of American presidential elections.
ABOUT THE BOOK
The Electoral College that governs America
has been with us since 1804, when Thomas Jefferson's supporters redesigned it
for his re-election. The Jeffersonians were motivated by the principle of
majority rule. Gone were the days when a president would be elected by
acclamation, as George Washington had been. Instead, given the emergence of
intense two-party competition, the Jeffersonians wanted to make sure that the
Electoral College awarded the presidency to the candidate of the majority,
rather than minority, party. They also envisioned that a candidate would win by
amassing a majority of Electoral College votes secured from states where the
candidate's party was in the majority.
For most of American history, this system has worked as intended, producing presidents who won Electoral College victories derived from state-based majorities. In the last quarter-century, however, there have been three significant aberrations from the Jeffersonian design: 1992, 2000, and 2016. In each of these years, the Electoral College victory depended on states where the winner received only a minority of votes.
For most of American history, this system has worked as intended, producing presidents who won Electoral College victories derived from state-based majorities. In the last quarter-century, however, there have been three significant aberrations from the Jeffersonian design: 1992, 2000, and 2016. In each of these years, the Electoral College victory depended on states where the winner received only a minority of votes.
In this authoritative history of the American Electoral College system, Edward Foley analyzes the consequences of the unparalleled departure from the Jeffersonians' original intent-and delineates what we can do about it. He explains how states, by simply changing their Electoral College procedures, could restore the original Jeffersonian commitment to majority rule. There are various ways to do this, all of which comply with the Constitution. If only a few states had done so before 2016, the outcome might have been different. Doing so before future elections can prevent another victory that, contrary to the original Jeffersonian intent, a majority of voters did not want.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Edward B.
Foley directs
the election law program at Ohio State University, where he also holds the
Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law. Previously, Foley clerked for Chief Judge
Patricia M. Wald of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and Justice
Harry Blackmun of the United States Supreme Court. He has also served as State
Solicitor in the office of Ohio's Attorney General, where he was responsible
for the state's appellate and constitutional litigation. He is the author of
the acclaimed book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in
the United States (Oxford University Press) and co-author of Election
Law and Litigation: The Judicial Regulation of Politics.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Preface
Introduction
Part One: The Rise of the Jeffersonian Electoral College
1: The Electoral College of 1787
2: The First Four Elections
3: The Electoral College of 1803
Part Two: The Demise of the Jeffersonian Electoral College
4: The Jeffersonian Electoral College in the 19th Century
5: The Jeffersonian Electoral College in the 20th Century
Part Three: The Potential Restoration of the Jeffersonian Electoral College
7: A Recommitment to Majority Rule
8: An Exploration of Alternatives
9: A Feasible Reform
Conclusion
Notes
Index
Introduction
Part One: The Rise of the Jeffersonian Electoral College
1: The Electoral College of 1787
2: The First Four Elections
3: The Electoral College of 1803
Part Two: The Demise of the Jeffersonian Electoral College
4: The Jeffersonian Electoral College in the 19th Century
5: The Jeffersonian Electoral College in the 20th Century
Part Three: The Potential Restoration of the Jeffersonian Electoral College
7: A Recommitment to Majority Rule
8: An Exploration of Alternatives
9: A Feasible Reform
Conclusion
Notes
Index
More info
here
No comments:
Post a Comment