Brill is publishing a new book on
prefectural judges in the judiciary of the Ming Dynasty.
ABOUT THE BOOK
In Justice in Print: Discovering
Prefectural Judges and Their Judicial Consistency in Late-Ming Casebooks,
Ka-chai Tam argues that the prefectural judge in the judiciary of the Ming
dynasty (1368–1644) became crucial to upholding justice in Chinese society.
In light of two late Ming
casebooks, namely the Mengshui zhai cundu (盟水齋存牘) by Yan Junyan and the Zheyu
xinyu (折獄新語)
by Li Qing, Ka-chai Tam demonstrates that the late Ming judges handled their
cases with a high level of consistency in judicial reasoning and practice in
every type of case, despite their differing regions and literary styles.
Equipped with relative institutional independence and growing professionalism,
they played an indispensable role in checking and guaranteeing the legal
performance of their subordinate magistrates.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ka-chai Tam, D.Phil. (2009),
University of Oxford, is Assistant Professor in History at the Hong Kong
Baptist University. He has published several dozen articles on the social and
maritime history of late imperial China and Chinese legal history.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgement
List of Tables
1 Introduction
2 Prefectural Judges in the Late-Ming Judicial System
3 Favorable Institutional Circumstances for the Development of Judicial
Professionalism
4 The Emergence of the Late-Ming Casebooks and Their Importance to Our
Understanding of the Ming Judiciary
5 Two Exemplary Samples of Late-Ming Casebooks by Prefectural
Judges: Mengshui zhai cundu and Zheyu xinyu
6 The High Degree of Consistency of Judicial Rulings as Reflected in the
Case Reports from Mengshui zhai cundu and Zheyu xinyu
Conclusion
Appendix
Bibliography
Index
More info here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.