Search

Showing posts with label Law and Humanities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law and Humanities. Show all posts

09 April 2026

SSRN PAPER: Elen STOKES, "Hope as an Object of Legal Scholarship" [OPEN ACCESS]

 

(image: Bristol; Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Abstract:

This paper explores what it might mean for hope to be an object of legal scholarship. It raises questions about what to look for and where to look for it, framing the discussion around hopeful legal ends, means, attachments and atmospheres. It finds that the relationship between law and hope can be characterised by multiplicity, and that this invites a wide range of approaches to engaging with hope in and around law.

On the author:

Elen Stokes University of Bristol

More information here: DOI 10.2139/ssrn.5893144.    

(source: Law & Humanities Blog)

 

15 January 2024

JOURNAL: LawArt. Rivista di Diritto, Arte, Storia IV (2023) [OPEN ACCESS]

(Image source: Giappichelli editore)


APERTURE/OVERTURES

PERCORSI/ITINERARIES: Entanglements nel diritto dell’arte: beni, patrimonio e circolazione / Entanglements in Art Law: Goods, Heritage, and Circulation 

DIALOGHI/COLLOQUIA

RIFRAZIONI. A PROPOSITO DI LAWART/REFRACTIONS. ABOUT LAWART

CROCEVIA/CROSSOVER


More information can be found here.

06 June 2022

L&C Talk: Daniel QUIROGA-VILLAMARIN, ""Suitable Palaces": Navigating Layers of World Ordering at the Centre William Rappard (1923-2013)" (Brussels: VUB, 10 JUNE 2022) [Hybrid]

 

(Source: VUB CORE)

Daniel Quiroga-Villamarin, currently visiting our research group from Geneva, will hold an L&C Talk on Friday 10 June. This talk will be hybrid (on-campus - Vergaderzaal PE (3C204) and online, on Teams).

Abstract:

While the intellectual trajectories of international law's "move to Institutions" in the early twentieth century has been often explored in the literature, most accounts divorce their analysis from the seemingly banal histories of "buildings, staffs, and letterheads." Conversely, in this article, I place the spatiality of the Centre William Rappard at the forefront of the history of 20th century internationalisms. Erected to serve the International Labor Organization (in 1926), this building was, among other things, repurposed to host the World Trade Organization (in 1975). In this piece, I reconstruct how struggles over claims of universality can be explored through disputes related to the materiality of this infrastructure of global governance.

 

Please contact Arno Swyngedouw for the MS Teams Link:  arno.swyngedouw@vub.be 



21 January 2020

SUMMER SCHOOL: Law and Humanities Summer School 2020 (Luzern, 15-19 June 2020) (DEADLINE: 1 March 2020)




We learned of the annual summer school in law and humanities, which is organized in Luzern this year.

The 2020 Summer School will focus on the entanglements of law, art and politics. From statues of the Roman Emperors to Picasso’s Guernica, some of the world’s most celebrated works of art have been explicitly political. But in the twenty-first century everything has been disrupted – including law, including art, including politics. We live in a world obsessed by images and distrustful of politics; a world in which the public sphere is collapsing and private interests seem more powerful than ever. What, then, is the role of art in making and unmaking, representing and challenging the language of law and the power of politics? Can art disrupt the disruptors?
Starting from this contemporary perspective, the school will offer a panorama of the dynamic intercourse between law, art and politics across a variety of sites, contexts and periods. The programme will draw on the expertise of scholars working in different research fields and across multiple critical traditions to address such questions as:
  • How do aesthetics and images shape the character of law?
  • What role does art play in transmitting legal and political ideology, or in fostering critique and social change?
  • How might we understand the relations between modes of artistic cultural expression and legal identities?
  • What are the effects of art’s material manifestations on the law?
  • How does art participate in, activate, or reflect upon the imagining of legal futures?

More info can be found here

30 September 2019

CALL FOR PAPERS: 2020 Law and Humanities Junior Scholars Workshop (Los Angeles, 7-8 June 2020) (DEADLINE: 2 December 2019)


(Source: H-Announce)

Via H-Announce, we learned of the 2020 Law and Humanities Junior Scholars Workshop.

2020 LAW AND HUMANITIES JUNIOR SCHOLARS WORKSHOP

Call for Papers

Columbia Law School, Georgetown University Law School, Stanford Law School, UCLA School of Law, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Southern California Center for Law, History, and Culture invite submissions for the nineteenth meeting of the Law and Humanities Junior Scholars Workshop, to be held at UCLA School of Law in Los Angeles, CA, on Sunday, June 7, and Monday, June 8, 2020. 

ABOUT THE WORKSHOP

The paper competition is open to untenured professors, advanced graduate students, and post-doctoral scholars in law and the humanities. In addition to drawing from numerous humanistic fields, we welcome critical, qualitative work in the social sciences. We are especially interested in submissions from members of traditionally underrepresented groups.  We welcome submissions from those working at regional and teaching-intensive institutions.

Based on anonymous evaluation by an interdisciplinary selection committee, between five and ten papers will be chosen for presentation at the June Workshop. At the Workshop, two senior scholars will comment on each paper. Commentators and other Workshop participants will be asked to focus specifically on the strengths and weaknesses of the selected scholarly projects, with respect to subject and methodology. The selected papers will then serve as the basis for a larger conversation among all the participants about the evolving standards by which we judge excellence and creativity in interdisciplinary scholarship, as well as about the nature of interdisciplinarity itself.

The selected papers will appear in a special issue of the Legal Scholarship Network; there is no other publication commitment. (We will accommodate the wishes of chosen authors who prefer not to have their paper posted publicly with us because of publication commitments to other journals.)

The Workshop will pay the domestic travel and hotel expenses of authors whose papers are selected for presentation. For authors requiring airline travel from outside the United States, the Workshop will cover such travel expenses up to a maximum of $1000.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Papers must be works-in-progress that do not exceed 15,000 words in length (including footnotes/ endnotes); most papers selected for inclusion in recent years have been at least 10,000 words long. An abstract of no more than 200 words must also be included with the paper submission. A dissertation chapter may be submitted, but we strongly suggest that it be edited so as to stand alone as a piece of work with its own integrity. A paper that has been submitted for publication is eligible for selection so long as it will not be in galley proofs or in print at the time of the Workshop; it is important that authors still be in a position at the time of the Workshop to consider comments they receive there and to incorporate them as they think appropriate in their revisions.

We ask that those submitting papers be careful to omit or redact any information in the body of the paper that might serve to identify them, as we adhere to an anonymous or “blind” selection process.

Submissions (in Microsoft Word—no pdf files, please) will be accepted until December 2, 2019, and should be sent by e-mail to: juniorscholarsworkshop@sas.upenn.edu. Please be sure to include your name, institutional affiliation (if any), and phone and e-mail contact information in your covering email, not in the paper itself.

For more information, please send an email inquiry to juniorscholarsworkshop@sas.upenn.edu.

To see selected papers from some previous years’ workshops, go to:

Anne Dailey, University of Connecticut Law School
Katherine Franke, Columbia Law School
Sarah Barringer Gordon, University of Pennsylvania
Nan Goodman, University of Colorado
Ariela Gross, University of Southern California
Martha Jones, Johns Hopkins University
Naomi Mezey, Georgetown University Law Center
Paul Saint-Amour, University of Pennsylvania
Hilary Schor, University of Southern California
Norman Spaulding, Stanford Law School
Clyde Spillenger, UCLA School of Law
Nomi Stolzenberg, University of Southern California
Martha Umphrey, Amherst College

Conveners, 2020 Law and Humanities Junior Scholars Workshop

Contact Email: 


More info here

23 September 2019

FELLOWSHIP: Witteveen Memorial Fellowship in Law and Humanities (DEADLINE: 15 November 2019)



Tilburg University has a call for applications for the Witteveen Memorial Fellowship in Law and Humanities. Here the call:

Professor Willem Witteveen (1952-2014) was an early representative of the interdisciplinary and contextual approach to legal scholarship in the Netherlands. Whereas the emphasis of this approach has often been on the social sciences, Professor Witteveen’s focus was on intersections between law and the humanities. Professor Witteveen’s many contributions to academia, politics and society combined rhetoric, literary analysis, political philosophy and intellectual and cultural history. In his teaching, Professor Witteveen embraced the classic Bildungsideal, and put textual interpretation at the heart of his classes. He fostered an academic environment that revolved around thinking and discussing.

After Professor Witteveen’s untimely death in 2014, Tilburg University established the annual Witteveen Memorial Fellowship in Law and Humanities in order to commemorate his life and work. The fellowship aims to enable a junior scholar (PhD or postdoc level) to develop her or his research in the field of law and humanities during a visit to Tilburg. The fellowship seeks to promote research on the relations between law and language, rhetoric, narrative, image, sound, and/or culture.

What the Witteveen Memorial Fellowship in Law and Humanities offers
The Witteveen Memorial Fellow will have office space and facilities at Tilburg Law School, as well as full library access.

We offer reimbursement of travel expenses and accommodation expenses (max. 5,250 Euro). The Witteveen Memorial Fellowship does not constitute an employment relationship. For this reason, Tilburg Law School will not pay salary and will not make social insurance contributions or contributions to pension or unemployment insurance. Fellows will need to find their own accommodation.

In principle, the Witteveen Memorial Fellow in Law and Humanities will be at Tilburg Law School for the duration of three months in the spring following the application deadline. Candidates are welcome to propose a different period. In case the fellow will visit for less than three months, the maximum amount to be reimbursed will be proportionately lower. If the fellow’s visit will be longer, the total amount to be reimbursed remains 5,250 Euro.

What is expected of the Witteveen Memorial Fellow
During the period of the fellowship the scholar will be present at Tilburg Law School, participate in the academic life of both Tilburg Law School and the Tilburg School of Humanities, and deliver a guest lecture to students. Any publications resulting from the fellowship should mention the Witteveen Memorial Fellowship in Law and Humanities explicitly.

Eligible Candidates
Scholars who are currently working on a PhD dissertation (at least in the third or fourth year of their PhD trajectory) or who obtained their PhD within the last five years are eligible.

Application
Candidates are requested to submit their application before 15 November 2019. Applications can only be submitted online. Candidates must submit a cover letter, a CV including a list of publications, a statement of intent (‘what do you plan to do during the fellowship?’, ‘what is the end product?’) and one letter of recommendation.

In principle, the selection committee will decide on the basis of the written application only. The extent to which a candidate’s background is in law and humanities as well as evidence of interaction between both disciplines in the candidate’s work is an important selection criterion.

For questions, please contact Prof. Vanessa Mak (substantive questions) and/or Jacoba de Jong (other questions). They can both be reached at frw.pz@tilburguniversity.edu.

Tilburg Law School
Tilburg Law School (TLS) staat voor kwaliteit, met brede, internationale opleidingen en innovatief onderzoek. Het onderzoek van Tilburg Law School vindt plaats in een organisatie waar ruimte is voor diversiteit. De Tilburg Graduate Law School is verantwoordelijk voor de opleiding en begeleiding van promovendi en onderzoeksmasterstudenten. De inspirerende en open cultuur maakt het werken plezierig.

Sollicitatiecode
Tilburg University hanteert de 
NVP-sollicitatiecode van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Personeelsmanagement & Organisatieontwikkeling.

Disclaimer
De tekst in deze vacatureadvertentie is auteursrechtelijk beschermd eigendom van Tilburg University. Gebruik, verspreiding en verdere openbaarmaking van de advertentie zonder uitdrukkelijke toestemming van Tilburg University is niet toegestaan en dat geldt expliciet voor gebruik door werving- en selectiebureaus welke niet rechtstreeks handelen in opdracht van de Tilburg University. Reacties naar aanleiding van werving door niet-opdrachtnemers van Tilburg University

More info here



17 September 2019

BOOK: Simon STERN, Maksymilian DEL MAR & Bernadette MEYLER (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities [Oxford Handbooks] (Oxford: OUP, 2019), 896 p. ISBN 9780190695620, 175 GBP

(image source: OUP)

Book abstract:
How does materiality matter to legal scholarship? What can affect studies offer to legal scholars? What are the connections among visual studies, art history, and the knowledge and experience of law? What can the disciplines of book history, digital humanities, performance studies, disability studies, and post-colonial studies contribute to contemporary and historical understandings of law? These are only some of the important questions addressed in this wide-ranging collection of law and humanities scholarship. Collecting 45 new essays by leading international scholars, The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities showcases the work of law and humanities across disciplines, addressing methods, concepts and themes, genres, and areas of the law. The essays explore under-researched domains such as comics, videos, police files, form contracts, and paratexts, and shed new light on traditional topics, such as free speech, intellectual property, international law, indigenous peoples, immigration, evidence, and human rights. The Handbook provides an exciting new agenda for scholarship in law and humanities, and will be essential reading for anyone interested in the intersections of law and humanistic inquiry.
(read more with OUP)

11 February 2019

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: Spring School – Law and Humanities (Rome, 15-18 April 2019) (DEADLINE: 15 March 2019)



We learned of a Spring School on Law and Humanities, to be organised at Rome Tre University.

We are proud to announce the first Law and Humanities Spring School at RomaTre. This event sees the participation of experts in the field coming from different countries, thanks to the collaboration between the RomaTre University, the Australian National University and the University of Lucerne.

The Spring School will take place at the RomaTre University Law Department, Via Ostiense 161, 00154 Rome (room t.b.a.).

All people interested are invited to apply for participation. Please send a brief letter of motivation in English (max 1 page) and a CV to the following email address: 

lawandhumanitiesrome@gmail.com.   
                                                                                                   
Deadline: 15 March 2019

You can read the program below or download the pdf Law and Humanities Spring School RomaTre 2019:

15 April
S1) Emanuele Conte: Music, Liturgy and the Construction of the People as a subject (morning)
S2) Fiona Macmillan: Intellectual and Cultural Properties: Between Market and Community (afternoon)

16 April
S1) Desmond Manderson (with E. Conte and A. Condello): Contemporary critical theory: authoritarianism, populism and crisis (morning)
S2) Steven Howe: Law, Cinema and Popular Culture (afternoon)

17 April
S1) Mariano Croce: Postcritical law: The transformative potential of law-users (morning)
S2) Desmond Manderson: Working with images: the rule of art and the rule of law (afternoon)

18 April
S1)  Sum up session (morning)


30 November 2018

BOOK: Yann ROBERT, Dramatic Justice : Trial by Theater in the Age of the French Revolution (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018). ISBN 9780812250756, £61.00


(Source: UPenn Press)

University of Pennsylvania Press has published a book on French theater and judicial practice during the Age of the French Revolution.  

ABOUT THE BOOK

For most of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, classical dogma and royal censorship worked together to prevent French plays from commenting on, or even worse, reenacting current political and judicial affairs. Criminal trials, meanwhile, were designed to be as untheatrical as possible, excluding from the courtroom live debates, trained orators, and spectators. According to Yann Robert, circumstances changed between 1750 and 1800 as parallel evolutions in theater and justice brought them closer together, causing lasting transformations in both.

Robert contends that the gradual merging of theatrical and legal modes in eighteenth-century France has been largely overlooked because it challenges two widely accepted narratives: first, that French theater drifted toward entertainment and illusionism during this period and, second, that the French justice system abandoned any performative foundation it previously had in favor of a textual one. In Dramatic Justice, he demonstrates that the inverse of each was true. Robert traces the rise of a "judicial theater" in which plays denounced criminals by name, even forcing them, in some cases, to perform their transgressions anew before a jeering public. Likewise, he shows how legal reformers intentionally modeled trial proceedings on dramatic representations and went so far as to recommend that judges mimic the sentimental judgment of spectators and that lawyers seek private lessons from actors. This conflation of theatrical and legal performances provoked debates and anxieties in the eighteenth century that, according to Robert, continue to resonate with present concerns over lawsuit culture and judicial entertainment.

Dramatic Justice offers an alternate history of French theater and judicial practice, one that advances new explanations for several pivotal moments in the French Revolution, including the trial of Louis XVI and the Terror, by showing the extent to which they were shaped by the period's conflicted relationship to theatrical justice.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Yann Robert teaches French and Francophone studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. THEATER AS JUSTICE
Chapter 1. Fixing the Law: Reenactment in Diderot's Fils naturel
Chapter 2. The Many Faces of Aristophanes: The Rise of a Judicial Theater

PART II. JUSTICE AS THEATER
Chapter 3. Players at the Bar: The Birth of the Modern Lawyer
Chapter 4. Judges, Spectators, and Theatrocracy
Chapter 5. From Parterre to Pater: Dreaming of Domestic Tribunals

PART III. THE REVOLUTION'S PERFORMANCE OF JUSTICE
Chapter 6. Performing Justice in the Early Years of the Revolution
Chapter 7. The Curtain Falls on Judicial Theater and Theatrical Justice

Notes
Bibliography
Index
Acknowledgments

More information here

11 August 2018

CALL FOR PAPERS: Law, Literature, and Psychoanalysis, 1890-1950, University of Sheffield, April 11-13, 2019 (DEADLINE 28 NOVEMBER 2018)


Via Law & Humanities Blog, we learned of a call for papers for a conference on “Law, Literature and Psychoanalysis, 1890-1950”. Here the call:

Keynotes:
Ravit Reichman (Brown University)
Lizzie Seal (University of Sussex)
Victoria Stewart (University of Leicester)

Call For Papers:

The twentieth-century was a period of worldwide literary experiment, of scientific developments and of worldwide conflict. These changes demanded a rethinking not merely of psychological subjectivity, but also of what it meant to be subject to the law and to punishment. This two-day conference aims to explore relationships between literature, law and psychoanalysis during the period 1890-1950, allowing productive mixing of canonical and popular literature and also encouraging interdisciplinary conversations between different fields of study.

The period examined by the conference included: developments in Freudian psychoanalysis and its branching in other directions; the founding of criminology; continuing campaigns and reforms around the death penalty; landmark modernist publications; the ‘Golden Age’ of detective fiction; and multiple sensational trials (Wilde, Crippen, Casement, Leopold and Loeb, to name but a few). Freud’s followers, like Theodor Reik and Hans Sachs, would publish work on criminal law and the death penalty; psychoanalysts were sought after as expert witnesses; novelists like Elizabeth Bowen would serve on a Royal Commission investigating capital punishment; while Gladys Mitchell invented the character of Beatrice Adela Lestrange Bradley as a literary detective-psychoanalyst.

We therefore hope to consider areas including literature’s connection with historical debates around crime and punishment; literature and authors on trial and/or on the ‘psychiatrist's couch’; and literature’s effect on debates about human rights. The event is linked to and partly supported by an AHRC project on literature, psychoanalysis and the death penalty, but the aim of this conference is much wider. Interdisciplinary approaches, especially from fields such as psychoanalysis, philosophy, law or the visual arts, are particularly encouraged. We also welcome papers on international legal systems and texts. All responses are welcome and the scope of our interdisciplinary interests is flexible, with room in the planned programme for strands of work that might be more or less literary. 
Possible topics might include: 

  • psychoanalysis in the real or literary courtroom;
  • literary form and the insanity defence;
  • canonical authors as readers of crime fiction and vice versa;
  • censorship cases;
  • the influence of famous legal cases on literary productions or on psychoanalytic theory;
  • influences of criminology and criminal psychology on literature;
  • representations of new execution methods (for example, the gas chamber and the electric chair);
  • portrayals of restorative versus retributive justice;
  • literary responses to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
  • relationships between modernism and Critical Legal Studies (CLS). 

Please send 250 word paper proposals or 300 word proposals for fully formed panels to Katherine Ebury 
litlawpsy2019@gmail.com by 28th November 2018.


29 May 2018

BOOK: Lorna HUTSON (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of English Law and Literature, 1500-1700 [Oxford Handbooks] (Oxford: OUP, 2017), 832 p. ISBN 9780199660889, GBP 95

(image source: OUP)

Book abstract: 
This Handbook triangulates the disciplines of history, legal history, and literature to produce a new, interdisciplinary framework for the study of early modern England. For historians of early modern England, turning to legal archives and learning more about legal procedure has seemed increasingly relevant to the project of understanding familial and social relations as well as political institutions, state formation, and economic change. Literary scholars and intellectual historians have also shown how classical forensic rhetoric formed the basis both of the humanist teaching of literary composition (poetry and drama) and of new legal epistemologies of fact-finding and evidence evaluation. In addition, the post-Reformation jurisdictional dominance of the common law produced new ways of drawing the boundaries between private conscience and public accountability. This Handbook brings historians, literary scholars, and legal historians together to build on and challenge these and similar lines of inquiry. Chapters in the Handbook consider the following topics in a variety of combinations: forensic rhetoric, poetics and evidence; humanist and legal learning; political and professional identities at the Inns of Court; poetry, drama, and visual culture; local governance and legal reform; equity, conscience, and religious law; legal transformations of social and affective relations (property, marriage, witchcraft, contract, corporate personhood); authorial liability (libel, censorship, press regulation); rhetorics of liberty, slavery, torture, and due process; nation, sovereignty, and international law (the British archipelago, colonialism, empire).
 Table of contents:
Introduction: Law, Literature and History, Lorna Hutson Part I. Textual and Interpretative Culture
1: Forensic Rhetoric and Humanist Education, Kathy Eden
2: Idiosyncratic Books and Common Learning: Readings on Statutes at the Inns of Court', Margaret McGlynn
3: Common Law Scholarship and the Written Word, Ian Williams
4: 'Attentive Mindes and Serious Wits': Legal Training and Early Drama, James McBain
5: Why Shylocke Loses his Case: Judicial Rhetoric in The Merchant of Venice, Quentin Skinner
Part II. Literature and the Legal Profession, 1500-1700
6: Legal Satire and the Legal Profession in the 1590s: John Davies' Epigrammes and Professional Decorum, Jessica Winston
7: The Emblem Book and Common Law, Peter Goodrich
8: The Monarchical Republic: Constitutionality and the Legal Profession, Paul Raffield
9: The Legal Masque: Humanity and Liberty at the Inns of Court, Martin Butler
10: Paradise Lost? Law, Literature, and History in Restoration England, Christopher Brooks
Part III. Administering the Law
11: Law Enforcement and the Local Community, James Sharpe
12: The Changing Persona of the Justices and their Quarter Sessions, Norma Landau
13: Law and the Evidentiary Environment, Barbara Shapiro
14: Legal Reform and 2 Henry IV, Virginia Strain
Part IV. Temporal and Spiritual, Law and Conscience 15: Immunities and Monasticism: Bale to Shakespeare, Joshua P. Phillips
16: Epieikeia and Conscience, Alan Cromartie
17: The Ecclesiastical Polity, Ethan Shagan
18: Making Law and Recording It: John Selden on Excommunication, Jason Rosenblatt
19: Seldenism, Elliott Visconsi
Part V. Legal and Literary Imagining
20: Contract, Luke Wilson
21: Contract and Conjugality in Early Modern England, Tim Stretton
22: The Literary Thing: The Imaginary Holding of Isabella Whitney's 'Wyll' to London, 1573, Carolyn Sale
23: Witch Wives, Frances Dolan 24: Corporate Persons, Between Law and Literature, Henry Turner
Part VI. Libel, Publication, and the Press
25: Edward Coke, Roman Law, and the Law of Libel, David Ibbetson
26: Censorship in Law and Practice in Seventeenth Century England: Milton's Aeropagitica, Joad Raymond
27: Managing the Later Stuart Press, 1662-1696, Martin Dzelzainis
28: The Torture of John Felton, 1628, Alastair Bellany Part VII. Liberties, Slaveries, and English Law 29: From Sovereignty to the State: The Tragicomic Clemency of Massinger's The Bondman, Bernadette Meyler
30: Birthrights and the Due Course of Law, Paul Halliday
31: Legal Agency as Literature in the English Revolution: The Case of the Levellers, Nigel Smith
32: Base Slavery and the Roman Yoke, Mary Nyquist
Part VIII. The Extra-English Legal World: Between Colony, Nation, and Empire
33: Spenser, Plowden, and the Hypallactic Instrument, Andrew Zurcher
34: Law and Literature in Scotland, c.1450-1707, Rab Houston
35: Forensic History: Henry V and Scotland, Lorna Hutson
36: Henry V, Anachronism, and the History of International Law, Christopher Warren
37: Empire and Natural Law in Dryden's Heroic Drama, Edward Holberton
38: English Liberties Outside England: Floors, Doors, Windows, and Ceilings in the Legal Architecture of Empire, Dan Hulsebosch
On the editor:
 Edited by Lorna Hutson, Merton Professor of English Literature, University of Oxford Lorna Hutson is Merton Professor of English Literature at the University of Oxford. Educated in San Francisco, Edinburgh, and Oxford, she has taught at the Universities of St Andrews, UC Berkeley, Hull, and Queen Mary, London. She has served as Head of English at St Andrews (2008-11) and has held fellowships from the Folger, the Huntingdon, the Guggenheim, and the Leverhulme Trust. Her books include Thomas Nashe in Context (1989), The Usurer's Daughter (1994), and The Invention of Suspicion (2007). Circumstantial Shakespeare (2015) was based on the Oxford Wells Shakespeare Lectures in 2012. She has also edited Ben Jonson's Discoveries (1641) for the Cambridge Complete Works of Ben Jonson (2012) and written numerous articles on Renaissance topics.
More information with OUP.

28 May 2018

CONFERENCE: Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities Conference 2 (London: Queen Mary School of Law, 14-15 June 2018)

(image source: findyourllm)

Time: 9:30am - 5:00pm 
Venue: 2.17 and 2.18, Arts Two, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS

The School of Law at Queen Mary University of London is delighted to host the second ‘Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities Conference’. The first will be held at Stanford University in May 2018 (for program see here). The conference will involve leading scholars in law and humanities who are contributing to the Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities, which is co-edited by Maks Del Mar, Simon Stern and Bernadette Meyler. For any inquiries, please contact m.delmar@qmul.ac.uk.

Programme

14 June

10am Tea and Coffee
10.30am Welcome from Simon Stern, Bernadette Meyler and Maks Del Mar

Panel 1

10.35am–12.30pm
Chair: Maks Del Mar
  • Henrike Manuwald, Book History
  • Carolin Behrmann, Visual Studies
  • Subha Mukherji, Proof/Evidence.
12.30pm–1.30pm Lunch

Panel 2

1.30pm–4pm
Chair: Alan Read
  • Julie Stone Peters, Interpreting Legal Performance
  • Marett Leiboff, Performance
  • Rex Ferguson, Trials
  • Timothy W. Hyde, Place/Space/Critical Geography
  • Shaun McVeigh, Jurisdiction.
4pm–4.30 Break (Tea and Coffee)

Panel 3

4.30pm–6.30pm
Chair: Isobel Roele
  • Renisa Mawani, Post-Colonial Studies BY SKYPE
  • Noa Ben Asher, Queer Theory
  • Panu Minkinnen, Agonism
  • Camille Gear Rich, Theories of Racialization
6.30pm – 7.15pm Drinks
7.30pm Dinner (Aryana’s Persian and Afghan Restaurant – 10 min walk from venue)

15 June

Panel 4

10-12pm
Chair: Michael Lobban
  • Steven Wilf, Treatises
  • Heikki Pihlajamäki, Codifications
  • Tal Kastner, Form Contracts
  • Ari Z. Bryen, Responsa.
12pm – 1pm Lunch

Panel 5

1pm – 3pm
Chair: Simon Stern
Ellen Spolsky, Cognitive Literary Studies
Susanna Blumenthal, Agency/Responsibility
Norman Spaulding, Memory/Trauma
3pm – 3.30pm Break (Tea and Coffee)

Panel 6

3.30pm – 5.30pm
Chair: Bernadette Meyler
  • Khiara M. Bridges, Family Law
  • Sherally Munshi, Immigration
  • Eric Heinze, Speech Regulation
  • Julia Simon-Kerr, Evidence/Crim Pro
5.30pm Conference ends

29 November 2016

CONFERENCE: The Art of Law: Artistic Representations and Iconography of Law & Justice in Context from the Middle Ages to the First World War (Bruges, Groeningemuseum, 16-18 Jan 2017)

(image source: TAOL)

Recent years have witnessed a clear rise in scholarship on law and the visual, mostly originating in the wider field of law and the humanities. The conference The Art of Law: Artistic Representations and Iconography of Law & Justice in Context from the Middle Ages to the First World War wishes to contribute to this research by focusing on imagery in its legal and art historical contexts. The program brings together original and interdisciplinary scholarship that questions the role of art in the practice of law, jurisprudence and justice administration from the Late Middle Ages through the Nineteenth Century.

The conference will be held in the Groeningemuseum, Bruges on Monday 16, Tuesday 17 and Wednesday 18 January, 2017, during the exhibition De Kunst van het Recht. Drie Eeuwen Gerechtigheid in Beeld (The Art of Law. Three Centuries of Justice Depicted) (28 October, 2016 – 5 February, 2017). This art exhibition, curated by Vanessa Paumen and Tine Van Poucke, features about 130 artworks from over 30 national and international museums and libraries and will focus on themes related to justice as expressed in artworks of various media from about 1450 through 1750.
The Art of Law is the closing conference of the IAP Justice and Populations’s WP4: Long-term (Self-)Representations of Justice (LongTermJust).

The conference is supported by
•    Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS
•    Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO)
•    Flemish Research Centre for the Arts of the Burgundian Netherlands
•    IAP Justice and Populations: The Belgian Experience in International Perspective

See conference website for final program, registration and practical details.

10 October 2016

NOTICE: "Power and Institutions in Law and Humanities. L&H 2016 Fall Calendar" (Rome, October-December 2016)


WHAT Power and Institutions in Law and Humanities. Law & Humanities 2016 Fall Calendar

WHEN October-December 2016

WHERE Roma Tre University

more information here

The Law and the Humanities Course, directed by Prof. Emanuele Conte, was first proposed in 2008, with the collaboration of Dr. Stefania Gialdroni. Since then, it has become a point of reference within the framework of the Studying Law at RomaTre Courses, entirely thaught in English.
Since the beginning, the unique structure of the course, based on the presence of different speakers each week, coming from a different part of the world, has been deepening the interactions between scholars and students. An important tool for this interaction have been the blogs of the "Law and the Humanities" course, now available at the following address: http://lawhumanitiesroma3.blogspot.it/.
Dr. Stefania Gialdroni (legal historian) and Dr. Angela Condello (legal philosopher) support the organization of the course

27 July 2016

CONFERENCE & CFP: "Justice, Mercy and Law: from revenge to forgiveness in the History of Law" (Murcia, December 13-16, 2016)




WHAT Justice, Mercy and Law: from revenge to forgiveness in the History of Law, Conference and Call for papers

WHEN December 13-16, 2016

WHERE Catedra Inocentio III, Murcia, Spain


 The main purpose of the Law has been to accomplish the Justice. However, the administration of the Justice has not always met the current models of the public justice, but it has greatly changed over the centuries. Likewise, the Justice has been understood in many ways, with predominance of the points of view that tend to comprehend it in a retributive way. On the other hand, the Justice has been understood as a way of repentance and expiation of the criminal sin, sometimes turned into a religious sin. 
For such purposes, we call on interested researchers to submit papers related to the figure of Innocent III from the standpoint of law in general, Canon Law, Philosophy, Theology, History of Institutions, Roman Law, Comparative Law, Art History, History, Sociology, Historiography and any other discipline that can shed light on the subject proposed, being the following: 


Program


 1. Public Justice 
a. Organization of the Justice in continental Europe. 
b. The legal process: Civil Justice and Ecclesiastical Justice. 
c. The imposition and compliance of the sentence. 
2. Private Justice 
a. Private revenge. 
b. Revenge for honor. 
c. Public consequences of the Private Justice. 
3. Forgiveness and Mercy 
a. Forgiveness as a way of discharging the criminal responsibility. 
b. The sentence as the penance for the sinner defendant. 
c. The mercy for the criminal/sinner. 

23 July 2016

BOOK: "Anonymous Speech. Literature, Law and Politics" by Eric Barendt (July 2016)


Anonymous Speech. Literature, Law and Politics, by Eric Barendt
all information here

Anonymous Speech: Literature, Law and Politics discusses the different contexts in which people write anonymously or with the use of a pseudonym: novels and literary reviews, newspapers and political periodicals, graffiti, and now on the Internet. The book criticises the arguments made for a strong constitutional right to anonymous speech, though it agrees that there is a good case for anonymity in some circumstances, notably for whistle-blowing. One chapter examines the general treatment of anonymous speech and writing in English law, while another is devoted to the protection of journalists’ sources, where the law upholds a freedom to communicate anonymously through the media. A separate chapter looks at anonymous Internet communication, particularly on social media, and analyses the difficulties faced by the victims of threats and defamatory allegations on the Net when the speaker has used a pseudonym. In its final chapter the book compares the universally accepted argument for the secret ballot with the more controversial case for anonymous speech.
This is the first comprehensive study of anonymous speech to examine critically the arguments for and against anonymity. These arguments were vigorously canvassed in the nineteenth century – largely in the context of literary reviewing – and are now of enormous importance for communication on the Internet.

About the Author

Eric Barendt is Emeritus Professor of Media Law at University College London.

17 November 2015

ROUND TABLE: "Image et Droit III. Du refus à la régulation des images" (Rome, November 23-25 2015)


WHAT Image et Droit III. Du refus à la régulation des images, roundtable

WHEN  November 23-25 2015

WHERE  École française de Rome, Piazza Navona 62, Rome

Cette dernière table ronde entend revenir sur le refus et la régulation des images, un thème qui a pris, ces derniers mois, une ampleur toute singulière.
En février 2015, l’attaque contre le musée de Mossoul et contre plusieurs oeuvres issues du patrimoine irakien provoquèrent la stupeur et l’incrédulité dans la presse et sur les réseaux sociaux. Ces destructions, qui font écho à celles des Bouddhas de Bâmiyân en 2001, témoignaient de la reviviscence d’un iconoclasme aux enjeux et aux contextes nouveaux. Les destructions, elles-mêmes soigneusement mises en image et en scène, ne posaient pas seulement la question de la licéité des représentations, mais désignaient sans fard le refus absolu des images - y compris celles dont les usages cultuels avaient disparu depuis des siècles- comme un signe de ralliement à une interprétation radicale d’un type d’islam. L’indignation qu’elle suscita sembla cependant oblitérer le fait que ces questions s’adossaient à une très longue histoire de la méfiance et de la relégation des images.
C’est cette histoire que la troisième rencontre du projet Image et Droit souhaite évoquer, celle d’une intense défiance que les images peuvent susciter, de l’abondante réflexion sur leur licéité, leur rejet et leur limitation. Quelles étaient celles qui demeuraient autorisées? Comment les restrictions et les régulations d’images pouvaient-elles produire de nouveaux types d’image? Dans un contexte ouvertement hostile à la représentation du vivant, les formes abstraites et l’ornementation furent-elles une des réponses visuelles à ce choix? Les destructions ou les occultations d’images furent-elles l’objet de codifications précises? Comment les destructions d’images entendaient-elles fonder sinon un nouvel ordre juridique qui ne se restreint pas à la simple question des images, du moins une nouvelle normativité des pratiques? Ces questions ne touchent pas seulement les images de culte, mais aussi, pour certaines périodes historiques, les représentations profanes et notamment le portrait dont la régulation ne fut pas seulement posée par les théologiens protestants, mais aussi par les révolutionnaires français qui légiférèrent précisément sur les retraits de certaines figures royales. Elles continuent encore aujourd’hui de préoccuper les représentants des Etats pour l’établissement des papiers d’identité où la question de la définition légitime de la ressemblance constitue l’objet d’une législation tatillonne. En somme, cette table ronde propose de repenser à nouveaux frais la question du droit des images. Il s’agira de voir combien sa limitation est à la fois l’objet et le produit de conflits juridiques, religieux et politiques, conduisant à de nouvelles définitions et de nouvelles élaborations d’images.


Programme

12 October 2015

CONFERENCE: Which Extra-Juridical Perceptions of the Constitution ? (Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3 - French Association of Constitutional Lawyers, 15 Oct 2015)

(image: the Salle Bourjac (Sorbonne), source: Paris 3)


Calenda.org highlights the program of an interesting interdisciplinary event on constitutions.

Summary:
Cette journée d'études pose une question simple, mais fondamentale et particulièrement peu envisagée, notamment en France : comment se conçoit et se représente la Constitution en dehors du cercle des juristes ?
Des chercheurs issus de diverses disciplines des sciences humaines, mais aussi des sciences formelles et de la nature, ont accepté d'y apporter leurs éléments de réponse.
Il s'agira à la fois de s'interroger sur la manière dont une discipline perçoit l'objet d'une autre discipline, de croiser les différents regards et, ainsi, non seulement de contribuer à accroître la connaissance que l'on a de la Constitution, mais aussi d'interroger de nouveau le regard de la discipline principalement intéressée, à savoir le droit constitutionnel.
La journée s'adresse à la fois aux juristes et à tous les chercheurs ou citoyens intéressés par la question constitutionnelle.
Program:
Début des travaux : 9 h
  • Mots d'accueil, Christine MANIGAND, Professeure d’histoire contemporaine, ICEE, Sorbonne Nouvelle
  • Introduction des débats, Dominique ROUSSEAU, Professeur de droit public, Panthéon-Sorbonne, 1ère partie : les perceptions de la notion de Constitution 9h30 – 12h30
  • L'inconscient constitutionnel : Kelsen avec Freud, Paul-Laurent ASSOUN, Professeur, Paris Diderot
  • Comment la langue produit la Constitution : loge d'initiés ou agora ? Propos de linguiste, Patrick RENAUD, Professeur émérite, Sorbonne Nouvelle
Pause
  • Que fut la Constitution du IIIè Reich. Point de vue d'un historien, Johann CHAPOUTOT, Professeur, La Sorbonne Nouvelle
  • L’interprétation de la Constitution : enjeux éthiques et de santé, Jean-Claude AMEISEN, Professeur, Paris Diderot, Président du Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique
12h30- 14h Déjeuner libre
2ème partie : les perceptions des effets de la Constitution 14h – 17h30
  • La Constitution à l'épreuve du multiculturalisme. Perspective anthropologique à partir des cas péruviens et boliviens, Valérie ROBIN-AZEVEDO, Professeure, Paris Descartes
  • Les effets migratoires des Constitutions. Point de vue d’un géographe, Gérard-François DUMONT, Recteur, Professeur, Paris Sorbonne
  • Les nanosciences sous le regard (ou pas) de la Constitution française, Bernard BARTENLIAN, Professeur, Paris Sud
Pause
  • Les droits fondamentaux de la parole humaine. Point de vue de deux informaticiens, Claude MONTACIE, Professeur, Karen FORT, Maîtresse de conférences, Paris Sorbonne
  • Propos conclusifs, Lauréline FONTAINE, Professeure, Sorbonne Nouvelle
17h30 : Fin des travaux
 Venue:
Salle Bourjac - 17 rue de la Sorbonne
Paris, France (75005)
More information here.

13 March 2015

NOTICE: Law and Humanities course 2015 (Rome, March-June 2015)


WHAT Law and the Humanities, course

WHEN Spring semester March-June 2015

WHERE Roma Tre University, Law Department

All information here

The aim of this Spring Semester course (first proposed in 2008) is to explore the fascinating, hopefully problematical interactions between Law and Literature, Law and Philosophy, Law and Anthropology, Law and Cinema, Law and Architecture, Law and Iconography and even Law and Music with the help of well known professors as well as PhD students coming from all over the world, who present each week a different topic. They express themselves in the new “lingua franca”, English, which is particularly suitable for a Law and the Humanities course, as we have only recently “imported” this field of study – at least within the academia – from the United States.
The course is organized around 3 “macro-fields”: LANGUAGE & LITERATURE, VISUAL and PERFORMANCE. It is directed by prof. Emanuele Conte, the chair of Medieval and Modern Legal History at the RomaTre Law Department and co-organized by Dr. Stefania Gialdroni, temporary research fellow in Medieval and Modern Legal History (BookAlive Project) and Dr. Angela Condello, now visiting professor at the Faculty of Law of the University of Ghent (“Law and the Humanities” course).