(Source: Routledge)
Routledge is publishing a new book on the
Independent Regulatory Commissions (1883-1937) in the United States.
ABOUT THE BOOK
A basic feature of the modern US administrative
state taken for granted by legal scholars but neglected by political scientists
and historians is its strong judiciality. Formal, or court-like, adjudication
was the primary method of first-order agency policy making during the first
half of the twentieth century. Even today, most US administrative agencies hire
administrative law judges and other adjudicators conducting hearings using
formal procedures autonomously from the agency head. No other industrialized
democracy has even come close to experiencing the systematic state
judicialization that took place in the United States.
Why did the American administrative state
become highly judicialized, rather than developing a more efficiency-oriented
Weberian bureaucracy? Legal scholars argue that lawyers as a profession imposed
the judicial procedures they were the most familiar with on agencies. But this
explanation fails to show why the judicialization took place only in the United
States at the time it did. Okayama demonstrates that the American institutional
combination of common law and the presidential system favored policy
implementation through formal procedures by autonomous agencies and that it
induced the creation and development of independent regulatory commissions
explicitly modeled after courts from the late nineteenth century. These
commissions judicialized the state not only through their proliferation but
also through the diffusion of their formal procedures to executive agencies
over the next half century, which led to a highly fairness-oriented
administrative state.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Hiroshi
Okayama is Professor of Political Science in
the Faculty of Law at Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations
Introduction
1. Chapter 1: Why Did the U.S. Administrative
State Judicialize?
2. Chapter 2: The Judicial Roots of the
Interstate Commerce Commission
3. Chapter 3: Creating the "Supreme Court
of Finance"
4. Chapter 4: Retrenching Administrative
Commissions, Expanding State Judiciality
5. Chapter 5: The Institutional Consolidation
of the Independent Regulatory Commissions
Conclusion
Notes
Works Cited
Index
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.