(Source: Cambridge University Press)
Cambridge
University Press recently published a new book on the usage of historical
arguments by lawyers.
ABOUT
Lawyers and
judges often make arguments based on history - on the authority of precedent
and original constitutional understandings. They argue both to preserve the
inspirational, heroic past and to discard its darker pieces - such as feudalism
and slavery, the tyranny of princes and priests, and the subordination of
women. In doing so, lawyers tame the unruly, ugly, embarrassing elements of the
past, smoothing them into reassuring tales of progress. In a series of essays
and lectures written over forty years, Robert W. Gordon describes and analyses
how lawyers approach the past and the strategies they use to recruit history
for present use while erasing or keeping at bay its threatening or inconvenient
aspects. Together, the corpus of work featured in Taming the Past offers an
analysis of American law and society and its leading historians since 1900.
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR
Robert W. Gordon, Stanford University,
California
Robert W. Gordon is a Professor of Law at
Stanford University, California. He was President of the American Society for
Legal History in 2000, has served on several bar association committees and
task forces devoted to reform of the profession, and has previously taught at
the University of Wisconsin, Yale University, Connecticut, Harvard University
Massachusetts and the University of Oxford.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Part I. The Common Law Tradition in Legal Historiography:
1. The common law tradition in American legal historiography
2. Holmes' common law as legal and social science
Part II. Legal Historians:
3. James Willard Hurst, against the common law tradition - social-legal history's pioneer
4. Hurst recaptured
5. Morton Horwitz and his critics: a conflict of narratives
6. The elusive transformation
7. Method and politics: Horwitz on lawyers' uses of history
8. E. P. Thompson's legacies
9. Owen Fiss, the constitution of liberal order at the 'Troubled Beginnings of the Modern State'
Part III. History and Historicism in Legal History and Argument:
10. Historicism in legal scholarship
11. Critical legal histories
12. The past as authority and social critic
13. Taming the past: three lectures on history in legal argument
14. Originalism and nostalgic traditionalism
15. Undoing historical injustice.
Part I. The Common Law Tradition in Legal Historiography:
1. The common law tradition in American legal historiography
2. Holmes' common law as legal and social science
Part II. Legal Historians:
3. James Willard Hurst, against the common law tradition - social-legal history's pioneer
4. Hurst recaptured
5. Morton Horwitz and his critics: a conflict of narratives
6. The elusive transformation
7. Method and politics: Horwitz on lawyers' uses of history
8. E. P. Thompson's legacies
9. Owen Fiss, the constitution of liberal order at the 'Troubled Beginnings of the Modern State'
Part III. History and Historicism in Legal History and Argument:
10. Historicism in legal scholarship
11. Critical legal histories
12. The past as authority and social critic
13. Taming the past: three lectures on history in legal argument
14. Originalism and nostalgic traditionalism
15. Undoing historical injustice.
For more information, see the publisher’s
website
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.