Search

Showing posts with label Roman Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roman Law. Show all posts

07 July 2026

BOOKS: Violet SOEN, Wouter DRUWÉ, Wim FRANCOIS & Ralph DECONINCK (eds.), Innovationes Lovanienses: Arts, Law and Theology at the University of Louvain (1425–1797) and Students, Scholars and Their Books at the University of Louvain (1425–1797) [Lectio, ed. Pieter D'HOINE/Studium Lovaniense, ed. Violet SOEN] (Turnhout: Brepols, 2026) [OPEN ACCESS]

 

(image source: Brepols)

Two open access volumes on the University of Leuven/Louvain in the late Middle Ages and Early Modern Age have been published recently.

Innovationes Lovanienses: Arts, Law and Theology at the University of Louvain (1425–1797) (eds. Violet Soen, Wouter Druwé, Wim François & Ralph Deconinck)
DOI 10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.145524
Abstract:

Throughout the first centuries of its existence, the University of Louvain functioned as a crossroads for the transmission of texts, ideas, and even images from Antiquity, across the Middle Ages, and through the Renaissance. From its foundational bulls between 1425 and 1432, the university was established as a prototypical studium generale, drawing inspiration from earlier institutions in Paris and Cologne and adopting elements from contemporary universities like Rostock and Geneva. Situated at the heart of Europe, the University of Louvain quickly became a pivotal center for the reception and dissemination of both ancient and contemporary knowledge across the continent, and later, the Habsburg Empire. This volume examines how teachers and students examined old and innovative ideas across various constituent bodies of the university, including the Faculty of Arts or the College of the Three Tongues, or neighboring institutions, like the Jesuit College. Contributions span the Faculties of Law, adopting insights on the newly promulgated Tridentine decrees or novel moral economies, to the Faculty of Theology, a hotbed of the controversies surrounding grace, free will, and salvation in post-Tridentine Catholicism. Of the many scholars that were active in Louvain, special attention is devoted to the philologist Petrus Nannius, the theologians Michael Baius and Jacobus Janssonius, the lawyers Petrus Peckius and Johannes Wamesius, and the Jesuits Robertus Bellarminus and Leonardus Lessius, along with the lectures they gave at the Louvain house of their Order.

Chapters

  • Innovationes Lovanienses. What Is New about the ‘Old’ University of Louvain (1425–1797)? (Violet Soen)
  • The Old and the New. Scholastic Elements in the Works of Petrus Nannius (1496–1557), Professor of the Collegium Trilingue in the First Half of the Sixteenth Century (Aline Smeesters)
  • Diagrammatic Innovations in Louvain Logic Notebooks (Seventeenth-Eighteenth Centuries) (Lorenz Demey)
  • The Role of Legal Practice in Louvain’s Legal Education (c. 1550–1650) (Wouter Druwé)
  • What Makes a Legal Commentary? . Louvain Professors on Liber Extra and Liber Sextus (Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries) (Piotr Alexandrowicz)
  • Teaching Canon Law after Trent. Mapping Juridical Sources in the Lectures of Petrus Peckius (1529–1589) (Ana Luiza Ferreira Gomes Silva)
  • When the Sun Stopped Setting. Louvain Lawyers & Theologians on Issues of Monopolies and Competition (1500–1670) (Wout Vandermeulen)
  • Knowledge of Nature and Scripture at the Threshold of Modernity. Michael Baius’s (1513–1589) Louvain Lecture on Romans 1 (Jarrik Van Der Biest)
  • The Internal Act of Faith in the Commentaries on the Summa theologiae. Produced in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-century Louvain (with a Comparison with Previous Iberian Commentators) (Lidia Lanza)
  • The Jesuit College and Knowledge Transmission: Robert Bellarmine’s Lectiones Louanienses (1570–1576) and the Spanish Scholastic Legal-Economic Thought (Shiri Roelofs)
  • Ex nudo Dei beneplacito. On Concord and Discord between Luis de Molina’s Concordia (1588) and Leonardus Lessius’s De gratia efficaci (1610) (C.J. (Niels) De Bruijn)
  • Vision, Love, and Joy. The Louvain Jesuit Leonard Lessius (1554–1623) on Beatitude (Patrícia Calvário)

Students, Scholars and Their Books at the University of Louvain (1425–1797) (eds. Violet Soen, Wouter Druwé, Wim François & Ralph Deconinck)
DOI 10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.145522
Abstract:

Integrating prosopographical, cartographical, and book-historical data, this collective volume on the first University of Louvain (1425–1797) contributes to ongoing interdisciplinary inquiries into the intellectual productions of students, scholars, and printers in the Early Modern era. The ten contributions examine the state of the art at the University of Louvain, whose output was supported by the vibrant printing presses of the Low Countries and the continual mobility of its scholars across continental Europe. The essays first unravel the transregional circuits of Louvain’s students, scholars, and printers, built upon their geographical mobility throughout Europe. The second part explores how early modern students at Louvain created their study materials by compiling lecture notes, rearranging the contents, and binding them into codices, often adorned with drawings or printed engravings – a practice that remained prevalent until the eighteenth century. Further contributions trace the introduction of the handpress to the city of Louvain, which, beginning in 1473, brought new opportunities for producing textbooks for broader markets, as typography and physical features transformed handbook production. Louvain’s publication network was especially dense in the sixteenth century, and publication rates remained high through the eighteenth century. This volume offers new insights into the hybrid world of oral teaching, handwritten note-taking, and printed textbook production by students, scholars, and printers at one of Europe’s intellectual crossroads.

Chapters

  • From Magister Dixit to STUDIUM.AI. New Perspectives on Students, Scholars and Their Books at the University of Louvain (1425–1797) (Violet Soen)
  • Louvain Scholars on the Move. Networks and Mobility Patterns at the Early University of Louvain. An Analysis of Academic Mobility (1425–1797) (David de la Croix & Maria Vitale)
  • From Transregional Recruitment to Self-reproduction. Building a Teaching Staff at the University of Louvain in Its First Two Decades (1425–1443) (Christiaan Engberts)
  • Who’s Who in STUDIUM.AI. New Linked Data about Students, Scholars and Printers at the Early Modern University of Louvain (1425–1797) (Violet Soen Yann Ryan)
  • The Louvain Lecture Halls during Theological Controversy. The Benedictine Student Stephanus Puelincx and His Notes on the Lectures of Jacobus Janssonius (c. 1607) (Linde Van den Eede)
  • In the University Classroom. Seventeenth-century Notebooks of Arts Students at the Universities of Louvain and Leiden (1651–1700) (An Smets)
  • Drawing Practices as Learning and Recreational Processes in Louvain Student Notebooks (Seventeenth–Eighteenth Centuries) (Gwendoline de Mûelenaere)
  • Honesti et probi adolescentes. Pardon Letters and Student Violence at the Early Modern University of Louvain (Sixteenth–Seventeenth Centuries) (Gert Gielis, Luke Giraudet & Quintin Verreycken)
  • The Importance of Typography in Knowledge Transfer. The Materiality of Louvain Printed Philosophy Textbooks (1474–1562) (Dieter Cammaerts)
  • Shedding (More) Light on Sixteenth-century Mapping Practices. Pieter Pourbus’s Application of Gemma Frisius’s Triangulation Methods (Jan Trachet & Hendrik Hameeuw)
  • Integrating Library and Prosopographical Data in the Early Modern Publication Network of the University of Louvain (1501–1797) (Rossana Scebba & Margherita Fantoli)
Both books can be read in open access with Brepols

 

01 June 2026

SEMINAR: “Le rite réalise le droit“? – Rituals and the Law in the Ancient World (Marburg: Universität Marburg, 12–13 JUN 2026)

(image source: Universität Marburg)

“Le rite réalise le droit“? – Rituals and the Law in the Ancient World

Marburg University&Marburg Center for the Ancient World (MCAW)

In person participation: Marburg University, Room 00A26, Deutschhausstraße 12, 35032 Marburg

12–13 June 2026 (Friday–Saturday)

Program:

Friday, 12 June 2026
14:00. Introduction: Nils Heeßel (Marburg) and Constantin Willems (Marburg)

14:30. The Legal Value of Contractual Rites in Mesopotamia: Sophie Démare Lafont (Paris)

16:00. The Performative Nature of Sealing Clay Tablets: Steffen Jauß (Frankfurt)

17:00. In Search of the Lost Ritual. Ritual(s) and the implementation of Assyrian adê: Lionel Marti (Paris)

Saturday, 13 June 2026
09:00. The Role of Ritual in the Roman Legal Process: Grzegorz Blicharz (Cracow)

10:30. Formal Contracts in Roman Law and in the New Belgian Civil Code: Jean-François Gerkens (Liège)

11:30. Final Discussion, Conclusions: Nils Heeßel (Marburg) and Constantin Willems (Marburg)

The full Program is available in PDF format here: ProgramMCAW.

26 May 2026

SEMINAR: Diritto Romano e mestiere del giurista. Esperienze, confronti, prospettive [Associazione Italiana di Diritto Romano] (Università degli Studi di Milano, 4–5 JUN 2026)

Diritto Romano e mestiere del giurista. Esperienze, confronti, prospettive

Associazione Italiana di Diritto Romano
Convegno: in presenza

Luogo: Aula 431, Università degli Studi di Milano — Via Festa del Perdono 3, Milano
4–5 giugno 2026

Contatti: Segreteria organizzativa (aidrmilano2026@unimi.it)

Per il programma completo del convegno (PDF): UniMil


Programma:


Giovedì 4 giugno 2026


Ore 14.30
Saluti istituzionali

Stefano Simonetta — Prorettore
Giuseppe Ondei — Presidente Corte d’Appello di Milano
Angela Santangelo — Direttore Dipartimento di diritto privato e storia del diritto
Carla Masi Doria — Presidente AIDR


Prima sessione. Il diritto come scienza per l’uomo. Omne ius hominum causa constitutum
Presiede Chiara Tenella Sillani

Francesco Fasolino — Ordinario di Diritto romano, Università degli Studi di Salerno
Alberto Venturelli — Ordinario di Diritto civile, Università degli Studi di Brescia


Discussione


Ore 17.00
Seconda sessione. Diritto romano e teoria generale del diritto
Presiede Claudio Luzzati

Luigi Garofalo — Ordinario di Diritto romano, Università degli Studi di Padova
Carlo Nitsch — Ordinario di Filosofia del diritto, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II


Discussione


Cena sociale


Venerdì 5 giugno 2026


Ore 9.30
Terza sessione. Il metodo esegetico al vaglio della contemporaneità
Presiede Sandro Schipani

Pietro Sirena — Ordinario di Diritto civile, Università Commerciale “Luigi Bocconi”


Discussione


Ore 11.00
Tavola rotonda
Presiede Patrizia Giunti

Giovanni Canzio — Già primo Presidente di Cassazione
Francesco Della Rocca — Notaio, Consigliere e Coordinatore delle Commissioni scientifiche del CNN
Antonio Genovese — Già Presidente di Sezione di Cassazione
C. Orisel Hernández Aguilar — “Titular” di Diritto romano, Università di Pinar del Río (Cuba)
Thomas Rüfner — Ordinario di Diritto romano e Diritto civile, Università di Treviri (Germania); Giudice presso la Corte d’Appello di Coblenza
Aldo Schiavone — Emerito di Diritto romano, Scuola Normale Superiore


Discussione


Ore 14.30
Assemblea dei soci
Elezione dei rappresentanti nel Direttivo

21 May 2026

BOOK: Vid ŽEPIĆ, Favor debitoris. Varstvo dolžnika v rimskem pravu (Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Pravna fakulteta & Litteralis d.o.o., 2026), 496 p., ISBN 978-961-7162-25-7, € 79.90

(image source: Knjigarna Pravna)

Abstract: 

Monografija obravnava razvoj načela favor debitoris oziroma krepitev varstva dolžnika v poznoantičnem rimskem pravu. Na podlagi analize cesarskih konstitucij od 4. do 6. stoletja prikazuje, kako so družbene, gospodarske in politične spremembe vplivale na zakonodajne ukrepe za zaščito dolžnika kot šibkejše stranke obligacijskega razmerja.

Posebna pozornost je namenjena razlagi pogodb, omejevanju pogodbene avtonomije, prenehanju obveznosti ter izvršbi in zavarovanju terjatev. Raziskava obenem osvetljuje vpliv gospodarske krize, provincialne pravne prakse, stoiške filozofije in vzhodnorimskih pravnih šol na razvoj poznega rimskega prava ter pokaže, kako so ti procesi vplivali tudi na kasnejši razvoj socialnih korektivov v civilnem pravu.

On the author:

Dr. Vid Žepič je docent na Katedri za pravno zgodovino Pravne fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani.

Table of contents:

Uvod
     1.1 Razvojne težnje in dejavniki rimskega obligacijskega prava
     1.2 Metodologija
     1.3 Stanje raziskav

(2) Razvojni dejavniki postklasičnega prava
     2.1 Cesarske konstitucije – ius novum
     2.2 Razvojni dejavniki

(3) Favor debitoris in njegove pojavne oblike
     3.1 Favor debitoris – pojmovna analiza
     3.2 Razlaga pravnih poslov
     3.3 Omejevanje pogodbene avtonomije
     3.4 Prenehanje obveznosti
     3.5 Zavarovanje in izvršba

(4) Sklep
     4.1 Favor debitoris v rimskem pravnem izročilu
     4.2 Razvojni dejavniki načela favor debitoris
     4.3 Pot do materializacije civilnega prava

(5) Zusammenfassung

Find more on Pravna fakulteta Univeza v Ljubljani & Knjigarna pravna.

15 May 2026

ADVANCE ARTICLE: Benjamin STRAUMANN, "From Individual virtue to the just state: Cicero and the legal nature of Roman political thought" (The Journal of Roman Studies) [OPEN ACCESS]

 

(image source: CUP)

Abstract:

Scholarship on Roman political thought and its legacy, especially anglophone, has rapidly expanded over the last decade. The main drivers of this renewed attention to Roman political ideas and institutions are an historical interest in the collapse of the Roman republic; a philosophical interest in republicanism; and a growing sensitivity to the originality of Roman thinkers, especially Cicero, in contrast to the older view that they were simply derivative of the Greeks. In this essay I will discuss recent publications on Cicero and Roman political ideas. After offering an overview of key themes in this new scholarship, I seek to suggest promising directions for future research and encourage the growing interest in Roman political thought and Cicero in particular. Cicero provides a fascinating link between ideas, institutions and action on the ground and he is therefore with good reason at the centre of much of the rapidly expanding literature on Roman political thought. In addition, given his interest in developing a theory of justice as the foundation of the state (res publica), a focus on Cicero will help explore the legacy of republicanism from the angle of his ideas about justice while paying attention to scholarship placing these ideas into their historical and institutional context.

Read more here: DOI  10.1017/S0075435825100634.

30 April 2026

SEMINAR: Disabilities and Women in Ancient Rome: Legal, social and cultural perspectives (Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 4 MAY 2026) [HYBRID]

 

(image source: UH)

Disabilities and Women in Ancient Rome: Legal, social and cultural perspectives 
 University of Helsinki

Workshop: In-person&Online

In person participation: University of Helsinki, Main Building (Unioninkatu 34), Room U3039 (3rd floor)

Registration through this form

Remote participation: via Zoom (https://helsinki.zoom.us/j/69089076203)

 Monday, 4 May 2026, from 10:00 to 17:30 EEST


Program:

10:0011:15 keynote: Prof. Christian Laes: Women and disabilities in Antiquity: between presentism and daily life 

11:3013:00 session 1: Disabled Women in the Roman Narratives 

Sofia Vierula: The case of Harpaste: Lived experience of disability in Seneca’s letter to Lucilius 

Mathilde Chartrand: The Daily Life of a Furiosa: On the Gendered Consequences of Mental Illness

Fran Geldard: Enslavement and Disability in Eusebian Martyr Narrative

[Lunch] 

14:0015:30 session 2: Women, Disability and Roman Law

Arnaud Paturet: Some Reflections on the Status of Deaf People by Roman Jurists 

Kaius Tuori: Infirmity and monstrosity: on the legal construction of female disability in law

Jana Mauri Marlborough: Against All Odds: The Legal Position of Wet Nurses in Roman Law

[Coffee]

16:0017:30 session 3: Intersections of Gender and Disability in Late Antiquity 

Gaetana Balestra: Muta puella fuit: The Mute Woman between tutela mulierum and Justinian's Legislation.

Elena Pezzato Heck: Mental Illness as Grounds for Repudiation in Late Antiquity and the Justinian Era

Arttu Alaranta: Vulnerable Life-Cycle Moments and Disabilities in Women’s Asceticism during Late Antiquity 

More information is available on UH website. 


 

04 February 2026

ENCYCLOPEDIA: Sylvie CROGIEZ-PETREQUIN "Le Code Théodosien (438-439) : un jalon du droit romain" (EHNE) [OPEN ACCESS]


 (image source: EHNE)

Introduction:

Le Code Théodosien est un recueil de règlements et de décisions impériales des ive et ve siècles, écrit en latin, et compilé à partir de 429. Les textes rassemblés ne sont pas des lois au sens moderne du terme : il s’agit d’un ensemble de décisions à propos de questions qui intéressent directement l’État romain impérial, comme les impôts ou l’administration de l’Empire. S’il est impossible d’en résumer le contenu, tant celui-ci touche à des sujets divers, il permet néanmoins d’approcher la société romaine de son époque.

Read the full entry here

23 January 2026

NEWS: Wim DECOCK appointed as new Regius Professor of Civil Law (Oxford University)

 

(image source: Oxford University)

Start of the press release:

His Majesty The King has approved the appointment of Professor Wim Decock, of the Universities of Louvain and Liège, as the new Regius Professor of Civil Law at the University of Oxford. He will take up the post on 1 October 2026 and succeeds Professor Wolfgang Ernst.

 Read the full press release here.

BOOK: Dirk ERDELKAMP, Nemo pro parte testatus pro parte intestatus decedere potest [Schriten zur Europäischen Rechts- und Verfassungsgeschichte; 64] (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2025), 321 p., ISBN 978-3-428-19350-9

 Cover: Nemo pro parte testatus pro parte intestatus decedere potest

ABOUT THE BOOK:

Die Arbeit setzt sich als erste deutschsprachige Monographie seit dem Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts mit dem »[großen] Rätsel des römischen Erbrechts« (Lenel), dem sog. Nemo-pro-parte-Prinzip, auseinander, das eine Kombination von testamentarischer und Intestaterbfolge verbot. Geltungsanspruch und Anwendung des Prinzips werden von dessen römisch-rechtlichen Anfängen über seine gemeinrechtliche Rezeption bis in die Neuzeit hinein verfolgt. Inhaltliche Schwerpunkte liegen dabei zum einen auf der Rezeptionsgeschichte des Prinzips in den verschiedenen Entwicklungsstufen des gemeinen Rechts sowie auf der bislang umfangreichsten Sammlung von Theorien, die im Laufe der Zeit zu seiner Erklärung entwickelt worden sind. Die Arbeit schließt mit dem Vergleich zwischen einer Anwendung des Nemo-pro-parte-Prinzips und der Regeln des heutigen deutschen Erbrechts. Hierbei erweist es sich, dass der Vorwurf der Interessenwidrigkeit, der häufig gegen das Prinzip erhoben wird, nicht ohne weiteres haltbar ist.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
 
1. Grundzüge des römischen Erbrechts
Die römische familia – Stellung des Erben und Intestaterbfolge – Testamentarische Erbfolge – Das Anwachsungsprinzip – Das ius praetorium – Nachklassische Entwicklungen

2. Das Nemo-pro-parte-Prinzip im römischen Recht
Ursprünge des Prinzips – Quellen – Anwendungsbereich

3. Die Rezeption des Nemo-pro-parte-Prinzips
Ius commune – Jüngere Kodifikationen

4. Begründungsansätze für das Nemo-pro-parte-Prinzip
Einleitende Bemerkungen – Die Begründungsansätze im Überblick

5. Das Nemo-pro-parte-Prinzip im Lichte des BGB
Die Systematik der §§ 2088, 2089, 2094 BGB – Grundlagen der Testamentsauslegung – Fallgruppen im Vergleich
 
Find more here

01 December 2025

INTERVIEW: François WAQUET, "Le droit romain à l’origine de la légitimité politique occidentale" (Paris: Collège de France)

 

(image source: Collège de France)

Introduction:

Comment les monarques européens ont-ils légitimé leur pouvoir pendant des siècles ? Au cœur de cette question se trouve un héritage souvent méconnu, mais décisif, celui du droit romain. Bien après la chute de l’Empire romain, cette tradition juridique a servi de socle intellectuel et institutionnel aux monarchies européennes. Elle a fourni des outils de gouvernement et une rhétorique de légitimation qui ont traversé les âges jusqu’à constituer les fondements de notre système politique contemporain. Rencontre avec François Waquet*, historien du droit romain au Collège de France.

On the interviewee:

François Waquet est chercheur en histoire du droit romain sur la chaire Droit, culture et société de la Rome antique du Pr Dario Mantovani.

Read the full interview here

19 November 2025

BOOK: Claudia MOATTI, Sur la politique. Cinq grandes leçons romaines [Lectures méditerranéennes] (Rome: École française de Rome, 2025), 308 p. ISBN 9782728318490, € 18

 

(image source: EFR)

Abstract:
Repenser la res publica, d’où vient (mais par quels détours, quels malentendus !) le terme moderne de « république », c’est, à travers l’expérience romaine antique, éclairer de grandes questions actuelles : qu’est-ce que le peuple ? Quelle part de conflictualité peut-on tolérer dans l’espace public ? La participation directe est-elle plus démocratique que le système représentatif, la liberté toujours désirable ? Quelle place reconnaître à l’Autre dans la cité ? Ou encore : comment un individu ou un groupe, en s’auto-proclamant défenseur de la grandeur de l’État, devient-il autoritaire… ? En convoquant cinq grandes notions romaines (res publica, seditio, populus, libertas, societas), cet ouvrage met la politique à l’épreuve de la langue latine et les concepts en tension avec les pratiques et les conflits de sens. Il analyse aussi quelques-unes de leurs reconfigurations dans d’autres périodes et selon d’autres enjeux, non pour établir des continuités ou des ressemblances, mais pour affiner les questions et faire comprendre l’importance de la référence au passé pour appréhender les défis contemporains.

On the author:

Claudia Moatti, ancienne membre de l’École française de Rome, est professeure émérite à l’université Paris 8 et professeure à l’University of Southern California. Elle a étudié les transformations intellectuelles de la société romaine à l’époque républicaine (La Raison de Rome, Seuil, 1998), et les capacités administratives de l’État impérial (archives foncières, contrôle de la mobilité humaine). Son livre le plus récent analyse le processus de formalisation de la res publica jusqu’au IIIe siècle de notre ère (Res publica. Histoire romaine de la chose publique, Fayard, 2018).

Read more here

 


12 November 2025

ENCYCLOPEDIA: Marguerite RONIN, "Une histoire de l'eau dans le droit romain" (EHNE, Sorbonne-Université, NOV 2025)

(image source: EHNE)

First paragraph:

L’eau constitue à la fois une ressource naturelle indispensable à de nombreuses activités économiques et sociales, mais peut également engendrer des risques dommageables à ces activités. Dans le monde romain, cette dynamique des opportunités et des risques est bien reflétée par les règles juridiques. Leur étude montre que les juristes et les institutions envisageaient le contrôle de l’eau avant tout à travers la protection d’usages comme l’irrigation, le drainage, ou le transport fluvial, dans le respect des intérêts particuliers et de l’intérêt général. L’héritage du droit romain mérite cependant aujourd’hui d’être adapté, car il est peu approprié au nouvel enjeu que constitue la protection des ressources et des écosystèmes.

Read the contribution here

31 October 2025

BOOK: Eleanor COWAN, Kit MORRELL, Andrew PETTINGER & Michael SEVEL (eds.), The Rule of Law in Ancient Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025), ISBN 9780198959328

 

(image source: OUP)

Abstract:

This volume brings together the study of the rule of law—the idea that the law should protect citizens from arbitrary exercises of power—and the study of ancient Rome. Its chapters apply insights and approaches drawn from modern legal theory in order to understand the ways in which Romans thought about law and the place of law in their community, the extent to which Roman institutions and political norms protected citizens against the arbitrary exercise of power, and how these ideas and practices changed with Rome’s transition from republic to empire. Part I offers an overview of the modern concept of the rule of law and some of the challenges and possibilities of seeking a rule of law in ancient Rome. Part II focuses on the Roman republic and the relationship between key institutions and the law (including the senate, magistrates, people, and state religion), as well as the attitudes of some prominent late republican individuals towards the rule of law. Part III on the principate and empire explores aspirations for the rule of law in the wake of civil war, the relationship between the emperor and the law, and the nature of the emperor’s role as above the law but guarantor of justice. Together, the chapters reveal a world where elements of the rule of law are recognizable but inconsistently realized and sometimes subordinate to alternative ideals of justice, popular sovereignty, or the personal authority of individuals.

Table of  contents:

Introduction
Framing Questions
1:The Rule of Law: A Thought Pattern, Michael Sevel
2:In Search of a Roman Rule of Law, Michael Peachin
The Republic
3:Cato and the Rule of Law, Kit Morrell
4:The Populus and the Rule of Law, Amy Russell
5:'Rule of Law' and the Gods in the Late Republic, Catherine Steel
6:The Praetor's Edict and the Rule of Law, Andrew Pettinger
7:Non Iure Rogata: The People, the Senate, and the Rule of Law in Republican Rome, W. Jeffrey Tatum
8:Not in the Last Instance, Andrew M. Riggsby
Principate and Empire
9:Aspiration, Accountability, and Abuse: Augustus and the Law in Post-Conflict Rome, Eleanor Cowan
10:Princeps legibus solutus est an non? Cultures of Legality in the Roman Empire, Tristan S. Taylor
11:The Emperor as the Good Judge: The Emergence of Roman Imperial Jurisdiction as a Discourse on Justice and Rule of Law, Kaius Tuori
12:Some Remarks on Certainty Roman Law, Cosimo Cascione

Read more here: DOI 10.1093/9780198959359.001.0001.

30 June 2025

BOOK: Ulrike BABUSIAUX, Christian BALDUS, Wolfgang ERNST, Franz-Stefan MEISSEL, Johannes PLATSCHEK & Thomas RÜFNER (Hrsg.), Handbuch des Römischen Privatrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2023), XCVI + 3707 p., € 629

 

(image source: Mohr Siebeck)

Abstract:

Das Handbuch des Römischen Privatrechts gilt dem römischen Privat- und Zivilprozessrecht von den ältesten römischen Rechtsquellen bis zur Zeit Justinians. Erstmals seit fünfzig Jahren erfolgt eine umfassende Darstellung auf der Höhe des aktuellen Forschungsstandes. Das Werk bietet sachkundige Orientierung angesichts der Vielzahl der Forschungsgegenstände und der stetig reicher werdenden Sekundärliteratur. Es dient auch Althistorikern, Klassischen Philologen, anderen Geisteswissenschaftlern und Vertretern des geltenden Rechts als Nachschlagewerk und erhebt den Anspruch, ein Bezugspunkt der internationalen römisch-rechtlichen Forschung zu sein. Der Schwerpunkt der Darstellung liegt auf der Diskussion der spätrepublikanischen und kaiserzeitlichen römischen Jurisprudenz, wobei eine intensive Bezugnahme auf den Prozess erfolgt. Die juristische Papyrologie und Epigraphik sind ebenso berücksichtigt wie die provinziale Rechtspraxis.

On the editors:

Ulrike Babusiaux ist Professorin für Römisches Recht, Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung an der Universität Zürich. Christian Baldus Studium der Rechtswissenschaft in Passau, Pavia und Trier; Referendariat in Koblenz; Promotion und Habilitation in Köln; Professor für Bürgerliches Recht und Römisches Recht in Heidelberg und Direktor am Institut für geschichtliche Rechtswissenschaft. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-0410 Wolfgang Ernst ist Regius Professor of Civil Law an der University of Oxford. Franz-Stefan Meissel ist Professor für Römisches Recht an der Universität Wien. Johannes Platschek ist Professor für Römisches Recht, Antike Rechtsgeschichte und Bürgerliches Recht an der LMU München. Thomas Rüfner ist Professor für Bürgerliches Recht, Römisches Recht, Neuere Privatrechtsgeschichte sowie Deutsches und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht an der Universität Trier.

Table of contents:

Band I
1. Abschnitt: Grundlagen
Rechtsentstehung und Rechtsverwirklichung - Überlieferung der Quellen
2. Abschnitt: Zivilprozess und Handlungsformen
Entwicklungsstufen des Zivilprozesses - Handlungsformen im Privatrecht
3. Abschnitt: Personen
Person und Handlungsfähigkeit - Hausverband (familia)
4. Abschnitt: Vermögensrecht (res)
Eigentum und Besitz - Beschränkte dingliche Rechte (iura in re aliena) - Erbschaft und Erbgang

Band II
5. Abschnitt: Rechtsdurchsetzung (actiones)
Dingliche Klagen (actiones in rem - Klagen mit adiudicatio - Persönliche Klagen (actiones in personam): 1. Actio und obligation- 2. Condictiones - 3. Klagen nach Treu und Glauben (bonae fidei iudicia) - 4. Deliktische und quasi-deliktische Klagen - 5. Rechtsschutz für erbrechtliche Ansprüche

Haftung für Gewaltunterworfene - Einreden (exceptiones) und andere Verteidigungsmittel

Authors:

José Luis Alonso, Francisco Javier Andrés Santos, Lorena Atzeri, Ulrike Babusiaux, Ralph Backhaus, Christian Baldus, Federico Battaglia, Hans-Peter Benöhr †, Wolfram Buchwitz, Alfons Bürge, Pierangelo Buongiorno, Riccardo Cardilli, Amelia Castresana Herrero, Maria Floriana Cursi, Wojciech Dajczak, Tommaso dalla Massara, Paul J. du Plessis, Wolfgang Ernst, Iole Fargnoli, Thomas Finkenauer, Birgit Forgó-Feldner, Richard Gamauf, Jean-François Gerkens, Peter Gröschler, Susanne Hähnchen, Verena Halbwachs, Susanne Heinemeyer, Alessandro Hirata, Evelyn Höbenreich, Michel Humbert, Philipp Klausberger, Fabian Klinck, Georg Klingenberg †, Francesca Lamberti, Detlef Liebs, Sebastian Lohsse, Carla Masi Doria, Franz-Stefan Meissel, Ernest Metzger, Andreas Nitsch, Anna Novitskaya, Martin Pennitz, Guido Pfeifer, Pascal Pichonnaz, Peter Pieler †, Johannes Platschek, Anna Plisecka, Johannes Michael Rainer, José-Domingo Rodríguez Martín, Thomas Rüfner, David Rüger, Dietmar Schanbacher, Philipp Scheibelreiter, Philipp Schmieder, Jakob Fortunat Stagl, Emanuele Stolfi, Benedikt Strobel, Mario Varvaro, Tom Walter, Adolfo Wegmann Stockebrand, Constantin Willems, Markus Wimmer, Bénédict Winiger, Bastian Zahn 

Read more here

 

 

23 June 2025

BOOK: Joanna KULAWIAK-CYRANKOWSKA, "Utilitas" in Roman Jurists' Legal Interpretation [Potsdamer Altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge, eds. Elisabeth BEGEMANN, Filippo CARLA-UHINK & Katharina WESSELMANN; 88 ] (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2025), 262 p. ISBN 9783515136686, €52

 

(image source: Franz Steiner Verlag)

Abstract:

This study offers a comprehensive analysis of utilitas, a central concept in Roman law, and its pivotal role in shaping legal interpretation. Moving beyond its traditional view as a merely pragmatic tool, utilitas is shown to guide legal outcomes that not only address practical needs but also align with broader ethical values of righteousness and justice. It argues that a complete understanding of utilitas in legal reasoning – both in meaning and function – can only be achieved by synthesizing jurisprudential, philosophical, and rhetorical perspectives. Through this interdisciplinary lens the book demonstrates that decisions made utilitatis causa, exceptional in their departure from established legal rules, can only be fully understood through the lens of rhetorical theory of legal interpretation, offering a framework that transcends the limitations of literal interpretation. Contributing to ongoing scholarly discourse in Roman law, legal theory, and philosophy, this study provides fresh insights into a concept that remains central to contemporary discussions of legal interpretation and justice.

On the author:

 Joanna Kulawiak-Cyrankowska is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Roman Law at the University of Lodz, Poland, where she teaches Roman Law and Latin. She holds a doctorate in Law and a Master's degree in Classical Philology. Currently, Kulawiak-Cyrankowska is the principal investigator of the Polish National Science Centre-funded project „In a Distorting Mirror? Law as Presented in Roman Satire“. She is also a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Bamberg, Germany, contributing to the ERC Consolidator Grant-funded project „Understanding Late Antique Top-Down Communication: A Study of Imperial Constitutions (AntCoCo)“.

Read more here

19 June 2025

BOOK: IUSTINIANUS, Corpus Iuris Civilis (transl. Dominique GAURIER) (Paris: La Mémoire du Droit, 2025), 5368 p., € 1980

(image source: La Mémoire du Droit)


 Pour la première fois depuis plus de deux siècles, le Corpus Juris Civilis – fondement du droit occidental – bénéficie d’une traduction française intégrale entièrement renouvelée.

Grace à Dominique Gaurier, maître de conférences, et éminent spécialiste de droit romain et de culture juridique antique, cette édition représente bien plus qu’une simple mise à jour :

➡️ Elle restitue avec rigueur philologique et exigence doctrinale la pensée juridique romaine dans un français contemporain, accessible sans être appauvri.

➡️ Elle propose un appareil critique actualisé, ancré dans l’état le plus récent de la recherche sur les sources, les contextes historiques et l’interprétation juridique.

➡️ Elle s’adresse aussi bien aux juristes, historiens, enseignants et chercheurs, qu’aux étudiants et lecteurs cultivés soucieux de comprendre les racines de notre droit.
 

Cette traduction permet enfin de lire Justinien – et les jurisconsultes qui le précèdent – sans filtre littéraire obsolète, sans archaïsmes, sans effets de style surannés.

Elle rétablit l’intelligence du texte originel, sa rigueur interne, et son actualité dans la formation de la pensée juridique moderne.

Une œuvre de référence. Une entreprise intellectuelle majeure.

Un classique, redevenu accessible et lisible

(read more here)

09 June 2025

CALL FOR PAPERS: Ius Commune in the Making: Meaning in Law [Ius Commune Workshop on Comparative Legal History] (Amsterdam: UvA, 27 NOV 2025) [DEADLINE 1 AUG 2025]

 

Ius Commune Workshop on Comparative Legal History

Ius Commune in the Making: Meaning in Law

27 November 2025

 

(Amsterdam door Robinson, Joseph - 1807 - The Royal Library: The National Library of Denmark and Copenhagen University Library, Denmark - CC BY-NC-ND; source: Europeana).


The 29th Ius Commune Conference will take place in Amsterdam (27-28 November 2025), and a Workshop will be devoted to “Meaning in Law.”

 

The workshops on “Comparative Legal History – Ius Commune in the Making” aim to reveal and understand the nature and effects of various legal formants in the development of law. Indeed, forces of legal formants are too often lost or hidden beneath a superficies of commonalities. History is a living laboratory. In the past, we explored the role of legal actors (2014), legal sources (2016), force of local laws (2017), methods and dynamics of law (2018), networks (2019), paradigmatic shifts (2020), great debates in the history of law (2021), the concept of innovation in law (2023), and manifestations of nature in law (2024).

 

This upcoming workshop is dedicated to the different conceptions of “meaning” in law. What is understood by meaning? On a working level, it may be taken up as “interpretation” of rules or juridical acts, or as “qualification” of facts. There it provides for a wide realm of comparative historical research. It does cover in essence everything, concerning individual and societal intention and action - and whatever over time is part of the legal domain. Legal methodology is just around the corner, and so is political philosophy - to any individual person, or to institutions such as legislators, judges, and professors. To get to the meaning of a legislative, judicial, or jurisprudential norm: why are some schools of thought, such as textualism, originalism, contextualism, or sociological jurisprudence, preferred over others?

 

Maxims or principles enlighten the cobbled roads towards meaning in law. In claris cessat interpretatio - if words are clear, interpretation stops; even so: though the Praetor’s edict could be perfectly clear, still its interpretation should not be neglected, Ulpian makes clear (D 25.4.1.11). Matters not dealt with in law, may be derived by analogy - Julian (D 1.3.12) - if such makes sense in the light of what has been prescribed. At the same time, concepts may have a range of consecutive (legal history) and parallel (comparative law) meanings in the legal domain - even in the same society or jurisdiction. Contracts have been similarly understood based on texts or contexts; understanding contracts gave birth to similar maxims, which methodological toolboxes show, albeit with large differences, both of the civil law and the common law traditions. The meaning of a rule or a fact is, however, not only determined by the method of logical and/or empirical reasoning - but also by (tradition of) explicit consensus, customs, and religion. Is there a hierarchy? In any way - all modes of finding and justification of meaning are interrelated, react and overlap, and ultimately may contribute. Traditional customs, specifically proven, meeting rational standards and natural, canonical aequitas might not only be accepted, but might even trump mandatory statutes; natural aequitas similarly might give birth to an actio utilis where traditional and consensual law did not. What is meaning in law? Certainty too often seems to be in contemporary law the prime virtue. It is not. There is hierarchy here. In the quest for a good life, veritas and fides have more important seats at the table - always headed by the bright sun of justice.

 

Senior researchers and PhD candidates are invited to submit an abstract of a paper related to the above-mentioned theme. Abstracts (max. 400 words) should be sent to Agustín Parise (agustin.parise@maastrichtuniversity.nl) no later than 1 August 2025. Shortly after that, the authors will be informed whether their papers are selected for a presentation during the Workshop. All contributions should be in English. Co-authored papers will be also considered. The organizing committee will give preference to early-career researchers when facing submissions of similar quality.

 

Researchers from within and outside the Ius Commune Research School will be eligible to present abstracts. Please also forward this call to colleagues who might be interested.

 

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact a member of the organizing committee,

Harry Dondorp (j.h.dondorp@vu.nl)

Wouter Druwé (wouter.druwe@kuleuven.be)

Michael Milo (j.m.milo@uu.nl)

Pim Oosterhuis (janwillem.oosterhuis@maastrichtuniversity.nl)

Agustín Parise (agustin.parise@maastrichtuniversity.nl)

 

28 May 2025

BOOK: Wojciech DAJCZAK, Martin AVENARIUS, Christian BALDUS (eds.), Mitteleuropa und das römische Recht. Methodische Herausforderungen an die Romanistik im Kontext der neuen politischen Ordnung nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg [Ius Romanum; 11] (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2025), 319 p., ISBN 978-3-16-163956-2

Cover von 'undefined'
ABOUT THE BOOK:
 
Paul Koschakers 1947 publiziertes Buch Europa und das römische Recht löste Diskussionen und Kontroversen über die kulturelle Bedeutung des römischen Rechts für die europäische Rechtsidentität und den Verlauf der Ostgrenze Europas aus. Der vorliegende Band nimmt Bezug auf Koschakers Werk. Die Bedeutung des römischen Rechts für die Rechtsidentität Mitteleuropas nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg stellt sich hier und heute völlig anders dar als bei Koschaker und in der von ihm inspirierten Diskussion. Das Leitmotiv besteht in der Frage, ob und wie methodische Innovationen und Probleme der römisch-rechtlichen Forschung, die vor allem aus Italien und Deutschland bekannt sind, das Studium des römischen Rechts in den Ländern beeinflussten, die nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg in Mitteleuropa wiedergeboren oder gegründet wurden. Grundlage hierfür sind Rekonstruktionen methodischer Profile ausgewählter Romanisten aus der Region.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
 
Joanna Kruszyńska-Kola: Römisches Recht an den mittelosteuropäischen Universitäten in der Zwischenkriegsperiode (1918-1939) - Bulgarien / Konstantin Tanev: The Beginning of History of Law And Roman Law Studies and the Changes of Scientific Method during the Interwar Period in Bulgaria - Estland / Hesi Siimets-Gross/Marju Luts-Sootak: Methodenwechsel durch Generationenwechsel - Romanistik an der estnischen Universität zu Tartu - Lettland / Janis Lazdins/Sanita Osipova: Das Studium des römischen Rechts in der Lettischen Republik in der Zwischenkriegsperiode (1919-1940): Professor Benedikt Cornelius Georg Frese, Professor Vassily Sinaisky und sein Schüler Voldemars Kalninsch - Polen / Wojciech Dajczak: Franciszek Bossowski - ein Privatrechtler, der sich im wiedergeborenen Polen dem römischen Recht widmete - Franciszek Longchamps de Bérier: Borys Łapicki: Marxism as a Remedy for the Crisis in Roman Law - Rumänien / Mihnea-Dan Radu Ștefan Longinescu and Constantin Stoicescu - Important Romanists of the Interwar Period - Sowjetrussland / Martin Avenarius: Bürgerliches Recht im revolutionären Russland. Verteidigung und Fortentwicklung des bedrohten Privatrechtsdenkens bei Pokrovskij und Kantorovič - Tschechoslowakei / Jakub Razim: Miroslav Boháček: Ein tschechoslowakischer Wissenschaftler von europäischem Rang - Pavel Salák jr.: Heyrovský und Sommer - Gründer und Nachfolger - Ungarn / Gergely Deli: Der Grosschmid-Effekt - oder ein Paradigmenwechsel in der ungarischen Romanistik - Emese Újvári: Methodenkonformität der ungarischen Romanistik? Anhaltspunkte aus der ersten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts im Werk von Géza Kiss und Kálmán Személyi 
 
Find more here.