(Source: Princeton University)
Via Legal
History blog, we learned of a call for papers for a conference and workshop
in the field of medico-legal history at Princeton. Here the call:
The Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical
Studies and the Department of History at Princeton University are hosting a
conference and workshop on “Law, Difference, and Healthcare:
Making Sense of Structural Racism in Medico-Legal History,” organized by George Aumoithe (Davis Center postdoctoral research
associate). Our
gathering will be 1-1/2 days long to be held from Thursday to Friday afternoon
of June 6—7, 2019. Our keynote speakers will be author of Medical
Bondage: Race, Gender, and the Origins of American Gynecology Deirdre
Cooper Owens and author of Just Medicine: A Cure for Racial Inequality
in American Health Care Dayna Bowen Matthew.
This workshop shall convene graduate students, post-doctoral researchers, and faculty who employ historical methodologies in their work. Our focus will be to examine the qualities and conditions that have produced the spaces, laws, and legalities that structure racism in medicine, healthcare, public health, and related social policy. In recent decades, many of these areas have been addressed through studies of the construction of “race” and genomics, specific diseases, clinical medicine, and medical institutions.
Much work remains, however, to historicize the
sociological concept of structural racism. Our workshop will remix approaches
in the history of medicine and legal history. What does a medico-legal history
that accounts for both individual and collective racism in medicine, space, law
and its legalities look like? What historiographical interventions are today’s
scholarship making? What new methodologies and archives are emerging?
Despite extensive work on structural
determinants of health and the history of medical racism, racialized health
disparities persist in the United States and globally. We will consider
structural dimensions of health that have long been relegated to the margins of
the field. Some oft-neglected sites of care in the medico-legal historiography
include: adult education, affordable child care, bias in medical education,
corporatization of healthcare, disaster management, drug treatment, food
pantries, health promotion, housing advocacy, insurance navigation, job
(re-)training, neighborhood health clinics, mental health, medical intern and
nurses unions, migrant health, prisoner re-entry, pre-natal care, “safety-net”
hospitals, syringe exchange, and welfare bureaus.
By connecting and comparing different
approaches, our workshop will be geared toward solidifying the state of the
field via an edited volume composed of original history essays. With an
unforeseeable range of possibilities for illustrating law, difference, and
structural racism in healthcare, we are open to a wide range of proposals. As
such, possible papers might:
· Describe
the historiography of medicine & law with regards to racism
· Account
for the interplay of racism with sexual, gender, and other social differences
· Consider
the instantiation of structural racism in the built environment
· Define
“structural racism” vis-vis medical, public health, or social policy history
· Offer
unique archival, oral history, and social science perspectives &
methodologies
· Account
for geographies of health and differential access to sites of care
·
Deconstruct the tenets of value-neutrality and “objectivity” of medical science
· Consider
the deployment of “race” in medical and scientific practice
· Apply
Critical Race Theory, Black Radical Tradition, or other frameworks to history
· Address
the medico-legal histories of Latinx and other underrepresented groups
· Explain
the inscription of racialized social difference through law and policy
· Elucidate
the racialized political economy of healthcare
· Propose
new ways of seeing social difference in law and healthcare
·
Historicize the tensions between layperson expertise and medical education
· Conduct
critical analyses of the logics and epistemologies of “race” in medicine
There are a limited number of
presentation slots available before the program is finalized. This is an
opportunity for scholars with works-in-progress to workshop their material and
find a venue for future publication in an edited volume. If interested, please
send a paper proposal abstract of no more than 500 words and a two-page CV to
Dr. George Aumoithe (aumoithe [at] princeton.edu) by May 1, 2019. If
accepted, pre-circulated paper drafts of at least 5,000 words are due by Friday,
May 17. Final drafts for the edited volume are projected to be no more
than 8,500 words.
A group of pre-registered observers and
attendees are also welcome to attend. Conference registration information will
be forthcoming and distributed to networks in late April.
Organized
by Dr. George
Aumoithe, postdoctoral research associate, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical
Studies and Department of History, Princeton University
All information can be found here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.