Hart is publishing a new book on
paradigms in modern European comparative law.
ABOUT THE BOOK
This book uses the philosophy of
Thomas Kuhn to provide a new vision of the development of European comparative
law that will challenge and inspire scholars in the field.
With the 'empathic' use of some
ideas from Kuhn's theories on the history of science – paradigm,
paradigm-shift, puzzle-solving research and incommensurability – the book
rethinks the modern history of European comparative law from the late 19th
century to the modern day.
It argues that three major
paradigms determine modern comparative law:
- historical and comparative
jurisprudence,
- droit comparé, and
- post-World War II comparative
law.
It concludes that contemporary
methodological trends are not signs of a paradigm-shift toward a postmodern and
culturalist understanding of comparative law, but that the new approach spreads
the idea of methodological plurality.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Balázs Fekete is Associate
Professor at the Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Law and Senior Research
Fellow at the Centre of Social Sciences Institute for Legal Studies, Hungary.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Scope and Subject
I. The History of Comparative Law
and a History of Comparative Law
II. The Dominance of Descriptive
Linearity
III. Comparative Law as a
Discipline and the Application of Comparative Methods in Law
IV. Ancient or Modern History of
Comparative Law Thinking
V. Comparative Law and
Comparative Constitutional Law
VI. A Mezzo-Perspective Approach
1. The History of Comparative Law
and Kuhn's Oeuvre
I. Studying Science as a
Historical Phenomenon: Some Preliminaries
II. Applying Kuhn's Legacy to
Understand the History of Comparative Legal Studies
III. Lessons from Kuhn in the
Historiography of Legal Scholarship
2. Historical-Comparative
Jurisprudence
I. Introduction: The
Centuries-Long Pre-Paradigm Period and the Rise of the First Paradigm
II. Prologue: The Modern
Precursors and the Pre-Paradigm Period
III. General Background: The Rise
of Positivism and the Idea of Evolution
IV. Historical and Comparative
Jurisprudence – The Emergence of the Paradigm in England
V. From Ethnologische
Jurisprudenz to Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft – The Birth of a Paradigm in
Germany
VI. The First Paradigm of Modern
Comparative Law: A Summary
3. The Paradigm of Droit Comparé
I. Fin-de-siècle Atmosphere
II. A New Wave of
Institutionalisation
III. The 1900 Paris Congress of
Comparative Law
IV. The Establishment of the New
Paradigm
V. The Development of the
Paradigm – Functionalism, Global Law and Skepticism
VI. Characteristics of the Second
Paradigm
4. The Third Paradigm –
Post-World War II Comparative Law
I. Introductory Remarks: The New
World Order and Comparative Law Scholarship
II. The Taxonomy of the World's
Legal Orders
III. The Renewal of Comparative
Law Methodology – The Victory of Functionalism
IV. The Third Paradigm
5. New Trends in Contemporary
Comparative Law: Toward a Paradigm Shift?
I. A Changing Scholarly Landscape
II. A Cultural Turn in
Comparative Law?
III. The Decline of
Methodological Exclusivity in Comparative Law Thinking
IV. Paradigm Shift in Comparative
Law?
Concluding Thoughts
I. On the Validity of This
Research, with Special Regard to the Relevance of Kuhn's Ideas
II. On the Utility of Having a
Single Book on the History of Modern European Comparative Law
III. On Recent Perspectives of
Comparative Law
Bibliography
More info here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.