Search

11 March 2020

BOOK: Michael GAGARIN, Democratic Law in Classical Athens (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2020). ISBN 978-1-4773-2037-2, $45.00





University of Texas Press has published a new book on law in classical Athens.

ABOUT THE BOOK

The democratic legal system created by the Athenians was completely controlled by ordinary citizens, with no judges, lawyers, or jurists involved. It placed great importance on the litigants’ rhetorical performances. Did this make it nothing more than a rhetorical contest judged by largely uneducated citizens that had nothing to do with law, a criticism that some, including Plato, have made?

Michael Gagarin argues to the contrary, contending that the Athenians both controlled litigants’ performances and incorporated many other unusual features into their legal system, including rules for interrogating slaves and swearing an oath. The Athenians, Gagarin shows, adhered to the law as they understood it, which was a set of principles more flexible than our current understanding allows. The Athenians also insisted that their legal system serve the ends of justice and benefit the city and its people. In this way, the law ultimately satisfied most Athenians and probably produced just results as often as modern legal systems do. Comprehensive and wide-ranging, Democratic Law in Classical Athens offers a new perspective for viewing a legal system that was democratic in a way only the Athenians could achieve.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Michael Gagarin is the James R. Dougherty, Jr. Centennial Professor of Classics Emeritus at the University of Texas at Austin. His books include, most recently, The Laws of Ancient Crete, c. 650–400 BCE (with Paula Perlman).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface
Introduction
Chapter 1. Democracy
Chapter 2. Performance
Chapter 3. Negotiation
Chapter 4. Rhetoric
Chapter 5. Rules and Relevance
Chapter 6. Justice
Chapter 7. Public Interest
Chapter 8. The Rule of Law
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index Locorum
General Index

More info here

BOOK: Mark SWATEK-EVENSTEIN, A History of Humanitarian Intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2020), 286 p. ISBN 9781107061927, 85 GBP

(image source: CUP)

Abstract:
The question of 'humanitarian intervention' has been a staple of international law for around 200 years, with a renewed interest in the history of the subject emerging in the last twenty years. This book provides a chronological account of the evolution of the discussion and uncovers the fictional narrative provided by international lawyers to support their conclusions on the subject, from justifications and arguments for 'humanitarian intervention', the misrepresentation of great power involvement in the Greek War of Independence in 1827, to the 'humanitarian intervention that never was', India's war with Pakistan in 1971. Relying on a variety of sources, some of them made available in English for the first time, the book provides an undogmatic, alternative history of the fight for the protection of human rights in international law.
On the author:
Mark Swatek-Evenstein is a scholar and lawyer specializing in criminal law, immigration and refugee law. He is a member of the International Network of Genocide Scholars and has taught courses on The Holocaust and The Law. His current research focuses on the minority experience in international law. 
(source: ESILHIL Blog)

BOOK: Kate BRADLEY, Lawyers for the Poor: Legal Advice, Voluntary Action and Citizenship in England, 1890–1990 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2019). ISBN 978-1-5261-3605-3, £80.00



Manchester University Press has published a new book on Legal advice, voluntary action and citizenship in England (1890–1990).

ABOUT THE BOOK

From the 1890s onwards, social reformers, volunteer lawyers, and politicians increasingly came to see access to affordable or free legal advice as a critical part of helping working-class people uphold their rights with landlords, employers, and retailers - and, from the 1940s, with the welfare state. Whilst a state scheme was launched in 1949, it was never fully implemented and help from a lawyer remained out of the reach of many people. Lawyers for the poor is the first full-length study of the development of voluntary action and mutual schemes to make the law more accessible, and the pressure put on the legal profession and governments to bring in further reforms. It offers new insights of the role of access to the law in shaping ideas about citizenship and civil rights in the twentieth century.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Kate Bradley is Senior Lecturer in Social History and Social Policy at the University of Kent

TABLE OF CONTENTS

List of abbreviations
Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction
1 Making free legal aid and advice the business of state and profession
2 The Poor Man's Lawyer
3 The political law
4 The trade unions and legal services
5 Technology, access and education
6 Advice services in the post-war welfare state
Conclusion
Select Bibliography
Index

More info here

10 March 2020

BOOK: Ian WARD, English Legal Histories (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020). ISBN: 9781509912315, pp. 492, £75.00

Media of English Legal Histories
(Source: Hart Publishing)



ABOUT THE BOOK

English Legal Histories is an exciting and innovative approach to the study of English law. Written in an accessible style intended for students as well as a broader audience, it takes the reader beyond the narrower confines of legal doctrines and cases, and invites them to consider the myriad contexts within which English law has been shaped: the politics, the economics, the art, the poetry. Reaching from the Reformation through to the age of Reform, it tells stories, the 'histories', of English law. Histories of the constitution and government, of crime and contracts, tort and trespass, property and equity. Of the people who made that law, those who wrote it, and those who suffered it. For it is in the end a human story, of justice and injustice, of success and failure, good luck and bad. The law is full of statutes and instruments, cases and precedent, but its history is full of people and peculiarity. Which is what, of course, makes it so endlessly fascinating.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ian Ward is Professor of Law at Newcastle University, and the author of a number of books on law, literature and history including 'Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives' (Cambridge University Press, 1995), 'Shakespeare and the Legal Imagination' (Cambridge University Press, 1999), The English Constitution: Myths and Realities' (Hart Publishing, 2004), 'Law, Text, Terror' (Cambridge University Press, 2009) and most recently 'Law and the Brontes' (Palgrave, 2011).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I - 1613
1. England in 1613
2. 1613: Constitutional Law
3. 1613: Criminal Law
4. 1613: Private Law
5. 1613: Property Law

Part II - 1765
6. England in 1765
7. 1765: Constitutional Law
8. 1765: Criminal Law
9. 1765: Private Law
10. 1765: Property Law

Part III - 1887
11. England in 1887
12. 1887: Constitutional Law
13. 1887: Criminal Law
14. 1887: Private Law
15. 1887: Property Law


More information here


BOOK: Jörg TELLKAMP, ed., A Companion to Early Modern Spanish Imperial, Political and Social Thought (Leiden-New York: Brill, 2020). ISBN 978-90-04-41279-8, €156.00


(Source: Brill)

Brill has published a companion to early modern Spanish imperial political and social thought.

ABOUT THE BOOK

This Companion aims to give an up-to-date overview of the historical context and the conceptual framework of Spanish imperial expansion during the early modern period, mostly during the 16th century. It intends to offer a nuanced and balanced account of the complexities of this historically controversial period analyzing first its historical underpinnings, then shedding light on the normative language behind imperial theorizing and finally discussing issues that arose with the experience of the conquest of American polities, such as colonialism, slavery or utopia. The aim of this volume is to uncover the structural and normative elements of the theological, legal and philosophical arguments about Spanish imperial ambitions in the early modern period. 

Contributors are Manuel Herrero Sánchez, José Luis Egío, Christiane Birr, Miguel Anxo Pena González, Tamar Herzog, Merio Scattola, Virpi Mäkinen, Wim Decock, Christian Schäfer, Francisco Castilla Urbano, Daniel Schwartz, Felipe Castañeda, José Luis Ramos Gorostiza, Luis Perdices de Blas, Beatriz Fernández Herrero.

ABOUT THE EDITOR

Jörg Alejandro Tellkamp (Ph.D. 1997; University Halle-Wittenberg) is Professor of Philosophy at the Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana in Mexico City. His current research focuses on the normative language of the School of Salamanca and its influence in 16th-century Mexico.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
By: Jörg Alejandro Tellkamp
Pages: 1–13
Historical Foundations
Spanish Theories of Empire: A Catholic and Polycentric Monarchy
By: Manuel Herrero Sánchez
Before Vitoria: Expansion into Heathen, Empty, or Disputed Lands in Late-Mediaeval Salamanca Writings and Early 16th-Century Juridical Treatises
By: José Luis Egío and Christiane Birr
The “School of Salamanca” and the American Project
By: Miguel Anxo Pena González
Pages: 78–101
Toggle Tree Node
Towards New Normative Orders
Colonial Law: Early Modern Normativity in Spanish America
By: Tamar Herzog
Natural Law and Natural Right in the Spanish Scholasticism
By: Merio Scattola ✝
Dominion Rights: Their Development and Meaning in the History of Human Rights
By: Virpi Mäkinen
Princes and Prices: Regulating the Grain Market in Scholastic Economic Thought
By: Wim Decock
Ethics and Politics of the Conquest and Colonization
Conquista and the Just War
By: Christian Schäfer
The Debate of Valladolid (1550–1551): Background, Discussions, and Results of the Debate between Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Bartolomé de las Casas
By: Francisco Castilla Urbano
Caramuel on the Right of Discovery
By: Daniel Schwartz
Spanish Colonialism as Perpetual Dominion in the Writings of Juan Solórzano Pereira
By: Felipe Castañeda
The Debate over the Enslavement of Indians and Africans in the Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Spanish Empire
By: Luis Perdices de Blas and José Luis Ramos Gorostiza
The “New World”: The Shaping of Utopia
By: Beatriz Fernández Herrero

More info here

09 March 2020

BOOK: Julien CHAISSE, Sixty Years of European Integration and Global Power Shifts Perceptions, Interactions and Lessons. (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020). ISBN 9781509933747, £82.62


(Source: Hart Publishing)

Hart Publishing is publishing a new book on the history of EU integration.

ABOUT THE BOOK

This book focuses on a review of how sixty years of case-law and regulatory activity transformed the European continent and the world. It provides a critical analysis of the key features of EU integration and how this integration is perceived (internally and externally). In this context, this book also explores the EU's interactions with a number of other countries and organisations with the objective of assessing the EU's role in global governance.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Julien Chaisse is Professor of Law at the City University of Hong Kong (CityU) and Advisory Board Member of the Asian Academy of International Law (AAIL).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. The European Union: Achievements, Ongoing Challenges
and Future Prospects
Julien Chaisse

PART I
EUROPEAN LEGAL INTEGRATION: PROCESS, DIFFICULTIES AND ACHIEVEMENTS
2. The Rule of Law and Integration in the EU
Ian Forrester QC
3. The European Union as an Oxymoron: From Contest via Contradiction to Constitution?
Rostam J Neuwirth
4. The Social Dimension of the EU
Manfred Weiss
5. Geographical Scope and Diversity of EU Rules on Public Procurement
Trygve Ben Holland
6. Spatial Configurations of Welfare in the EU: The Case of Cross-border Healthcare
Irene Sobrino Guijarro
7. Godot is Finally Coming? The Great Convergence of Services Markets within the EU
Panagiotis Delimatsis
8. Government, Culture and Movies: In Search of a Common Understanding from a European Perspective
Susana de la Sierra

PART II
THE EUROPEAN UNION AS A GLOBAL ACTOR: ISSUES AND PARTNERS
9. The European Union and Global Economic Governance: A Leader Without a Roadmap?
Jan Wouters and Akhil Raina
10. Lessons from European Constitutionalism for Reforming Multilevel Governance of Transnational Public Goods in Asia?
Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann
11. The EU's Civil Justice Policy Field: Perspectives for Asia?
Helen E Hartnell
12. Bilateralism in an Interregional World? From EU Negotiations with MERCOSUR to a Bilateral Strategic Partnership with Brazil
Katharina L Meissner
13. Reclaiming the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership through the EU–China Partnership and Cooperation Agreement: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
Chien-Huei Wu
14. Legalisation of International Economic Relations: Is Asia Unique?
Shintaro Hamanaka

PART III
EUROPEAN UNION'S TRADE POLICY: GLOBAL AND REGIONAL TRADE CHALLENGES
15. Trade for All? Transparency in the EU's Common Commercial Policy
Fernando Dias Simões
16. Investor to State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: A Comparison of Evolving Legal Approaches in Brazilian and Latin American Relations with the European Union
Daniele Bianchi and Kirstyn Inglis
17. The Rise of the RCEP: Regional Multilateralism and its Impact on the EU–China BIT
Olga Boltenko
18. The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership: Intellectual Property Chapter, Research in Biotechnology and Price of Medicine with Lessons from the European Union
Sufian Jusoh
19. Geographical Indications in the EU, China and Australia: WTO Case Bottling Up Over Prosecco
Danny Friedmann
20. Indian Pharma Sector's Journey for the Innovation Panacea: Lessons from Negotiations wiTheU and RCEP
Debashis Chakraborty and Nilanjan Banik

More info here

SEMINAR SERIES: 1920-2020. Un secolo di giustizia costituzionale - Università degli studi di Trieste, Dipartimento di Scienze giuridiche, del Linguaggio, dell'Interpretazione e della Traduzione

Foto

06 March 2020

BOOK: Mario CARAVALE, Magna Charta Libertatum (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2020). ISBN: 9788815286093, pp. 136, € 12.00



Cover Magna Charta Libertatum
(Source Il Mulino)

ABOUT THE BOOK

Questo libro analizza il contesto storico e giuridico in cui venne promulgata la Magna Carta del 1215, uno dei documenti più celebri del periodo medievale. Quest'ultima consolidava alcuni dei diritti consuetudinari degli ordinamenti vigenti nel regno inglese all’inizio del secolo XIII. Ancora oggi la Magna Carta è considerata come fonte di princìpi per gli ordinamenti giuridici. Inoltre essa continua a rappresentare un manifesto del valore universale delle libertà individuali.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mario Caravale è professore ordinario di Storia del diritto italiano nella Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell'Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, dopo avere insegnato nella Università di Camerino e, nella stessa sede romana, nella Facoltà di Scienze politiche. E’ direttore del Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani pubblicato dall'Istituto
dell'Enciclopedia Italiana.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduzione
Parte prima: Fondamenti ed evoluzione storica della Magna Carta
I. Gli ordinamenti giuridici del regno d’Inghilterra
II. L’autorità unitaria del re
III. Gli avvenimenti che portarono alla Magna Carta 1215
IV. La Magna Carta Libertatum 1215
V. Inghilterra e Sicilia a confronto
VI. Gli avvenimenti successivi all’accordo di Runnymede: le Cartae del 1216, del 1217 e la Carta de Foresta
VII. La Magna Carta 1225 e i suoi rinnovi
VIII. Il mito della Magna Carta
Parte seconda: Appendice documentale
«Articuli Baronum. Ista sunt Capitula quae Barones petunt et dominus Rex concedit»
Magna Carta Libertatum 1215
Carta de Foresta 1217
Magna Carta 1225
Confirmatio cartae 1297
Riferimenti bibliografici

More information here


BOOK: Daniel Arne WYSS, Wie viel Bluntschli steckt in Huber? Ein Vergleich der allgemeinen Grundsätze des Erbrechts bei Johann Caspar Bluntschli und Eugen Huber [Europäische Rechts- und Regionalgeschichte, Bd. 22] (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2018), 189 p. 978-3-8487-5382-6, € 58

(image source: Nomos)

Abstract:
Das von Johann Caspar Bluntschli (1808–1881) ausgearbeitete Privatrechtliche Gesetzbuch für den Kanton Zürich von 1854/56 sei die wichtigste Vorlage für das von Eugen Huber (1849–1923) entworfene Schweizerische Zivilgesetzbuch gewesen. Diese Ansicht ist bis heute weitverbreitet. Aber wie viel Bluntschli steckt wirklich in Huber? Diese Frage wird im vorliegenden Buch in Bezug auf das Erbrecht beantwortet, denn sowohl Bluntschli als auch Huber interessierten sich in besonderem Masse für das Erbrecht und dessen kaum zu unterschätzende Bedeutung für die Gesellschaft. Im Zentrum der Untersuchung stehen die grundsätzlichen Gestaltungsentscheidungen. Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass Bluntschli und Huber durchaus bestimmte Ansichten teilten. Sie belegt aber auch, dass die Unterschiede zwischen den Vorstellungen der beiden Juristen in den zentralen Punkten größer sind, als dies bisher angenommen wurde.
More information with Nomos.

BOOK: Nadine DRÖNNER, Das “Homosexuellen-Urteil” Des Bundesverfassungsgerichts Aus Rechtshistorischer Perspektive (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020). ISBN 978-3-16-157571-6, EUR 85.00


(Source: Mohr Siebeck)

Mohr Siebeck is publishing a book on the “homosexuality-decision” of the German Bundesverfassungsgericht in 1957.

ABOUT THE BOOK

Im heutzutage weitgehend negativ konnotierten 'Homosexuellen-Urteil' des Bundesverfassungsgerichts von 1957 lehnte es das Karlsruher Gericht ab, die damaligen massenhaften Bestrafungen von Männern wegen homosexueller Kontakte für verfassungswidrig zu erklären.

Ungeklärt war bislang, wie sich dieses Urteil mit der heute erheblich positiver beurteilten Grundrechtsjudikatur des Gerichts in den 1950er Jahren vereinbaren lässt. Nadine Drönner analysiert umfassend und quellengestützt die zeittypischen Ursachen und Motivationen des Urteils und seine Folgen für die Rechtsdogmatik. Das Urteil verstand sich dabei als Entscheidung für den Augenblick und gab damit – entgegen gewichtigen Stimmen in den Rechts- und Sozialwissenschaften – einem zukünftigen Wandel der Auffassungen zur Homosexualität eine verfassungsrechtliche Grundlage.
Damit ermöglicht die Autorin einen differenzierten Blick auf das Urteil: Es hat die massenhaften Strafverfahren gegen homosexuelle Männer nicht beendet, aber mit seiner Begründung und interdisziplinären Argumentation die spätere Entkriminalisierung mit vorbereitet.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Nadine Drönner Studium der Rechtswissenschaft an der J.W. Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main und der University of Sydney; Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Lehrstuhl für Neuere und neueste Rechtsgeschichte, Zivilrecht und Gewerblichen Rechtsschutz der Universität Frankfurt/Main; 2018 Promotion; Rechtsreferendariat am LG Frankfurt, Deutsche Botschaft Kuala Lumpur, Public Defender of the State of Hawai'i.

More info here

BOOK: Ermanno CALZOLAIO and Luigi LACCHÈ, eds., Justice and Unjusticiability: Perspectives and Issues between History and Comparison (Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2020). ISBN 978-3-643-91099-8, 34.90 EUR


(Source: Lit Verlag)

Lit Verlag has published a new book on unjusticiability and non-justiciability from a historical and comparative perspective.

ABOUT THE BOOK

The book tries to identify the main contours of unjusticiability and non-justiciability from an historical and comparative perspective distinguishing between common law world and civil law tradition. In the light of a general overview, the aim of this publication is to reflect on the utility of paving the way for a much wider approach to unjusticiability. More precisely, some scholars have recently suggested that such a notion could embrace all the situations where a court does not decide a case, so that it is impossible for the plaintiff to have the case decided by a court. A first category covers the situations where the court refuses to judge because it does not want to judge, A second category is related to all the cases where there is an impossibility to reach a decision. Anycase if the judge cannot or does not wish to make justice – si iudex non facit iustitiam –, continues today to indicate a series of new (and old) questions.

ABOUT THE EDITORS

Ermanno Calzolaio is Full Professor of Comparative Law at the University of Macerata.
Luigi Lacchè is Full Professor of Legal History at the University of Macerata and LUISS “G. Carli” in Rome.

More info here

VICTORIA KENT PRIZE

The Victoria Kent Prize of the University of Malaga for studies on women, gender or feminism was awarded to Maria Sol Calandria for her PhD thesis "Matar a la madre. Infanticidios, honor y género en la Provincia de Buenos Aires (1886-1921)".

Source: https://laplata.conicet.gov.ar/una-becaria-del-conicet-fue-galardonada-internacionalmente-por-una-tesis-sobre-genero-y-feminismo/?fbclid=IwAR3nD3AjQjCcQDcZAIFcCwFTfYRLXpCiOA0oYwRBrRmQOSSmQN4Hl6vscx4

05 March 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS: Crossing Borders, Contesting Boundaries. 14th Annual MEMSA Conference - Durham University, 20th - 21st July 2020


(Source: MEMSA)


We learned of a call for papers for a conference organised by the Student Association (MEMSA) of the Institute of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (IMEMS), Durham University. Here the call:

The finale of MEMSA's academic year is its own postgraduate conference in Durham which attracts a wide variety of postgraduates and academics from across the UK and beyond. Previous conference themes have included: Being Human (2008), Authority (2009), Time and Memory (2010), Recognizing Beauty (2011), and The Mutilated Body (2013). Each year, the conference has welcomed a wide variety of highly original and engaging postgraduate papers, and has enjoyed the privilege of hearing internationally regarded keynote speakers, including Prof. Helen Cooper, Dr John Watts, Prof. Miri Rubin, and Prof. Mary Carruthers, present their research. Journals from previous conferences can be found on the MEMSA WordPress site by clicking this link: https://durhammemsa.wordpress.com/memsa-conferences-and-conference-proceedings/

Please send abstracts of no more than 250 words for 20-minute papers to memsa.committee@durham.ac.uk

Deadline 27th March 2020
Borders and boundaries divided the medieval and early modern world, both its physical space and its more intangible social hierarchies and networks. Theologically, socially, domestically, and diplomatically, the medieval and early modern world sought to define its edges in order to confirm its centres. Borders and boundaries helped construct and reinforce identities, creating a sense of belonging, safety, and security; but they also partitioned, segregated, and restricted both individual and group behaviour and activity. Thus borders and boundaries, once set, invited debate, defence, and defiance.

We are delighted to announce our keynote speakers:

• Dr Emma Whipday: Newcastle University, Department of English Studies will explore how brother-sister relationships on the early modern stage transgressed the boundaries of prescribed sibling behaviour.
• Dr Anna Groundwater: National Museums Scotland will consider the complexity of the early modern Anglo-Scottish border as it was imagined, performed, mobilised, and crossed.

Held in the historic Durham World Heritage Site, this 14th annual MEMSA conference will explore the crossing of borders and contesting of boundaries in the broadest possible sense. We invite both literal and figurative readings of our theme. We welcome abstract submissions from postgraduate students and early career academics from any discipline engaged in the study of the Medieval and Early Modern periods.

Possible presentation themes may include:

• Travel, trade, and pilgrimage
• Cartography and exploration
• Frontier zones and border regions
• Rivalry, conflict, and diplomatic relations
• Social and domestic networks
• Gender norms and expectations
• Intellectual exchange
• Popular participation in politics
• Texts and paratext
• Gender norms and expectations
• Religious schism and reform
• Legal jurisdiction and transgression


More information here

BOOK: Frédéric AUDREN, Anne-Sophie CHAMBOST, and Jean-Louis HALPÉRIN, Histoires contemporaines du droit (Paris: Dalloz, 2020). ISBN 9782247192359, 42.00 EUR


(Source: Dalloz)

Dalloz has published a book on “Histoires contemporaines du droit”.

ABOUT THE BOOK

Histoires contemporaines du droit. Pourquoi ce pluriel ? Parce qu'il ne s'agit pas d'évolution chronologique, mais d'une réflexion critique sur la manière d'aborder la discipline, les différents aspects du droit, ses acteurs, ses lieux de production, etc.

Au lieu de raconter l'histoire depuis 1700 à nos jours, les auteurs envisagent une méthode pour substituer une histoire des controverses à une histoire se voulant neutre, pour substituer une histoire décloisonnée à une histoire purement disciplinaire, pour substituer une histoire globalisée à une histoire nationale.

A rebours de la spécialisation des savoirs juridiques qui polarise la plupart des approches de l’histoire du droit, ce manuel d’histoires contemporaines du droit propose par conséquent une histoire critique (autocritique, en ce qu’elle interroge la cohérence interne de la discipline), qui assume à la fois l’originalité chronologique (XIXe-XXe siècles) et la diversité des points de vue que ses auteurs proposent sur la discipline (avec une ouverture aux travaux étrangers ainsi qu’aux méthodes d’autres disciplines).

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Frédéric Audren : Ecole de droit de Sciences Po
Anne-Sophie Chambost : Professeur d'histoire du droit, CERCRID, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne
Jean-Louis Halpérin : Professeur à l'Ecole normale supérieure-Ulm, membre de l'Institut universitaire de France

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Partie 1 : Un champ disciplinaire, des modes d’existence
1. Une histoire nationale ?
2. Une histoire longue ?
3. Une histoire contemporaine ?
Partie 2 : Historiographie plurielle
1.Une histoire des normes juridiques
2. Une histoire des professionnels du droit
3. Une histoire de la dogmatique juridique
4. Une histoire des usages et des usagers du droit
5.
Une histoire politique du droit
Partie 3 : Permanence et discontinuité des activités juridiques
1. Juger
2. Légiférer
3. Administrer
4. Enseigner
Partie 4 :Le métier du juriste à l’épreuve de l’histoire
1. 
Le juriste en écrivain
2. Le juriste en expert
3. Le juriste en majesté
4. Le juriste en voyageur

More info here

BOOK: Tommaso BEGGIO and Aleksander GREBIENIOW, eds., Methodenfragen Der Romanistik Im Wandel - Paul Koschakers Vermächtnis 80 Jahre Nach Seiner Krisenschrift (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020).ISBN 978-3-16-159276-8, 59.00 EUR


(Source: Mohr Siebeck)

Mohr Siebeck is publishing “Methodenfragen der Romanistik im Wandel“. The book will be presented at the University of Trento (Sala Giustino d’Orazio, Facoltà di Giurisprudenza) on 2 April 2020, 15.00.

ABOUT THE BOOK

Das Buch gibt einen Überblick der zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts geführten Diskussion über die methodologischen Ansätze der Romanistik und berücksichtigt dabei insbesondere die von Paul Koschaker 1938 vorgeschlagene »Aktualisierung« des römischen Rechts. Die damaligen Kontroversen umfassten die Fragen, ob dem römischen Recht heutzutage immer noch eine, im Sinne der Rechtsdogmatik praktische Bedeutung zugesprochen werden kann, oder, ob es lediglich ein geschichtliches Erzeugnis und Kulturerbe Europas darstellt. Seit der »Krisenschrift« Koschakers wurde das zum Hauptdilemma der romanistischen Methodendiskussion. Auch heute, in Zeiten der Europakrise und angesichts neuer wissenschaftlicher Plädoyers, ist die Frage wieder besonders aktuell.

ABOUT THE EDITORS

Tommaso Beggio ist Ricercatore an der Universität Trient.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-2995

Aleksander Grebieniow ist Assistenz-Professor an der Universität Warschau und Mitglied des Forschungsbüros im Obersten Gericht der Republik Polen.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0380-4541

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Christian Baldus: Vorwort – Tommaso Beggio/Aleksander Grebieniow: Einleitung – Tommaso Beggio: Tra Rechtsdogmatik e vergleichende Rechtsgeschichte. Questioni di metodo e studio del diritto romano nell'opera di Paul Koschaker – Marko Petrak: Ius europaeum or ius oecumenicum? Koschaker, Schmitt and D'Ors on Roman Law and the Renewal of Legal Scholarship in the Postwar Context – Filippo Bonin: La romanistica italiana dinanzi alla crisi tedesca. La Aktualisierung degli studi di diritto romano e il patto Betti-Koschaker – Tomasz Giaro: Legal Historians and the Eastern Border of Europe – Aleksander Grebieniow: Römisches Recht als Vergleichsfaktor: Ignacy Koschembahr-Łyskowski (1864–1945) und die Methodenfrage – Philipp Bosch: Seminar- und Diskussionsbericht

More info here

04 March 2020

BOOK: Antonio MERLINO, Interpretazioni di Montesquieu (Foligno, Il Formichiere, 2018). ISBN: 8894805522, pp. 177, €18,00

(Source: Il Formichiere)


ABOUT THE BOOK

Quarto volume della collana "Piccola Biblioteca del Pensiero Giuridico", prefazione di Diego Quaglioni.

Era dalla complessiva revisione del giudizio su Montesquieu giurista, proposta da Giovanni Tarello in un lungo saggio del 1971 (Per una interpretazione sistematica di Montesquieu) poi rifuso nel suo fortunato e controverso volume su Assolutismo politico e codificazione del diritto (1976), che non si facevano più i conti con le interpretazioni di Montesquieu in una maniera così schietta e salutare. A quaranta anni e più dalla pubblicazione di quelle pagine, il bisogno di una visione d’insieme sui restauri del ritratto di Montesquieu si era fatto ancora più urgente. Antonio Merlino ha scelto la sola via possibile, che è sempre quella del ritorno alla genuinità dei testi e delle fonti, a cominciare dalle Lettres Persanes. Ne risulta un Montesquieu a più facce, lontanissimo dalla stereotipia in cui tanta letteratura (manualistica e no) lo ha fissato nella fisionomia pacificata di un “classico del costituzionalismo moderno” (dalla Prefazione di Diego Quaglioni).

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Antonio Merlino insegna nella facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Salisburgo (FB Öffentliches Recht). Si è laureato in Giurisprudenza a Trento con una tesi sul pensiero giuridico di Vittorio Frosini. Si è quindi addottorato con lode nell’Università «Suor Orsola Benincasa» di Napoli e nell’Università «Paris Lodron» di Salisburgo. Ha conseguito l’abilitazione scientifica nazionale come professore associato in Storia del diritto medievale e moderno.
È autore di diversi saggi e delle monografie Storia di Kelsen. La recezione della reine Rechtslehre in Italia (Napoli, Editoriale Scientifica, 2012) e Kelsen im Spiegel der italienischen Rechtslehre (Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang, 2013).


More information here

03 March 2020

CONFERENCE (REMINDER) : « Enseigner le droit hors des frontières nationales (XIXe-XXe siècles) » (Bordeaux, 13 March 2020)

(Source : HID)


Deuxième volet du cycle de journées d’études « Enseigner le droit hors des frontières nationales (XIXe-XXe siècles) », Florence Renucci, Silvia Falconieri, Catherine Fillon et Laetitia Guerlain (dir.)

DATE AND PLACE : 13 MARCH 2020, BORDEAUX 

PROGRAMME :

Matinée > 9h-12h L’enseignement juridique dans les écoles préparatoires de droit

Accueil des participants Propos introductifs

Laetitia Guerlain, université de Bordeaux
L’éphémère École de droit de l’Île Bourbon : velléités et échecs (1825-1837)
Jérémy Boutier, Université Aix-Marseille
Les objectifs de la formation juridique à l’École préparatoire à l’enseignement du droit de Fort-de-France : entre mythes et réussites (1883-1948)
Elodie Coutant, université de Bordeaux
Former les praticiens du droit dans l’Inde française : l’École de droit de Pondichéry (1838-1954)
Laetitia Guerlain, université de Bordeaux, Florence Renucci, CNRS/ IMAF

Après-midi > 14h-17h Adaptations et mutations de l’enseignement juridique hors de la métropole

14h-14h45 Survivre à la fin du régime capitulaire : la stratégie d’adaptation de l’École Française de Droit du Caire, Catherine Fillon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon III

14h45-15h30 L’enseignement du droit au Cambodge post-colonial et post- communiste : enjeux et usages d’un terrain de compétition internationale, Adélaïde Martin, Université Paris Nanterre

15h30-16h15 Droit français en contexte chinois, ou quatre juristes et leurs temps, Mingzhe Zhu, China University of Political Science and Law

MORE INFORMATION : https://hid.hypotheses.org/4542

BOOK: Sinclair W. BELL and Paul DU PLESSIS, eds., Roman Law before the Twelve Tables - An Interdisciplinary Approach (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020). ISBN 9781474443968, £85.00



Edinburgh University Press is publishing a new book on Roman law before the Twelve Tables.

ABOUT THE BOOK

Bringing together a team of international experts from different subject areas – including law, history, archaeology and anthropology – this book re-evaluates the traditional narratives surrounding the origins of Roman law before the enactment of the Twelve Tables. Much is now known about the archaic period, relevant evidence from later periods continues to emerge and new methodologies bring the promise of interpretive inroads. This book explores whether, in light of recent developments in these fields, the earliest history of Roman law should be reconsidered.

Drawing upon the critical axioms of contemporary sociological and anthropological theory, the contributors yield new insights and offer new perspectives on Rome’s early legal history. In doing so, they seek to revise our understanding of Roman legal history as well as to enrich our appreciation of its culture as a whole.

ABOUT THE EDITORS

Sinclair W. Bell is Professor of Art History at Northern Illinois University. His research interests include art and archaeology of the Etruscans, spectacles in the Roman imperial period and the visual representation of slaves and foreigners in Roman imperial art. Sinclair currently the Editor of the Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. He is co-editor of 12 books, including Companion to the Etruscans (Wiley, 2016) and Free at Last: The Impact of Freed Slaves on the Roman Empire (Bloomsbury, 2012).

Paul J. du Plessis is Professor of Roman Law at the University of Edinburgh. His research focuses predominantly on the multifaceted and complex set of relationships between law and society in a historical context. Paul is an experienced editor and author. He is co-editor of the following publications: The Making of the Ius Commune: From Casus to Regula (EUP, 2010), Beyond Dogmatics: Law and Society in the Roman World (EUP, 2007), Reassessing Legal Humanism and Its Claims (EUP, 2015) and The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society (OUP, 2016). He is also editor of New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World (EUP, 2013), Cicero's Law: Rethinking Roman Law of the Late Republic (EUP, 2016) and Borkowski's Textbook on Roman Law (OUP, 2015).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction: The Dawn of Roman Law
Paul J. du Plessis and Sinclair W. Bell
Part I: The Materiality of Roman Law: New Archaeological Discoveries
1. Roman Law in its Italic Context
James Clackson
2. Central Italian Elite Groups as Aristocratic Houses in the Ninth to Sixth Centuries B.C.E.
Matthew Naglak and Nicola Terrenato
3. Authority and Display in Sixth-Century Etruria: The Vicchio Stele
P. Gregory Warden and Adriano Maggiani
Part II: Constructing Early Roman Law: Sources and Methods
4. The Twelve Tables and the Leges regiae: A Problem of Validity
Carlos Amunátegui Perelló
5. The Leges regiae in Livy: Narratological and Stylistic Strategies
Marco Rocco
6. The Leges regiae through Tradition, Historicity and Invention: A Comparison of Historico-Literary and Jurisprudential Sources
Rossella Laurendi
7. The Laws of the Kings – A View from a Distance
Christopher Smith
8. Beyond the Pomerium: Expansion and Legislative Authority in Archaic Rome
Jeremy Armstrong
Part III: Roman Law in Historiography and Theory
9. Niebuhr and Bachofen: New Forms of Evidence on Roman History
Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi
10. Finding Melanesia in Ancient Rome: Mauss’s Anthropology of nexum
Alain Pottage
Index

More info here

BOOK: Armel LE DIVELLEC (dir.), La notion de constitution dans la doctrine constitutionnelle de la Troisième République (Paris : Editions Panthéon-Assas, 2020), 262 p. ISBN 9782376510222, € 27.

(image source: univ-droit)


Abstract:
Omniprésente dans les discours juridiques et politiques des démocraties libérales contemporaines, la notion de constitution, qui a même donné son nom à une discipline, le droit constitutionnel, est-elle vraiment bien appréhendée par la doctrine des juristes d'aujourd'hui ? Rien n'est moins sûr. Employée dans des sens passablement différents, parfois contradictoires, elle fait partie des notions faussement claires de la science juridique. Les incertitudes qui caractérisent l'emploi du mot constitution viennent de loin. Une étude approfondie des travaux de la doctrine constitutionnelle française classique, celle de la Troisième République (1870-1940), permet de mettre en lumière cet état de fait. Le présent ouvrage examine, en quatorze contributions, cette doctrine à travers ses principaux auteurs, connus et moins connus, pour tenter de discerner dans quelle mesure s'est élaborée la manière (ou plutôt les manières) dont les juristes français pensent, tant bien que mal, la constitution aujourd'hui.
(source: univ-droit)

CONFERENCE: Internationale Tagung: Kaufrecht in Mitteleuropa - Entstehungs- und Wirkungsgeschichte der Art. 337-359 ADHGB (26-27 March 2020, Regensburg)


(Source: Uni Regensburg)

We learned of a conference on “Kaufrecht in Mitteleuropa”, and the legal history of Art. 337-359 of the German General Commercial Code. Please find the banner of the conference, including the speakers, above and here

More info with the Universität Regensburg

02 March 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS : The 2021 British Legal History Conference (BLHC), in association with the Irish Legal History Society (Belfast, 7-10 July 2021) (DEADLINE: 30 August 2020)



We learned of the call for papers for the next British Legal History Conference, which will be hosted by Queen’s University Belfast in July 2021.

LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE

Abstracts are invited for the 2021 BRITISH LEGAL HISTORY CONFERENCE which is being run jointly with the IRISH LEGAL HISTORY SOCIETY and hosted by Queen’s University Belfast. 

2021 will be a significant year in the “Decade of Centenaries”[1] in Ireland, north and south, marking both the centenary of the opening in June 1921 of the Parliament of Northern Ireland, established under the Government of Ireland Act 1920, and the centenary of the signing of articles of agreement for the Anglo-Irish Treaty in December 1921, which led to the establishment of the Irish Free State.  Against this background, BLHC 2021 will take place in partnership with the ILHS in Belfast. 

While the conference theme – “Law and Constitutional Change” – has been chosen in the context outlined above, this is without any intention to restrict the scope of the conference papers to Anglo-Irish history.   The theme will be interpreted in all its historical breadth, examining from any historical perspective the relationship between law and law-making on the one hand and, on the other, the shaping of constitutional principles and the disruption or maintenance of constitutional balance.

Please note the following rules:

-          Abstracts must be for individual papers only, not for panels
-          Only one abstract to be submitted per person
-          Abstracts must be submitted as Microsoft Word documents using the online portal on the Call for Papers page of the conference website.  Please do not submit by email.
-          Abstracts must not exceed 500 words
-          The deadline for submission of abstracts is Friday 30 August 2020
-          Queries can be emailed to BLHC-2021-info@qub.ac.uk    
-          At the conference, individual oral presentations will last 15-20 minutes.

We hope to publish the programme on the conference website in October 2020.  Details of plenary speakers will also appear there in due course.

Proposals from postgraduate and early career researchers are welcome.

Further information about travel to Belfast, accommodation, and so on, will be added to the conference website during 2020-2021:  https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/BLH-Conference-2021/

This, the second joint BLHC - ILHS conference, was proposed by Sir Anthony Hart, retired High Court judge, former president of ILHS and enthusiastic supporter of BLHCs, who died suddenly in July 2019.  A poster competition is planned during the 2021 conference as a tribute to Tony.  There will be two prizes, including one for the PGR/early career category. The prizes are generously funded by the Journal of Legal History and by the Irish Legal History Society.  Details of the competition will be posted on the conference website.


[1] See https://www.decadeofcentenaries.com, a website sponsored by the Irish Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, and other websites linked to it.

BOOK: Yaacov LEV, The Administration of Justice in Medieval Egypt From the 7th to the 12th Century (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020). ISBN 9781474459235, $125.00


(Source: OUP)

Edinburgh University Press is publishing a new book on judicial institutions in medieval Egypt.

ABOUT THE BOOK

This book shows how political and administrative forces shaped the way justice was applied in medieval Egypt. It introduces the model that evolved during the 7th to the 9th centuries, which involved four judicial institutions: the cadi, the court of complaint (mazalim), the police/shurta (responsible for criminal justice) and the Islamized market law (hisba) administrated by the market supervisor/muhtasib.

Literary and non-literary sources are used to highlight how these institutions worked in real-time situations such as the famine of 1024-1025, which posed tremendous challenges to the market supervisors in Cairo. The inner workings of the court of complaint during the 11th-12th century Fatimid state are revealed through array of documentary sources. Further, non-Muslim communities, their courts and their sphere of responsibilities are treated as integral to how justice was dispensed in medieval Islam. Documentary sources offers significant insights into these issues and illuminate the scope and limits of non-Muslims self-rule/judicial autonomy.              

In sum, the book shows that the administrative and political history of the judiciary in medieval Egypt implicitly and explicitly illuminates broader questions about religious and social forces that shaped the lives of medieval people in the Middle East, Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Yaacov Lev is Professor (Emeritus) in Middle Eastern Studies at Bar Ilan University, Israel. He is author of several books including Saladin in Egypt (Brill, 1998), Charity, Endowments, and Charitable Institutions in Medieval Islam (University Press of Florida, 2006) and Towns and Material Culture in the Medieval Middle East (Brill, 2013). His most recent publications include articles in JSAI and Medieval Encounters, and a chapter in Developing Perspectives in Mamluk History, edited by Yuval Ben-Bassat (Brill, 2017).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments

Introduction

Part One. The Cadi: Judge and Administrator

Chapter One. The Cadi's Jurisdiction: Evolution and Consolidation

Chapter Two. Sunn' Rulers and Their Cadis

Chapter Three. Ismaili Rulers and the Judicial System

Part Two. Judicial Institutions outside the Pale of Islamic Law

Chapter Four. Criminal Justice and the Police

Chapter Five. The Law of the Market

Chapter Six. The Ruler's Justice: The Mazalim Institution

Part Three. The Administration of Justice in Non-Muslim Communities

Chapter Seven. Judicial Autonomy: Medieval Realities and Modern Discourse

Chapter Eight. Administration of Justice in a Broader Perspective

More info here

CALL FOR PAPERS/ CONFERENCE : Actualité(s) de l'histoire du droit (Société d'Histoire du Droit, Paris 28-29 May 2020)

(Source : SHD)
The journées internationales of the Société d'Histoire du Droit will be held on 28-29 May 2020 in Paris.

CALL FOR PAPERS : proposals should be submitted at : contact@societehistoiredudroit.com  or http://www.societehistoiredudroit.com/inscription.php ; DEADLINE is on 11 April.

DESCRIPTION :

À l’invitation conjointe de l’université Panthéon-Assas (Paris 2) et de l’université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), et des centres de recherche qui leur sont rattachés (Institut d’histoire du droit UMR 7184, Paris 2 ; Institut de Recherche Juridique de la Sorbonne André Tunc, Paris 1), les prochaines Journées de la Société d’histoire du droit se tiendron.

Le projet scientifique de ces Journées rompt à première vue avec le format habituel des colloques annuels de la S.H.D., mais il renoue en réalité avec l’esprit des fondateurs ouvert aux extraordinaires découvertes de la science historiques du début du XXe s. et au perpétuel renouvellement des méthodes scientifiques. Plutôt que de choisir un thème précis, comme cela se fait depuis une trentaine d’années, nous avons voulu renouer avec cette tradition première de notre Société, dont les Journées furent longtemps « généralistes ».
À l’instar de nos collègues et amis de l’Association des Historiens des Facultés de Droit, qui avaient réalisé un bilan de la recherche et un état des lieux des questionnements nouveaux en histoire du droit (J. Krynen et B. d’Alteroche éd., L’histoire du droit en France. Nouvelles tendances, nouveaux territoires, Paris, 2014), nous souhaitons mettre nos pas dans les leurs et prendre notre discipline comme objet d’étude et sujet de prospective.
À défaut de thème, le titre de notre réunion parisienne pourrait être :

Actualité(s) de l’histoire du droit.

MORE INFORMATION AND REGISTRATION :  http://www.societehistoiredudroit.com/inscription.php

28 February 2020

BOOK: Wendell R. BIRD, The Revolution in Freedoms of Press and Speech From Blackstone to the First Amendment and Fox’s Libel Act (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020). ISBN 9780197509197, $99.00


(Source: OUP)

Oxford University Press is publishing a new book on the history of freedoms of press and speech in England and the United States in the 18th century.

ABOUT THE BOOK

This book discusses the revolutionary broadening of concepts of freedom of press and freedom of speech in Great Britain and in America in the late eighteenth century, in the period that produced state declarations of rights and then the First Amendment and Fox's Libel Act.

The conventional view of the history of freedoms of press and speech is that the common law since antiquity defined those freedoms narrowly, and that Sir William Blackstone in 1769, and Lord Chief Justice Mansfield in 1770, faithfully summarized the common law in giving a very narrow definition of those freedoms as mere liberty from prior restraint and not liberty from punishment after something was printed or spoken.       

This book proposes, to the contrary, that Blackstone carefully selected the narrowest definition that had been suggested in popular essays in the prior seventy years, in order to oppose the growing claims for much broader protections of press and speech. Blackstone misdescribed his summary as an accepted common law definition, which in fact did not exist. A year later, Mansfield inserted a similar definition into the common law for the first time, also misdescribing it as a long-accepted definition, and soon misdescribed the unique rules for prosecuting sedition as having an equally ancient pedigree. Blackstone and Mansfield were not declaring the law as it had long been, but were leading a counter-revolution about the breadth of freedoms of press and speech, and cloaking it as a summary of a narrow common law doctrine that in fact was nonexistent.      

That conflict of revolutionary view and counter-revolutionary view continues today. For over a century, a neo-Blackstonian view has been dominant, or at least very influential, among historians. Contrary to those narrow claims, this book concludes that the broad understanding of freedoms of press and speech was the dominant context of the First Amendment and of Fox's Libel Act, and that it enjoyed greater historical support.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Wendell Bird is the author of Press and Speech under Assault: The Early Supreme Court Justices, the Sedition Act of 1798, and the Campaign against Dissent (2016); and of Criminal Dissent: Prosecutions under the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 (2020). He earned a D.Phil. degree in legal history from University of Oxford, and a J.D. degree from Yale Law School. He is a Visiting Scholar at Emory University School of Law.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Illustrations
List of Abbreviations

Introduction

Part I The Devising of Narrow Liberties of Press and Speech

Chapter 1: Blackstone's and Mansfield's Narrow Liberties of Press and Speech, and Broad Crimes of Seditious Libel and Seditious Words: Summaries or Misdescriptions of an Ancient Common Law?

Chapter 2: The Crimes of Seditious Libel and Seditious Speech: Weapons for Suppressing Dissent in Britain and America?

Part II The British Broadening of Liberties of Press and Speech

Chapter 3: The Emerging Broad British View of Freedoms of Press and Speech, Before the Colonial Crisis

Chapter 4: The Prevailing British View of Freedoms of Press and Speech, in the Decade Before the American Revolution and Declarations of Rights

Chapter 5: The Dominant British View of Freedoms of Press and Speech, in the Decade Before Fox's Libel Act and America's Bill of Rights

Part III The American Development of Broad Rights of Press and Speech

Chapter 6: The Emergence of Expansive American Views of Freedoms of Press and Speech, Before the Colonial Crisis

Chapter 7: Reasons for the Spread of Broad Views of Liberties of Press and Speech in America, During and After the Colonial Crisis

Chapter 8: The Prevailing Broad View by the Popular Party of Freedoms of Press and Speech, in the Prerevolutionary Decade Before the American States' Declarations of Rights

Chapter 9: The Dominant American View of Freedoms of Press and Speech, in the Decade Leading up to Ratification of the Federal Bill of Rights

Chapter 10: The Constitutional Understanding of Freedoms of Press and Speech, and of Seditious Libel, in Discussions of State and Federal Bills of Rights

Epilogue

More info here