JOURNAL: (2015) 2:1 Critical Analysis of Law - New Historical Jurisprudence & Historical Analysis of Law

(2015) 2:1 Critical Analysis of Law, an International & Interdisciplinary Law Review, is out. 

Its theme is

New Historical Jurisprudence & Historical Analysis of Law

The New Historical Jurisprudence issue highlights and encourages a trend in recent legal scholarship, or rather scholarship on law, that--like the original historical jurisprudence--pursues a historical analysis of law, as a form of critical analysis of law, rather than legal history, as applied historiography. Generated by theorists with a historical sensibility, and historians with theoretical curiosity, this emerging body of work exploits and challenges the intersection of history and jurisprudence in innovative and exciting ways.

It includes:

New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law Markus D. Dubber

On the Coloniality of Modern Law Samera Esmeir

Radbruch’s Rechtsstaat and Schmitt’s Legal Order: Legalism, Legality, and the Institution of Law Mireille Hildebrandt

The Judicialization of Police Aaron T. Knapp

Transatlantic Functionalism: New Deal Models and European Integration Peter L. Lindseth

“Society Owes Them Much”: Veteran Defendants and Criminal Responsibility in Australia in the Twentieth Century Arlie Loughnan

Private Law Codification, Modernization and Nationalism: A View from Critical Legal History Heikki Pihlajamäki

“Comparing” Jewish and Islamic Legal Traditions: Between Disciplinarity and Critical Historical Jurisprudence Lena Salaymeh

The Riddle of Sub-judice and the Modern Law of Contempt Galia Schneebaum, Shai J. Lavi

Regarding Untimeliness: Medieval Legal History and Modern Law Karl Shoemaker

The Rejection of Horizontal Judicial Review During America’s Colonial Period Robert J. Steinfeld