(Source: Iuscommune.eu)
The Ius Commune Research School (a
cooperation between the law schools of the Universiteit Maastricht, the
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, the Universiteit Utrecht and the Universiteit
van Amsterdam) is organizing its Workshop on ‘Comparative Legal
History–Ius Commune in the Making’ coming November.
The Workshops on ‘Comparative
Legal History–Ius Commune in the Making’ aim to reveal and understand the
nature and effects of various legal formants in the development of law. Indeed,
forces of legal formants are too often lost or hidden beneath a superficies of
commonalities. In the past, we have explored the role of legal actors
(Edinburgh 2014), legal sources (Maastricht 2016), force of local laws (Utrecht
2017) and and methods and dynamics of law (Amsterdam 2018). The current
Workshop aims now to explore our contemporary emerging concept of ‘networks’ in
a comparative-historical perspective. These networks shape and challenge
boundaries of traditional legal categories (e.g., persons, things, contracts,
torts, actions) as semi-autonomous social fields (Sally Falk Moore 1973), and
thus have always grown and waned, and have had an impact on law and society.
Networks are a form of social arrangement, and grow and nurture in that sfumato
and agonal human environment–these days even electronically. History shows that
at all times these social arrangements have taken shape; actors tend to group
themselves in clusters to survive, attain synergy, to strengthen their
positions to serve common interests. Networks have different origins,
objectives, and attain different effects. Some networks interact for a common
goal, while others act in isolation. Networks can have a temporary presence or
even attain a more permanent and even formal place in society, contributing to
its resilience or decline. In legal terms: they may have influence in, on the
one hand, persons reaching consensus and (legally) acting in the private life
(e.g., persons, things, obligations, torts, actions) or, on the other hand, the
public life (e.g., legislation, administration, judicial decisions).
Networks–or social arrangements–may be found all over. Different time-periods
in the order of law, including Roman law, the learned ius commune,
nineteenth-century codification, and the more recent efforts towards a European
private law harmonization will offer us insights on the role of networks. Law in
the making can be better explained by a look into the role of networks at
different times and places. Organisers: Harry Dondorp, Wouter Druwé, Michael
Milo, Pim Oosterhuis, and Agustín Parise
14.00 – 14.10 Wouter Druwé (KU
Leuven)
Introductory Remarks
Panel 1: Academics
Chair: Michael Milo (Utrecht
University)
14.10 – 14.25 David Magalhães
(University of Coimbra)
Far-Reaching Connections arising
from ‘Universitas Magistrorum et Scholarium’. The
Example of Peter the Chanter,
Innocent III, and the End of Ordeals
14.25 – 14.40 Jan Biemans
(Utrecht University)
The Development of Private Law
Theory in the United States and the Netherlands and their
Interrelations. On Roscoe Pound,
Oliver Wendell Holmes jr. and Paul Scholten
14.40 – 14.55 Agustín Parise
(Maastricht University)
The Committee on Legal History of
the Association of American Law Schools and a
Transatlantic Endeavor to Develop
Comparative Legal History (1905-1928)
14.55 – 15.15 Plenary Discussion
15.15 – 15.30 Coffee / Tea
Panel 2: Judges and Merchants
Chair: Agustin Parise (Maastricht
University)
15.30 – 15.45 Willem Theus (KU
Leuven)
Consular Courts
15.45 – 16.00 Johannes W. Flume
(Free University of Berlin)
A Spatial History of Exchanges or
Bourses: On the Rise and Fall of an Iconic Place of
Capitalism
16.15 – 16.35 Plenary Discussion
16.35 – 16.45 Coffee / Tea
Panel 3: Change
Chair: Harry Dondorp (VU)
16.45 – 17.00 Pim Oosterhuis
(Maastricht University)
The New 19th Century Dutch Codes'
Greatest Protagonist: Abraham de Pinto's Lifelong Plea
for the New Codes within the
Dutch Legal Community
17.00 – 17.15 Anna Klimaszewska
(University of Gdańsk)
Debtors and Creditors – The Grey
Zone of Practice in Meeting Obligations in the Polish
Territories in the First Decades
of the Nineteenth Century
17.15 – 17.30 Laura Macgregor
(University of Edinburgh)
Partnerships and Attributes of
Legal Personality
17.30 – 17.45 Plenary Discussion
17.50 – 18.00 Pim Oosterhuis
(Maastricht University)
Concluding Remarks
More info here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.